Bouillabaisse


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2006 March
2006 February
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January

My Links
Home
Sea-Eat
HaitiChildren.com
Adopt A Minefield
Info for Americans living abroad
Jewish Voice For Peace
Gush-Shalom
All Is One
The Hunger Site
Global Exchange
Peace Star Project
Iraq Occupation Watch
Peace Mid-East Dialogue Group
B'TSELEM
Parents Circle - Families Forum
Women's World
P10K

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog



Template problems
11.30.04 (11:33 am)   [edit]
I will be working off and on with my template problem. So, if you are having problems viewing this site because of the overlapping borders hopefully it will be fixed soon.
Any suggestions for speeding me along (outside of shut your site down you ignorant socialist) will be greatly
appreciated.

Thanks for patience and do come back.
 
Let's talk about Iraq
11.30.04 (8:52 am)   [edit]
Again the day is beginning well. I look at comments from A personal note on Iraq and blogging from yesterday and find a typical response from someone who believes this war is a good thing. He's tired of hearing about all the Iraqi deaths. They are expendable n'est pas? All in the name of freedom, of course. He says to give him an f'in break. I think the people of Iraq are saying this very same thing to the US military.
But, I'm glad this person visited and expressed his views. I hope more do. We need to talk about these things and try to keep it civil. He did and I appreciate it. Let's talk. I'm not afraid.


If you are visiting this site from outside Tblog please leave your URL so I can return the visit. Yes, I'm even talking about you hardline righties and religious fanatics.
Tblog's comment applet doesn't give you this option so just type it in please and thanks for visiting.
 
Thanksgiving in Fallujah
11.29.04 (7:57 am)   [edit]
The Iraqi Red Crescent fear more than 6,000 people may have died in the Fallujah offensive. They are finally mangaging to bring aid to the people. They said 60 people came out to get assistance in one street alone.

"Bodies can be seen everywhere and people were crying when receiving the food parcels. It is very sad, it is a human disaster," Dr. Said Haqi, Red Crescent president said.

Hey! I bet they had a great Thanksgiving. I read one man has been chowing down for a month on sugar and water. What..no cranberry sauce?

 
A personal note on Iraq and blogging
11.29.04 (6:26 am)   [edit]
Have you noticed most of those, including Bush and Co., who speak the loudest about staying in Iraq don't live there? I've several times linked to Riverbend, she does live there, who shares what it really is like to be an Iraqi in Iraq today. Somehow they overlook what these Iraqis have to say. This can only be because somewhere in their twisted thinking they have come to believe Iraqis don't have enough sense to judge the reality on the ground. Maybe they see them as a bunch of backward heathens in the same way the native Indians were viewed by the settlers. It's amazing how we are still managing to ignore the culture of others and even kill them when they refuse to accept our pushing and shoving.

Is my disgust coming through? I hope so.

What brought this on? I do very little personal commentary but while doing my thing at Blog Explosion (click on the link on the righthand side if you're interested or just curious), I noticed something. Conservative blogs must outnumber Progressive/leftwing blogs 2 to 1. All telling a story of what a good job is being done in Iraq while never once mentioning those that have died. Reading them is like listening to George Bush. None seem to have the ability to see through the fog or think for themselves. They just keep repeating the mantra. And guess what? They support each other! They're comments are full of encouragement for one another.

In contrast many of us are dropping out like flies. The good guys are losing, folks. I'm not going to stop but I have to say there are days when I wonder if it's worth it.

Maybe I should just get me a little place in the mountains and let the world go to hell.

The day is starting out well...
 
Rid the world of landmines - You can help
11.28.04 (8:10 am)   [edit]
An important meeting opens in the Kenyan capital, Nairobi, today to assess progress since ratification five years ago of the Ottawa Convention to prohibit the use and production of mines. Since 1999, more than 150 countries have agreed to ban the use of landmines targeted at individuals.

In that same period, tens of millions of stockpiled landmines have been destroyed before they could be planted in the ground, and more than 1,000 sq km (386 sq miles) of land has been cleared of five million mines.

The numbers are impressive and the commitment of the signatories to the Ottawa Convention to rid the world of anti-personnel devices is far-reaching.

But there is no room for complacency. Three of the most world's powerful nations - the United States, China and Russia - have refused to sign the convention and it is estimated that 15 countries are still producing anti-personnel mines.

Every year, an estimated 20,000 people still become victims of landmine explosions.

Donate now to Adopt-A-Minefield to clear landmines & help landmine survivors.

It costs about £1 (about $2) to clear a square metre of minefield & about £50 ($95)to help a child walk again.

Adopt-A-Minefield has raised over £6.5m (approx $12m) to date - funding clearance of over 18 million square metres of land.

What a Christmas gift this would be!

Adopt A Minefield
 
Jailing Reporters
11.28.04 (7:34 am)   [edit]
YET ANOTHER reporter is facing jail at the hands of a federal judge for doing his job. Jim Taricani, a reporter for WJAR television in Rhode Island, was convicted last week of criminal contempt of court for refusing to identify the person who leaked him an FBI videotape of a public official in Providence taking a bribe. The story clearly was important. Several local officials, including the one on tape, went to prison in connection with the federal corruption investigation that produced the tape. But Chief Judge Ernest C. Torres of federal district court in Providence appointed a special prosecutor to investigate the leak. Mr. Taricani honorably has refused to violate the promise of confidentiality he had to give his source to get important information to the public. As a consequence, Mr. Taricani, who has a history of heart trouble, could face up to six months in jail.

Read more at the Washington Post
 
Sharon and Abbas say they are ready to meet
11.28.04 (7:30 am)   [edit]
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has said in an interview that he is ready to meet Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas and try to coordinate a Gaza pullout with a new Palestinian government.

In a separate interview also with Newsweek magazine on Sunday, Abbas said he too was ready for a summit with Sharon, but after the January 9 elections in the Palestinian territories in which he is a leading candidate to replace Yasser Arafat as president.

"When they would like to meet, we will meet," Sharon said, when asked whether he was ready to meet with Abbas, also known as Abu Mazen.

Abbas, responding to a similar question, said that "after the elections, I'm ready to meet at any time with Sharon".

Sharon also suggested he would seek to discuss with the Palestinians his plan to withdraw Israeli soldiers and Jewish settlers from the Gaza Strip next year, which has been billed as a unilateral move.

"I am going to make every effort to coordinate our disengagement plan with the new Palestinian government -- one that can assume control over areas we evacuate," Sharon said.

Abbas said the Palestinians were not yet ready to handle security in Gaza but hoped it would be possible.

"Now we have some sort of chaos, especially in Gaza," Abbas said.

"We are ready to take when we rebuild our security apparatus. If you tell me (do it) now, I'll say I cannot, but I'm working very hard to rebuild the security apparatus."

Sharon said Israel would keep its troops away from Palestinian towns during the January elections.

Swiss Info

"We will see what we will see."
 
French politics: Chirac and Sarkozy
11.28.04 (7:24 am)   [edit]
Very interesting an informative article at the Economist on the political life and times of these two important figures in France. I enjoy French politics much more than US politics. It's not nearly as dirty although the politicians may be.

Sarkozy is to be made head of Chirac's ruling UMP party today replacing Alain Juppe who was found guilty recently in a party financing scandal.
 
Imam survives shooting attack in Corsica
11.28.04 (7:14 am)   [edit]
Attackers shouting racist slurs opened fire on a Muslim prayer leader and scrawled a swastika in front of his door in the latest in an increase of racist incidents on the French island of Corsica, police said.

The Moroccan imam, Mohammed al-Akrach, was not injured in the attack at around 2:30 a.m (0130 GMT) Saturday at his home, which doubles as a prayer hall, in Sartene in southern Corsica.

Having first knocked at the imam's door, the attackers shouted racist slurs and fired gunshots when he came to answer. Before leaving, the group of several men also scrawled a swastika on the ground and the Corsican words "Arabi Fora" - Arabs out.

"They opened fire straight away, five or six shots," al-Akrach, 53, told reporters. "I hid myself near the wall. They tried to open the door by hitting it."

"I was very afraid but happily they then left by car," he added. "What happened is very serious."

There were no immediate claims of responsibility. Police were investigating.

A year ago, the front door of the imam's prayer hall was doused with inflammable liquid and set afire.

Jerusalem Post
 
British American Tobacco smuggling for profit
11.27.04 (10:52 am)   [edit]
One of the world's biggest tobacco producers deliberately encouraged cigarette smuggling in developing countries to offset its dwindling profits in Europe, research has shown.

Studies by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine found British American Tobacco used smuggling as part of its corporate strategy to expand into lucrative markets in Asia.

Confidential documents from BAT's offices in Guildford, England, show the company used the illicit trade in cigarettes to lure new smokers, undermine health initiatives and help it capture key markets.

Public health experts and anti-smoking campaigners say BAT condoned tax evasion and colluded in smuggling billions of cigarettes in a global drive to increase sales.

The allegations do not suggest BAT employees carried out the smuggling, but it is alleged executives controlled the brands, marketing campaigns and timing, and sought to manage volumes and price levels of the smuggling markets.

Researchers said the findings raised serious questions about corporate conduct and how smuggling had become a business strategy rather than the business of rogue traders.

Read More The Australian
Via News Compass
 
Crime of opinion
11.27.04 (10:25 am)   [edit]
Italy faces what is widely seen as an assault on the right to demonstrate this week after it was announced that 13 members of a flamboyant, although non-violent, radical group are to be tried for "crimes" which could put them behind bars for years.

But the 13 members of Italy's "disobbedienti" group who go on trial next week are not charged with crimes of assault or vandalism. Instead, they face grave but abstract accusations: "political conspiracy ... with the aim of disrupting the functions of the government"; "making subversive propaganda, and creating an association of 20,000 people to violently subvert the constituted economic order of the state".

"The crime of opinion," said the left-wing daily L'Unita, "is a relic of the Fascist era and must be abolished". Fausto Bertinotti, leader of the Rifondazione Comunista party, called the trial "disturbing and dangerous", the product of a "repressive drift, in progress for some time, for which they want to criminalise dissent, menacing the basis of the state of rights."

The same anger was echoed in the centre-left Margherita [Daisy] party. "I agree with practically nothing they do," said Gianclaudio Bressa, "but what is at issue is the right to demonstrate. That's why parliament must raise its voice". A prominent union leader, Guglielmo Epifani, said: "You can't criminalise people simply for the content of the ideas they express."

Read More Independent
 
Ukrainian revolution blog
11.27.04 (9:41 am)   [edit]
Interested in what's happening in the Ukraine? Blogging from the Ukraine..visit Ukraine Revolution
 
Adopt A Minefield
11.27.04 (9:09 am)   [edit]
The landmine that killed 11-year-old Josip Nenadovic near his house in a Croatian village a few days ago was, quite possibly, planted before he was born.

The boy was blown up as he went to cut a branch from a hazel tree for a fishing rod. He was another victim of the vicious, hidden and totally indiscriminate weapons that still litter the Balkans and many other regions where war ended years ago.

"The worst thing that can happen to a man is to bury his own child," said his father Franjo, appealing for all mines to finally be cleared from his country, where they were liberally strewn in the fighting from 1991 to 1995.

But as experts at the summit for a mine-free world in Nairobi next week are likely to report, a total clean-up could take a very long time.

In Bosnia, they say it could take 70 years to clear an estimated 1 million mines, often planted without maps, and sometimes in areas where fighting never did occur.

AlertNet

Donate now to Adopt-A-Minefield to clear landmines & help landmine survivors.

It costs about £1 to clear a square metre of minefield & about £50 to help a child walk again

Adopt-A-Minefield has raised over £6.5m (approx $12m) to date - funding clearance of over 18 million square metres of land.

What a Christmas gift this would be!

Adopt A Minefield
 
Act Now to Stop War and End Racism
11.27.04 (8:55 am)   [edit]
Calling U.S. President George W. Bush a "war criminal," A.N.S.W.E.R. says more than 4,000 people have already endorsed its call for a mass demonstration along the inaugural route between the White House and the U.S. Capitol's West Front, where every president since 1980 has planned to take the oath of office.

Our demonstrations will be a powerful statement in solidarity with all those who are under attack by the Bush administration -- from Cuba to Palestine to Haiti to the Philippines to Iran and elsewhere," the radical group said.

Join the counter-inaugural demonstration on Jan. 20, 2005.

Act Now San Francisco
Act Now Boston
 
Turk says 'genocide' being committed in Iraq
11.27.04 (8:38 am)   [edit]
When it's all said and done the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq will go down in history as just that. The truth will finally be told although years from now. Those ignoring state crime and slaughter of the people of this country are fooling themselves.
Turkey has little right to talk about barbarism and human rights although they are attempting to change. I guess that old saying 'it takes one to know one' is apt.

"The occupation has turned into barbarism," the Friday edition of newspaper Yeni Safak quoted Mehmet Elkatmis, head of parliament's human rights commission, as saying. "The U.S. administration is committing genocide … in Iraq.

"Never in human history have such genocide and cruelty been witnessed. Such a genocide was never seen in the time of the pharaohs nor of Hitler nor of [Benito] Mussolini," Italy's World War II-era fascist leader, Elkatmis said.

"This occupation has entirely imperialist aims," he was quoted as saying.

Elkatmis does not speak for Turkey's government but is a prominent member of the ruling Justice and Development Party, a center-right group with Islamist roots.

Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul played down Elkatmis' comments but defended Turks' right to speak freely.

Elkatmis' comments drew barely a flicker of interest in Turkey, where polls point to growing anti-American sentiment.

Turkey has been especially disturbed by the recent U.S. offensive against insurgents in Fallouja in which civilians have died and mosques have been damaged.

LA Times
 
Gbagdo divided his country
11.27.04 (8:17 am)   [edit]
When Gbagbo's forces violated the cease-fire this month and used the helicopters to attack peacekeeping positions, killing nine French soldiers and an American aid worker, the response was swift. The French launched a lightning strike, destroying the Ivorian air force, including the gunships.

The move may have smacked of colonial hubris, but it did not come in a vacuum. Gbagbo's past record caught up with him. Even other African nations are unwilling to listen to his explanations this time. In response, Gbagbo did what he has done repeatedly: unleashed armed, government-sanctioned thugs to loot, pillage and terrorize.

When the African Union called an emergency meeting to discuss the situation, Gbagbo skipped the event. Instead, he stayed home and named as head of the armed forces the very commander whose forces launched the attack on the peacekeepers. In an interview with The Post, Gbagbo questioned whether French troops had really died.

The tragedy for Ivory Coast is that the damage to the fabric of society, as well as to the economy, will be almost impossible to reverse. The businessmen fleeing the country provided thousands of jobs that are unlikely to return. Foreign investment has shriveled while unemployment has skyrocketed. The remittances sent by the immigrant workers to their homelands sustained hundreds of thousands of families. Muslims and Christians, northerners and southerners are separated by anger and fear.

The decision last Monday by the U.N. Security Council to impose an arms embargo on Ivory Coast -- with the possibility of further sanctions may give Gbagbo pause. The arms embargo, coupled with the threat of travel restrictions and economic penalties on those who continue to fan the violence, offers a chance to keep the crisis manageable as the international community, led by the African Union, seeks a solution. Gbagbo will undoubtedly make new promises to escape the sanctions. The United Nations should respond according to his actions, not his words.

Washington Post
 
11 year old Jemoh caught up in Liberia's long civil war
11.27.04 (7:48 am)   [edit]
Jemoh fled Liberia when she was eleven. She lived in a refugee camp in Sierra Leone for three years. Separated from her mother, she looked after her father, brother and sister. She describes the day she left Liberia:

“Everyone was running. People attacked the towns, the villages. They were holding people, beating them, killing them. My Pa said we must go to Sierra Leone and register in a camp.”

Jemoh was recently returned to Liberia, and had been looking forward to seeing members of her family On arrival she received a warm welcome from the people of the village, but their house had been burned down and Jemoh’s mother had left.

“I don’t know where she is. My grandma’s also not here. I don’t know what I’m going to do now.”

Jemoh is one of thousands of children caught up in Liberia’s long civil war, trying to pick up the pieces of their lives. Adama Robinson works for Save the Children in Liberia. He describes the dangers of sending children home without adequate support

“The country is not prepared now for people to go back. If you take me to where I cannot survive and I know that a gun can help me I’m going to run back into the bush pick up the gun again.”

Save the Children
 
Blind singer pleas for refugees
11.27.04 (7:45 am)   [edit]
Called 'All It Takes Is Love', it is a song about what it is like to be a refugee.

19 year old blind singer Andrew Coleman said: "I wrote the song because there are lots of charity songs that say what they are going to change.

"You hear Band Aid and it is 'we want to do this. We should do that'.

"I decided to write a song that would be through the eyes of a refugee.

"I knew that I don't know what it is like to be a refugee, but I wanted to try and imagine it. Two people from the UN got in contact with me and said they liked the track and wanted me to take part in the concert.

The concert is designed to raise awareness and vital funding for the more than 1.8m people affected by the continuing crisis in Darfur, Sudan.

The situation in the strife-torn region remains extremely volatile. More than 200,000 Sudanese have fled to neighbouring Chad and 1.6m people, who have been displaced internally, are now living in desperate conditions inside Darfur where there has been a complete breakdown in security. This is one of the world's worst humanitarian crises and urgently needed proceeds from the concert will be used to provide international protection and life-saving assistance to those affected.

Refugee Voices for Darfur is a United Nations refugee agency fundraising concert for the victims of Sudan.

The performance will be released as a CD and DVD at a later date.

Among the musicians taking part are singer-songwriter David Gray, lead singer of the Pretenders, Chrissie Hynde and disco diva Jocelyn Brown. The artists will be joined by the Royal Philharmonic Concert Orchestra, and Mercury Music Prize winners Franz Ferdinand will send a live video and message of support.

The concert is scheduled for 7:30pm on 8th December at London's Royal Albert Hall.

For media enquiries contact: Peter Kessler +44 20 7932 1020 - kessler@unhcr.ch or Anna Little +41 22 739 7773 / +44 797 129 3141 - littlea@unhcr.ch

Tickets: Royal Albert Hall

ic Liverpool
 
Today is buy nothing day
11.27.04 (7:36 am)   [edit]


Buy Nothing Day exposes the environmental and ethical consequences of consumerism. The developed countries - only 20% of the world population are consuming over 80% of the earth's natural resources, causing a disproportionate level of environmental damage and unfair distribution of wealth.

As consumers we need to question the products we buy and challenge the companies who produce them. What are the true risks to the environment and developing countries? The argument is broad and deep - while it continues we should be looking for simple solutions - Buy Nothing Day is a good place to start.

Buy Nothing Day
Via The Front Line
 
Yahia Said: Iraq's tightrope walk
11.26.04 (5:23 pm)   [edit]
Will war or politics prevail in Iraq? Two months before the planned elections, Iraqi civil society scholar Yahia Said tells openDemocracy’s Caspar Henderson that he can glimpse “a small window of opportunity amidst this cycle of occupation, alienation and violence”.

Read this at Open Democracy

I have posted a link to this site several times. It's an excellent source of information. Registration is not required for all articles but regardless, it's free.
 
Annual NY City Hunger Survey
11.26.04 (5:04 pm)   [edit]
Low–income New Yorkers—including those who still haven’t recovered jobs or income lost after the September 11 attacks—are still flooding the city’s approximately 1,298 food pantries and soup kitchens in record numbers. Low-income, hungry New Yorkers have yet to experience any tangible economic recovery.

New York City’s food pantries and soup kitchens are increasingly serving people who have worked hard and played by the rules but no longer earn enough money to feed their children. Fifty-two percent of agencies said they were feeding an increased number of working people; 26% of the people they serve are in working families. Ironically, even though local unemployment far exceeds the national rate, the number of working people utilizing pantries and kitchens in New York City continues to rise. The most likely explanation for this paradox is that two trends have occurred simultaneously: 1) Many people who were working before 9/11 needed to use pantries and kitchens even then because their wages were so low, but after 9/11 they lost their jobs and then needed pantries and kitchens even more; and 2) an even greater number of families in the last few years continued to maintain some employment but their wage growth did not keep up with skyrocketing costs for housing, food, health care, transportation, and child care in New York City, thus forcing them to use pantries and kitchens for the first time.

The pantries and kitchens are serving countless New Yorkers who either lost their jobs or have had their hours or tips cut back sharply in the last three years — and have either run out of unemployment compensation or were in jobs not covered by the compensation system. Read More
 
Looking ahead at oil
11.26.04 (3:31 pm)   [edit]
Many economists believe the higher average oil prices trend is here to stay.
For 20 years, the oil market has lived with overcapacity, but the market is now preparing itself to work with under-capacity for 3-5 years.

"OPEC has no more spare capacity, apart from Saudi Arabia, and is unlikely to restore this spare capacity. We will be lucky if OPEC invest enough to match demand in the future," Frederic Lasserre, Head of Commodities Research at SG Corporate and Investment Banking said.

Within 30 years time, OPEC needs to double its production capacity to face demand, but this will required tremendous investments as well as the opening of their upstream capacity to international companies, a hot political potato.

The International Energy Agency has estimated that there will be a need for $3 trillion of investment over the next 30 years to satisfy demand in term of quality and also quality. Read More
 
Oil raises US military stakes in Colombia
11.26.04 (2:39 pm)   [edit]
The Iraq war may have knocked Colombia off the front page, but Mideast chaos has made South America's energy resources more strategic to the United States. Colombia itself is among the top 15 global suppliers to the United States, and Uribe hopes to privatize the country's oil industry as part of his push to join President Bush's Free Trade Area of the Americas. Venezuela, bordering Colombia, is the fourth-largest U.S. supplier after Saudi Arabia, Mexico and Canada. Venezuela's populist leader Hugo Chavez is himself a White House target for Western hemisphere "regime change" - as seen by the current push for sanctions.

Meanwhile, the oil industry has charted a new thrust into the Amazon regions of Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia - countries all now receiving U.S. military aid under the Andean Regional Initiative, the Bush administration's expansion of President Bill Clinton's "Plan Colombia."

The White House has now dropped the fiction that Plan Colombia is an anti-drug operation. A post-9/11 $28.9 billion supplemental anti-terrorism package allowed U.S. military aid to be targeted against groups on the State Department's terrorist list - including both Colombia's two leftist rebel groups, as well as the rightist paramilitary network known as the United Colombian Self-Defense Forces (AUC), which is responsible for the vast majority of massacres and atrocities, according to groups like Amnesty International.

Interesting and to be watched. Read More
 
Riot on Aboriginal island over police cell death
11.26.04 (10:34 am)   [edit]
Police reinforcements have been flown to Palm Island, Australia, to restore order after about 200 people protesting the death of Cameron Doomagee, an indigenous Aborigine, burnt down a police station, police residence and a courthouse.

Residents are said to be driving their cars onto the airstrip of Palm Island to prevent extra police landing. 15 police sent to Palm Island last week were holed up inside the island's hospital.

Australian radio said the riot started after the release of a post-mortem examination of Doomagee. The autopsy found he had four broken ribs and died from a punctured lung.

Palm Island is one of Australia's largest Aboriginal communities, and is home to about 3,000 people.

As with many other Aboriginal communities, it suffers serious problems of unemployment, domestic violence and alcohol abuse.

It was once described by the Guinness Book of Records as the most violent place in the world, outside a combat zone.

Friday's violence follows a serious outbreak of racial rioting in Sydney in February, when more than 40 police were injured in a riot sparked by the death of an Aboriginal teenager.

"It is very much a white, black issue," said Nicky Willis. "The young people of Redfern were full of anger and now the young people here are full of anger."

Alert Net
 
Charles Walker to be executed Dec. 3
11.25.04 (7:29 pm)   [edit]
CharlesWalker

Charles Walker is scheduled to be executed in North Carolina on 3 December 2004. The jury which sentenced him to death did so despite finding that he had not actually killed Tito Davidson, whose body was never found. Several of the jurors now support clemency.


The state presented no physical evidence of any kind that linked Charles Walker to the murder: no fingerprints, no blood evidence, no autopsy, no DNA evidence, and no ballistics evidence. Indeed, there was no physical evidence of a murder, and no confession from the defendant. Yet Walker is to be executed for that death on Dec. 3. Only the testimony of five co-defendants ties Walker to Davidson's killing.

As far as Walker's lawyers know, no one has ever been executed in North Carolina based on the testimony of co-defendants without other evidence, such as a confession, physical clues or an identification by an uninvolved witness. In many other states, they say, Walker couldn't have been convicted, let alone faced execution, based on such evidence.

More at Amnesty


NewsObserver

 
Coca-Cola protesters in India attacked and arrested
11.25.04 (6:50 pm)   [edit]


Over a thousand community members adversely affected by Coca-Cola marched to the Coca-Cola factory premises in Mehdiganj, near the holy city of Varanasi in India on November 24, demanding that the factory shut down. The march in Mehdiganj was the end of a 10 day, 250 km march from Ballia, the site of another Coca-Cola bottling facility, to Mehdiganj, bringing attention to Coca-Cola's negative impacts on communities across India.

Communities living around Coca-Cola's bottling plants across India are facing severe water shortages, and the groundwater and soil have also been polluted, directly as a result of Coca-Cola's bottling operations in the area. The Coca-Cola company has also illegally occupied land in the area. Furthermore, tests have confirmed that Coca-Cola products in India contain high levels of pesticides, including DDT, sometimes higher than 30 times those allowed by US or EU standards. Coca-Cola was also distributing toxic waste from its plant to farmers in India, including Mehdiganj, under the guise of "fertilizer".

Towards the end of the rally, the marchers decided to march to the factory gates, about a hundred meters from the site of the rally. The armed police reacted violently and swiftly, with no warnings. The armed police launched a vicious lathi (baton) charge on all the marchers, and many women, in particular, became the target of male police officers who beat them incessantly. The police also chased after community members in the surrounding fields to beat them, many of whom were escaping the site of the violent police action. A Budhist monk was also attacked by the police, who showed no regard whatsoever for any one present in the area. The police attacks were ordered by Mr. Tahir Iqbal, ADM of police in Varanasi.

More at India Resource Center

 
It's easy to ignore conscience
11.25.04 (7:50 am)   [edit]
It's easy to ignore conscience
when you don't know hunger
when you haven't watched your child die in your arms
no longer having the strength to cry

It's easy to ignore conscience
when you haven't had your man ripped from your arms
thrown into a dungeon of terror
because he is...

It's easy to ignore conscience
when you haven't walked for miles and miles
everything you own on your back
looking for a bit of water, food, shelter, peace

It's easy to ignore conscience
when you have not stood in the rubble of your home
blown to bits by bombs of war
and peacemakers

It's easy to ignore conscience
when your table and cup are full
your children are safe and full
you are safe and full
of the joy of life

How long will we continue to look into the black eyes
of the children broken in body and spirit
ready to die
for lack of anything to live for

How long will we ignore conscience
before it ceases to speak
and truth is no longer part of us
and all we hear is the sound
of our own righteousness

©Dianne Maire
 
National Day of Mourning
11.24.04 (11:08 am)   [edit]


"Since 1970, Native Americans have gathered at noon on Cole's Hill in Plymouth to commemorate a National Day of Mourning on the U.S. Thanksgiving holiday. Many Native Americans do not celebrate the arrival of the Pilgrims and other European settlers. To them, Thanksgiving Day is a reminder of the genocide of millions of their people, the theft of their lands, and the relentless assault on their culture..."
More at United American Indians of New England
 
Things not exactly equal in France
11.24.04 (10:41 am)   [edit]
An official report presented to the French government Tuesday paints a damning picture of racial discrimination in the workplace and recommends a series of measures including the mandatory introduction of anonymous CVs.

According to the report, young people of Arab and African origin are up to five times more likely to be unemployed than the rest of the French population, while their chances of even achieving an interview are severely reduced as a result of their name and skin colour.

More at Expatica
 
Fighting the 'Rights' media machine
11.24.04 (10:37 am)   [edit]
It is not an exaggeration to say today that the most powerful nation on earth is in the grip of an ideological administration—backed by a vast network of right-wing think tanks, media outlets and attack groups—that can neutralize any political enemy with smears, such as the Swift Boat ads against John Kerry’s war record, or persuade large numbers of people that clearly false notions are true, like Saddam Hussein’s link to the 9/11 attacks.

The history is this: For the past quarter century, the right has spent billions of dollars to build a vertically integrated media apparatus—reaching from the powerhouse Fox News cable network through hard-line conservative newspapers and magazines to talk radio networks, book publishing, well-funded Internet operations and right-wing bloggers.

Using this infrastructure, the conservatives can put any number of “themes” into play that will instantaneously reach tens of millions of Americans through a variety of outlets, whose messages then reinforce each other in the public’s mind.

The end result of this imbalance has been that American democracy has been diminished. Indeed, the great American experiment with a democratic republic may be on the verge of becoming meaningless, since much of the information distributed through the conservative echo chamber is either wrong or wildly misleading—and since the mainstream press has been so thoroughly housebroken.

Yet, while it’s certainly true that the Bush administration and its allies have shown little regard for truthful information, it’s also a legitimate criticism of the Democrats and progressives that they haven’t fought nearly as hard as they should for honest information, the oxygen of any healthy democracy.

While many Americans see information as a birthright that is supposed to be delivered to them by the press like a newspaper thumping on the front doorstep, it is really a right that must be fought for like any other important right.

More at In These Times

 
Killing a wounded man 'is' a crime
11.24.04 (10:17 am)   [edit]
Analysis: Diplomatic Editor Trevor Royle on the implications of shooting dead a wounded Iraqi in cold blood

Crime came to the city of Fallujah last week and it was committed under the unforgiving gaze of a television camera, giving it international prominence. When a tense and battle-weary US Marine lifted his assault rifle and fired at a wounded Iraqi, killing him instantly during mopping up operations, he was not only doing a bad thing, he was breaking the law as it is applied to the business of warfare.

The US has not signed up to the International Criminal Court, precisely because it wants to protect its troops from prosecution in peace enforcement operations, but the assault on Fallujah was part of a series of military operations in an internal war and should therefore be subject to the 1949 Geneva Conventions.

Having been outed on the lack of weapons of mass destruction President George W Bush hides behind the fig-leaf of the interventionist war: it was right to mount a pre-emptive strike against a greater threat, in this case Saddam Hussein. Prime Minister Tony Blair has fallen in line with the policy and sees no reason to change his mind. The intervention in Iraq might be unpopular, the UN secretary-general, Kofi Annan, has called it “illegal”, but both leaders say that it is a just conflict.

However, if US and British soldiers are engaged in a war – Blair claims that it is now in its second phase – then rules must apply. So far, the US has shown little inclination to pay heed to the Geneva Conventions, witness the treatment of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib and the impending appointment of Albert Gonzales as attorney-general. This is the lawyer who advised the Bush administration that the Geneva Conventions were irrelevant because the war against terrorism “renders quaint some of its provisions”. Small wonder that US defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld nodded in agreement because it gave his soldiers carte blanche to act as they saw fit and not as they should. But even if international law has been abandoned, the murder of Iraqis cannot be condoned. Throughout last week’s fighting in Fallujah, US commanders insisted that it was a joint operation with the Iraqis and that it was being undertaken at the request of Iyad Allawi’s interim government. If that is the case, then the US forces were acting in support of the civil authorities and, by right, should be subject to its laws. Any soldier breaking that code would be handed over to the Iraqi police for criminal investigation.
Sunday Herald

 
Palestinians called 'stinking animals' on MSNBC's Imus
11.24.04 (10:03 am)   [edit]
I actually see this kind of thing several times a week. Having been a victim of racism that cost me more than I want to relate here I have a tendency to spot it before others do. I hear it in seemingly trivial conversation spoken by people who just don't get it...they don't realize the racism behind their words. I've even had comments within tblog that resemble the words spoken below. Of course, MSNBC knows racism and certainly knew these comments would be more than offensive to the Arab, Muslim population. Not just Muslims but all of us should let MSNBC know how offended and appalled we are by this behavior.

ACTION REQUESTED: (As always, be POLITE and RESPECTFUL.)
Contact NBC and MSNBC to demand an apology and a reprimand for all those involved in the program.

CONTACT:

Mr. Neal Shapiro
President
NBC
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112-0002

FAX: 212-664-2264

Mr. Rick Kaplan
President
MSNBC
1 MSNBC Plaza
Secaucus, NJ 07094-2419

E-MAIL: rick.kaplan@msnbc.com, neal.shapiro@nbc.com
COPY TO: imus@msnbc.com, fccinfo@fcc.gov

A prominent national Islamic civil rights and advocacy group today called for an apology from the MSNBC cable television network over comments on its "Imus in the Morning" program that referred to Palestinians as "stinking animals" and suggested that they all be killed.

The Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) also urged that the program's host, Don Imus, be reprimanded for failing to challenge his colleagues’ inflammatory remarks. CAIR, which says it received numerous complaints about the comments, quoted a transcript of Imus’ November 12th program in which he and his on-air colleagues engaged in the following discussion about live coverage of Palestinian President Yasser Arafat's funeral:

DON IMUS: They're (the Palestinians) eating dirt and that fat pig wife of his is living in Paris.
COLLEAGUE: They’re all brainwashed, though. That’s what it is. And they're stupid, to begin with, but they’re brainwashed now. Stinking animals. They ought to drop the bomb right there, kill ‘em all right now…
IMUS: Well, the problem is we have (reporter) Andrea (Mitchell) there; we don't want anything to happen to her.
COLLEAGUE: Oh, she's got to get out. Andrea, get out and then drop the bomb and kill everybody…
COLLEAGUE: Look at this. Animals. Animals!
CAIR

 
Who killed Margeret Hassan?
11.24.04 (9:32 am)   [edit]
I haven't read Robert Fisk latest article concerning Margeret Hassan. But Linda Heard has written When Seeing is Not Believing in which she highlights part of his text and ask the question many of us are asking. Who killed Margeret Hassan? If you're not pondering the incongruities of her death you should be.

British journalist Robert Fisk cleverly highlights the strange circumstances surrounding Margaret’s kidnapping in a recent article. He writes: “So, if anyone doubted the murderous nature of the insurgents, what better way to prove their viciousness than to produce evidence of Margaret Hassan’s murder?” He concludes with the thought-provoking question: “Who gains from Margaret Hassan’s death?

Certainly not the insurgency. Mrs. Hassan was married to an Iraqi, had dual British-Iraqi nationality, spoke fluent Arabic and was a convert to Islam. She had spent some 30 years caring for the Iraqi people and had been a vehement opponent of the US-led sanctions and invasion. So why was she taken in the first place? Even Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi’s ruthless band of thugs urged her immediate release.”

Every crime has a motive. In the case of Mrs. Hassan it is difficult to see what this could be from the point of view of the resistance.

When compared to previous militant tapes, the videos of Mrs. Hassan pleading for her life were unique. There were no banners, no armed, masked men in the background, no claims of responsibility, and, in a departure from the usual decapitation, Margaret was hooded and shot.
 
Half of Palestinians Live in Poverty, Report Says
11.23.04 (10:59 am)   [edit]
Note the word 'survive.' Could you survive on less than $2 a day in your economy?

Despite a slowdown in fighting, the Palestinian economy remains crippled by four years of conflict with Israel and nearly half the population survives on less than $2 a day, the World Bank said.
LA Times

 
Allbritton on the death of Arafat
11.23.04 (10:40 am)   [edit]
Christopher Allbritton has written an very interesting piece on the Death of Arafat.

A few paragraphs I found interesting and relevant in light of the election coming up.

Arafat's death is an opportunity for Islamic hardliners in Hamas, Islamic Jihad and other fundamentalist groups. Americans are warned by the Lebanese government not to enter Ein al-Helweh, Lebanon's largest camp, because Islamic fundamentalists who follow the wahhabist sect of Islam are recruiting among the 90,000 refugees packed into six square kilometers. Groups affiliated with Osama bin Laden's al-Qa'ida and Abu Massoud al-Zarqawi's allied group in Iraq are said to be jockeying for influence against the more established Islamic groups such as Hamas and Islamic Jihad as well as Arafat's nationalist and secular Fattah faction.

Abu Ardat warned that the vacuum of Arafat's personality would leave an opening for other groups to try to gain influence. "He had his special methods to keep control," he said obliquely. But he blamed any rise in Islamic fundamentalism on the failure of the peace process and the Israelis. "When you have a peace process and it stalemates, the more extreme forces become stronger," he said.

These Islamist groups have two assets, said Soheil al-Natour, a central committee member of the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine. They have a culture of vendetta and revenge, and they have a lot of money. If Mahmoud Abbas fails in the eyes of the refugees, the Islamist will be there waiting to exert their influence, said al-Natour. Camps such as Ein al-Helweh harbor the fundamentalist, he said, and that men like Muqdah work with them for operation inside Israel. If Palestinians feel their national cause is not being advanced by the new PLO leadership, they will turn to the Islamic cause to return them home.

Any sense of betrayal by the new leadership has the potential to send refugees into the arms of others who say they will advance the cause. These seducers whisper, if nationalism and pan-Arabism have failed you, Islam will not.

Death of Arafat
 
Rightwing Republicans say boot UN out of US
11.23.04 (9:41 am)   [edit]
I have to say I laughed when reading this but only for a moment. Is it any wonder so many are frightened and depressed about the direction America has taken. I see and read many bloggers that worked hard to remove George Bush from office floundering now because of a feeling of hopelessness. There seems to be no way to stop the facist machine.
Will these people actually suceed in their endeavor to oust the UN? The UN needs improvement no doubt, but this is outrageous. It's like throwing out the baby with the bathwater.
I'm absolutely ecstatic that I live in France and can continue to fight this ignorance without fear of hinderance. I'm not sure this will be true for US citizens in the future.

A rightwing Republican group on Monday has launched a television campaign calling for the United Nations (UN) to be kicked out of the United States (US), alleging the world body is a "safe harbour" for terrorism.

California-based Move America Forward wants the world body's New York headquarters shut down and its officials expelled from the country because it failed to support the US-led war on Iraq.

The advertisement, which Move America Forward officials said would begin airing nationally next week, calls for Americans to sign a petition calling for the United Nations to be booted off US soil.

It comes amid resentment from US conservatives over the UN refusal to fully back US President George Bush's decision to attack Iraq on the grounds that it had weapons of mass destruction, which were never came to light.

In addition, the group's petition drive, directed at UN Secretary General Kofi Annan and Bush, also calls for "a thorough review of the US financial contributions to the UN with a goal of a more equitable payment schedule."

"Until that review is concluded, eliminate all the payments made by the United States to the United Nations," the petition states.

Move America Forward's claims to be a "non-partisan, not-for-profit organisation" committed to backing the US war on terror and supporting its troops.

It is run by former Republican party politicans and a conservative talk show host and campaigned furiously against outspoken liveral US filmmaker Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11," which denounced Bush's war on Iraq.

IOL


The U.N. World Food Program Monday began shipping the first U.S.-sponsored food aid to nearly 200,000 Sudanese refugees in eastern Chad in a convoy of 350 trucks stretching more than half a mile.

The food shipment, which the WFP said would last about two months, includes sorghum, cornmeal, lentils, vegetable oil and a corn-soya blend. It will arrive at a particularly critical time for refugees, as eastern Chad suffered a poor harvest this year and large swaths of the local sorghum and millet crop were damaged by swarms of locusts from Egypt in recent days.

"This donation will go a substantial way to relieving the suffering of the thousands of people who have been forced not only out of their homes, but out of their country," said Tony Hall, U.S. ambassador to the U.N. Agencies for Food and Agriculture.

UN ships food to Darfur refugees in Chad
 
Ukrainians protest election 'fix'
11.23.04 (9:14 am)   [edit]
I'm going to leave the feelings I had while reading this as concerning the recent US election to others accept to say, when Americans have lived without true democracy for awhile perhaps their spirits will re-awaken.

Ukraine was perilously close to civil conflict last night after the democratic opposition refused to recognise the regime's candidate as the victor in an election that will determine whether the country deepens its fragile democracy, and tilts towards the West, or heads down the autocratic route of its northern neighbour and former master, Russia.

Tens of thousands of Ukrainians thronged the streets of the country's capital, Kiev, and other major cities yesterday to denounce alleged fraud in the presidential elections.

The opposition and western election monitors accused the government of dirty tricks before and massive fraud during the poll to tip the victory to Mr Yanukovych by 3 per cent. In many polling stations where Mr Yanukovych gained most votes, more than 100 per cent of voters apparently turned out.

Senator Richard Lugar, chairman of the US Senate's Foreign Relations Committee, said in Kiev that there had been "a concerted and forceful programme of election-day fraud and abuse" and called on the outgoing President, Leonid Kuchma, "to review all of this and take decisive action in the best interests of the country". The EU also said Ukrainian ambassadors would be summoned to capitals of its member states and briefed about its "serious concerns".
Independent


Interesting piece about Ukraine political history.
Independent
 
Fatah backs Abbas as Palestinian president
11.23.04 (8:59 am)   [edit]
The Palestinian political faction, Fatah, has named former Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas as its candidate to succeed the late Yasser Arafat in the presidential election scheduled for January 9th. The announcement confirms Abbas as the frontrunner in the ballot, despite his lack of grassroots support. His nomination by Fatah should be confirmed at a meeting of the Revolutionary Council on Thursday.

The 69-year-old moderate is favoured by Israel and the United States. On Monday Abbas met the outgoing US secretary of state, in Jericho. Colin Powell, on his first visit to the region for 18 months, reiterated Washington's support for the forthcoming elections.

He also secured an agreement from Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon to allow Palestinians greater freedom of movement to ensure all were able to vote.

EuroNews
 
US threats and EU incentives to Iran
11.23.04 (8:53 am)   [edit]
In an eerie repetition of the prelude to the Iraq war, hawks in the administration and Congress are trumpeting ominous disclosures about Iran's nuclear capacities to make the case that Iran is a threat that must be confronted, either by economic sanctions, military action, or "regime change."

But Britain, France and Germany are urging diplomacy, placing their hopes in a deal they brokered last week in which Iran agreed to suspend its uranium enrichment program in return for discussions about future economic benefits.

Secretary of State Colin L. Powell thrust himself into the debate on Wednesday by commenting to reporters that fresh intelligence showed that Iran was "actively working" on a program to enable its missiles to carry nuclear bombs, a development he said "should be of concern to all parties."

The disclosures alluded to by Mr. Powell were seen by hard-liners in the administration as another sign of Iranian perfidy, and by Europeans as nothing new.

Richard Haass, the president of the Council on Foreign Relations and a former policy and planning director under Secretary Powell, said he favored a major effort to offer incentives to moderate Iran's behavior, combined with threats of tough action if it does not.

European leaders say they want the United States to join with them in offering economic incentives to Iran, such as working to get Tehran to join the World Trade Organization - a step that could not occur without active American support.

Mr. Haass said it made no sense for the Europeans to offer incentives and for the United States to make threats. Both must be done together, he said.

NY Times

Iran 'ceases nuclear enrichment'

Iran says it is suspending its uranium enrichment programme, in line with a deadline agreed with European nations. The announcement was made on Iranian state television on Monday.

Earlier, the head of Iran's nuclear energy organisation said work would stop at two nuclear facilities in the central cities of Isfahan and Natanz.

Tehran agreed a week ago to suspend its enrichment operations in a deal with the European Union to allay fears about its nuclear ambitions.

BBC
 
Values folks still prefer their sexed up television
11.23.04 (8:48 am)   [edit]
Representatives of the four big broadcast networks as well as Hollywood production studios said the nightly television ratings bore little relation to the message apparently sent by a significant percentage of voters.

The divide between what people accept as proper in public and what they choose to enjoy in their private lives is, unsurprisingly, nothing new in the history of the world or this country.

"When the Pilgrims who landed on Plymouth Rock left behind writing, it was William Bradford's, and you can clearly see what they believed in and what their values were," said Robert Thompson, professor of media and popular culture at Syracuse University, referring to the colony's first governor. "Then you look at the court records and you see all kinds of fornication, adultery and bestiality."

Herbert J. Gans, professor of sociology at Columbia University and the author of "Popular Culture and High Culture: An Analysis and Evaluation of Taste," said, "For some people it's a case of 'I am moral therefore I can watch the most immoral show.' ''

They say one thing and do another.

NY Times
 
Goss memo wording called 'unfortunate'
11.23.04 (8:42 am)   [edit]
I would say, John Goss is a very unfortunate choice for Director of the CIA and that's being generous. Looks like you're in good hands America.

Supporters of reform at the CIA Sunday criticized what Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., called the "unfortunate" wording of a memo from newly appointed Director of Central Intelligence Porter Goss in which staff at the agency were told that their job was to "support the administration."

The memo, circulated via e-mail to staff last week after the sudden and angry resignations of the senior management team at the agency's clandestine service, laid down what Goss called "the rules of the road."

Attention immediately focused on a single passage in which Goss writes: "We support the administration and its policies in our work. As agency employees, we do not identify with, support or champion opposition to the administration or its policies.

"What does 'support the administration ... in our work' mean? If it means support in the sense of cheerleading -- that's a problem. But if it means by providing intelligence, there's another problem, because he says in the next line that the agency doesn't 'support ... opposition.'

"Does that mean he won't provide intelligence to Democrats if they use it to disagree with or criticize administration policy?" Suzanne Spaulding, former Democratic staff director of the House Intelligence Committee asked.

UPI
 
Anti-abortion tucked in with spending bill
11.23.04 (8:37 am)   [edit]
House and Senate negotiators have tucked a potentially far-reaching anti-abortion provision into a $388 billion must-pass spending bill.

The provision could affect millions of American women, according to Senator Barbara Boxer, Democrat of California, who warned Friday that she would use procedural tactics to slow Senate business to a crawl if the language was not altered.

"I am willing to stand on my feet and slow this thing down," Ms. Boxer said.

"Everyone wants to go home, I know that, and I know I will not win a popularity contest in the Senate. But they should not be doing this. On a huge spending bill they're writing law, and they're taking away rights from women."

Ms. Boxer said that she complained to Senator Ted Stevens, the Alaska Republican who is the chairman of the Appropriations Committee, but that he told her that House Republican leaders insisted that the provision, which was approved by the House in July but never came to the Senate for a vote, be included in the measure.

"He said, 'Senator, they want it in, and it's going in,' " Ms. Boxer recalled.

NY Times
 
EU ministers approve rapid reaction force
11.23.04 (8:31 am)   [edit]
European Union defence ministers have agreed to set up a military rapid reaction force to be deployed at short notice to conflicts around the world. The force will consist of a number of units each made up of 1500 troops. France, Italy, Britain and Spain will each form a unit, and other EU states will be expected to contribute troops. Ministers expect the first of the battle groups to be operational by next year, with eight more by 2007. The development is part of an EU effort to develop an independent defence capacity that can be deployed outside of US-led Nato missions.

DW-World

For more on this read:

Independent
Guardian

 
US Congress halts funds for new nukes
11.23.04 (8:20 am)   [edit]
This makes for good morning news. Let's hope Bush doesn't find a way to bypass Congress and push through his bill anyway.

The US Congress has denied the Bush administration funds to study a new generation of nuclear weapons.

Omitting $36.6 million from a huge $388 billion spending bill it passed over the weekend, lawmakers on Monday said the technology would encourage other nations to go nuclear.

Such bunker-busting nuclear weapons, packing half the power of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima in the second world war, would be used to destroy underground facilities as well as smaller nuclear arms.

The White House said it had no plans to build such weapons, but wanted to keep the door open to their development to deal with emerging threats.

Democrats said just considering the weapons takes nuclear warfare out of the realm of the unthinkable.

"If we are to convince other countries to forego nuclear weapons, we cannot be preparing to build an entire new generation of nuclear weapons here in the US," said Representative Ed Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat.

Markey said this "should send a strong signal to the Bush administration to drop this weapon from next year's budget request".

Aljazeera
 
If only we had known what Michael Ledeen would become
11.22.04 (7:58 pm)   [edit]
Ran across this at AntiWar.Blog.


Consider the story of Henry Tandey, a British infantryman in the Duke of Wellington Regiment in the First World War. On September 28, 1918, Tandey participated in an attack against enemy trenches near the small French town of Marcoing. The British carried the day, and as they advanced, Tandey Cautiously peered into a trench. He saw an enemy soldier, a corporal, lying bleeding on the ground. It would have been easy for Tandey to finish off his enemy, as he had killed many that day; Tandey had played an heroic role in the battle and later was awarded the Victoria Cross, the highest wartime decoration, for his great courage. But he felt it was wrong to shoot an injured man, and he spared the corporal's life.

In 1940, during the Nazi bombardment of Coventry, when Tandey worked as a security guard at the Triumph automobile factory, he gnashed his teeth. "Had I known what that corporal was going to become! God knows how sad I am that I spared him." The corporal was Adolf Hitler. Tandey's human gesture had led to the deaths of millions of people and, in a bitter irony of military destiny, had placed his own life at the mercy of the monster whose life he could have taken.

Murder is surely evil, yet every reasonable person will agree that the cause of good would have been greatly advanced if Henry Tandey had killed Hitler in that trench. History abounds with examples of good actions furthering the cause of evil...


Every reasonable person will know that what this writer suggests doesn't even bear considering. Why was Hitler even allowed to be born? Just think, if we had some way of knowing what kind of adult a person will become we could just kill off the bad ones at birth. Ye Gods!!
 
Arthur's Action: Foxless in America
11.22.04 (7:18 pm)   [edit]
Friends: This is such simple, brilliant, potenetially effective idea, I wish I could say I thought of it. It was actually sent to me by a friend who is impatient for grassroots action against the right wing to begin. I'm doing this at once. I hope you'll decide to do the same and circulate the idea to at least a hundred million of your closest friends. LET'S SEE THE STOCKS PLUMMET- FEED YOUR STRENGTH. If you, too, have had enough with the FOX news channel, please read below. This action will make your voice heard while simply choosing not to watch the station can not. (Coalition Member)

I have decided to make a political statement. I called my Satellite TV provider and asked them to remove Fox News from my television. Since the election I have wanted to stick my head out of a window of a tall building and shout I can't take it anymore, but I soon came to realize that there is a better and easier way to send a message to Rupert Murdoch and his blathering bunch at Fox News and that was to simply make them disappear from my life.

I called my cable TV provider and had Fox News deleted from my television. It was simple I called the Repair Department at Comcast and said I wanted to be Foxless in America. I then wrote an email to the following: Reed Nolte VP Investor Relations for News Corporation (the parent company of Fox News) at rnolte@newscorp.com and Brian Lewis, Senior VP Corporate Communications for Fox News at brian.lewis@foxnews.com and to top it off I copied rmurdoch@newscorp.com.

I told them that I cannot take the Fox distortion and biased presentation of the news any longer and that they ought to inform their sponsors that there are millions like me. I can't tell you the immense satisfaction I gained from becoming Foxless in America. I am asking you to follow me in this protest and let it be heard by all that want to control what we all see and hear. This could be a way to have your voice heard-Become Foxless in America. We can start a movement if each of you send this email to all the others you know who are fed up with Fox News.

Regards, Arthur

Check out this site: Do Not Concede
 
5 people dead over tree stand in Wisconsin
11.22.04 (6:17 pm)   [edit]
This is not something I would usually post about but I was so appalled by this I had to post it. I just don't get it. What does this say about the mentality of these people? Keep fighting for your gun rights folks. It may be you I'll be posting about one day. 5 people are dead including a teenage boy and for what?

A dispute among deer hunters over a tree stand in northwestern Wisconsin erupted in a series of shootings on Sunday that left five people dead and three injured, officials said.

The incident happened when two hunters were returning to their rural cabin on private land in Sawyer County and saw a man in one of their tree stands, Chief Deputy Tim Zeigle of Sawyer County said. A confrontation and shooting followed. It is not known who shot first, Deputy Zeigle said.

Both men were wounded, and one of them radioed back to the cabin, he said, adding that when other hunters responded they were shot.

The gunman was using a SKS assault-style rifle, Deputy Zeigle said, "chasing after them and killing them."

The dead included three men, a teenage boy and a woman, he said. The man who radioed for help was not fatally wounded. Some of the victims were shot more than once. All five were dead when officers arrived, Deputy Zeigle said. Two people who stayed in the cabin emerged safely after the shootings.

NY Times


 
Kevin Sites speaks out
11.22.04 (6:11 pm)   [edit]
It's time you to have the facts from me, in my own words, about what I saw -- without imposing on that Marine -- guilt or innocence or anything in between. I want you to read my account and make up your own minds about whether you think what I did was right or wrong. All the other armchair analysts don't mean a damn to me.

Kevin Sites Blog

Via boingboing
 
German Muslims march against violence and discrimination
11.22.04 (6:08 pm)   [edit]
My Image

An estimated 20,000 people have taken part in an anti-terror march in Germany. Many of those in the crowd were of Turkish origin. They had two messages: firstly to condemn violent attacks on Muslims; secondly to condemn the actions of some Islamic extremists. The demonstration in the city of Cologne is a reaction to increasing debate over the role of the country's 3.5 million Muslims in German society.



Euro News
 
Children pay cost of Iraq chaos
11.22.04 (6:03 pm)   [edit]
My Image

Iraq's child malnutrition rate now roughly equals that of Burundi, a central African nation torn by more than a decade of war. It is far higher than rates in Uganda and Haiti.



"The people are astonished," said Khalil M. Mehdi, who directs the Nutrition Research Institute at the Health Ministry. The institute has been involved with nutrition surveys for more than a decade; the latest one was conducted in April and May but has not been publicly released.

Mehdi and other analysts attributed the increase in malnutrition to dirty water and to unreliable supplies of the electricity needed to make it safe by boiling.

In poorer areas, where people rely on kerosene to fuel their stoves, high prices and an economy crippled by unemployment aggravate poor health.

"Things have been worse for me since the war," said Kasim Said, a day laborer who was at Baghdad's main children's hospital to visit his ailing year-old son, Abdullah. The child, lying on a pillow with a Winnie the Pooh washcloth to keep the flies off his head, weighs just 11 pounds.

"During the previous regime, I used to work on the government projects. Now there are no projects," his father said. When he finds work, he added, he can bring home $10 to $14 a day. If his wife is fortunate enough to find a can of Isomil, the nutritional supplement that doctors recommend, she pays $7 for it.

"But the lady in the next bed said she just paid $10," said Suad Ahmed, who sat cross-legged on a bed in the same ward, trying to console her skeletal 4-month-old granddaughter, Hiba, who suffers from chronic diarrhea.

International aid efforts and the U.N. oil-for-food program helped reduce the ruinous impact of sanctions, and the rate of acute malnutrition among the youngest Iraqis gradually dropped from a peak of 11 percent in 1996 to 4 percent in 2002. But the invasion in March 2003 and the widespread looting in its aftermath severely damaged the basic structures of governance in Iraq, and persistent violence across the country slowed the pace of reconstruction almost to a halt.

Violence has also driven away international aid agencies that brought expertise to Iraq following the U.S. invasion.

Iraqis say such conditions carry political implications. Baghdad residents often point out to reporters that after the 1991 Persian Gulf War left much of the capital a shambles, Hussein's government restored electricity and kerosene supplies in two months.

Washington Post
 
The Iraqi people shouldn't pay Saddam's bills
11.22.04 (5:57 pm)   [edit]
Jubilee Iraq, founded by Iraqis and citizens in creditor countries, calls for:
* Cancellation of all odious debt and reparations payments (around $160bn together).
* A fair arbitration tribunal, free from conditions and representive of Iraqi views.
* Sufficient debt reduction to allow Iraq to recover & prosper.
* You can: sign the petition online, write to your government, and get involved.

We have no other agenda, which is why people of opposing political views support us.

Jubilee Iraq
 
Paris Club to cancel 80% of Iraq debt
11.21.04 (7:26 pm)   [edit]
The Paris Club of creditor nations have agreed to cancel 80 percent of the debt Iraq owes its members, ending a trans-Atlantic dispute and probably setting the framework for debt pardons from other creditors.

Paris Club President Jean-Pierre Jouyet told reporters in Paris that the deal, which will slash Baghdad's debt to Club creditors to $7.8 billion (4.2 billion pounds) from $38.9 billion, would be put into effect in three steps over the next four years.

He said the Paris Club would pardon 30 percent of Iraq's debt to it immediately, an additional 30 percent in 2005 and the final 20 percent in 2008.

The United States had been pushing for a 90 percent to 95 percent reduction, but France had argued that, with the world's second-largest oil reserves, Iraq should not be treated like impoverished African nations that lack such natural resources.

A senior U.S. official said on Saturday Iraq's foreign debts had swollen to around $125 billion -- from a pre-war estimate by the IMF of $120 billion -- and a third of that was owed to the 19 Paris Club countries.

Reuters

For those of you who don't know...I didn't...The Paris Club is not a French thing although it does meet in France every six weeks. Find out more here.
 
It hurts but don't stop
11.21.04 (7:13 pm)   [edit]
Kerry spent months untangling the knots of his Iraq position while tangling new ones even faster. He pounded George W. Bush over the phantom weapons of mass destruction and he mocked Bush's confusion of Osama bin Laden with Saddam Hussein. Kerry said that Bush's invasion of Iraq was "the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time." So was he in favor of ending it? No, his position was that he would try, but not promise, to bring the troops home in four years. Four years!

Kerry's studiously confused position was not, or not just, a politician stratagem. It was an accurate reflection of the views of his constituency. Most of them deplore the war, but only a tiny fraction favor an immediate pullout. Anyone who opposes the war but isn't ready to demand peace needs to answer the question "Why on Earth not?"

The lead headline in last Monday's Los Angeles Times was "Iraqi City Lies in Ruins." That would be Fallujah, a metro area of 300,000 people that many Americans had never heard of until we felt impelled to destroy it. And our reasons were neither trivial nor contemptible. They followed with confident logic from the premise that Saddam Hussein was an intolerable danger to the United States. If so, he had to be taken down. And if that destabilized the country, we had to occupy it for a while and calm it down. And you can't run a national occupation with rebels occupying a major city, so you have to besiege the city and kill a lot of people and leave the place "in ruins."

An American general in Vietnam famously said, "We had to destroy the village to save it." This has become the definitive expression of the macabre futility of war. Last week we destroyed an entire city to save it (progress!), but our capacity to find that sort of thing ironic seems to have become shriveled and harmless.

Read the whole article Washington Post

I don't think Kerry would have won even if he had announced an immediate pullout of troops from Iraq if he were elected. America is going through some kind of change of life. I can't quite put my finger on it but it don't look good.
 
Freedom of the press?
11.21.04 (8:50 am)   [edit]
Jim Taricani, a television reporter in Providence, R.I., fell victim to a widening judicial assault on freedom of the press this week. Mr. Taricani was convicted of criminal contempt of court on Thursday for refusing to reveal who gave him an F.B.I. videotape documenting bribery and corruption in city government. He will most likely be sentenced to as much as six months in jail by a peevish federal court judge.

Neither Mr. Taricani nor his station, the local NBC affiliate, did anything illegal broadcasting the tape in 2001. It showed the mayor's top aide taking an envelope stuffed with cash from a businessman who was acting as an informant for the F.B.I. Airing the tape had no detrimental effect on the aide's trial. He was convicted and is now in jail, as is the former mayor.

What irks the judge is that someone leaked the tape against a court order that it be kept under wraps. The judge appointed a special prosecutor to find the source of the leak, but that inquiry turned up nothing beyond denials from the most likely suspects. The judge then started fining Mr. Taricani $1,000 for each additional day he refused to name his source, but that, too, failed. So now the judge has found Mr. Taricani guilty of criminal contempt.

That looks more like vindictive punishment than a continuing effort to find the leak. The judge cast his actions as necessary to uphold the rule of law and judicial authority, lest others feel emboldened to violate court orders. But there is a more important value at stake here - the ability of reporters to get information by promising confidentiality to skittish sources. In this case, the leak caused no harm to the legal system, but imprisonment of Mr. Taricani could have a chilling effect on journalism's ability to expose corruption.

NY Times
 
World's leading G20 economies meet in Berlin as dollar slides
11.21.04 (8:36 am)   [edit]
Finance ministers from the world's leading economies are meeting at the G20 summit in Berlin this weekend. On their minds: the falling dollar and the effects of globalisation. Allan Greenspan, chairman of the US Federal Reserve, has already warned that the US's current account deficit is unsustainable.

The US now owes other states more than five percent of what it produces annually in GDP. Opening the meeting Germany's Finance Minister Hans Eichel talked of the need to agree on a problem solving mechanism:

"We need an answer to the question how can we establish a working international framework for the solution of global problems? With this logic we also have to discuss the problem of the nation state. Debates about the worldwide consequences of globalisation show that many people fear the laws of national sovereignty. My estimate is that global problems won't be solved without strong nation states in the future."

EU officials are also alarmed at the euro's strength against the dollar, but economists believe President Bush likes a weak dollar because it helps American exporters.

Euro News

 
French soldiers shooting civilians?
11.21.04 (8:26 am)   [edit]
There's an interesting discussion ongoing here concerning a report by Parliament speaker Mamadou Coulibaly, of French soldiers killing unarmed Ivorian civilians.
The French government has of course denied this. I have watched the 100 mb footage also available at MetaFilter and agree with many others that it's hard to tell if the report is true or not. As the French are there as part of a UN peacekeeping force I have huge doubts that this is anything more than propaganda promoted by the government. Hopefully, we will know the truth of it later. Thanks to JoiIto for the reference.
 
The Spectres of Marx
11.20.04 (10:02 pm)   [edit]
John Richmond describes his visit to a local Indy bookstore in search of anything written by the winner of the 2004 Nobel Prize for literature. I mean this does say something about the writer eh? His friendly bookstore clerk responded with, "Would that be the Commie from Austria?

John says that over the years he has enjoyed the writers he has discovered through the Nobel Prize and doesn't judge them on their political views.

Friendly bookstore clerk: "The Nobel Prize winners are always Commies, you didn't know that? I used to have a list up here somewhere of the Nobel Prize winners going way back. I checked them off. Commie, Commie, Commie.

Now, although I do not specifically care about the politics of the Nobel Prize winner, I do know that one of my favourite writers, the 1998 Nobel recipient José Saramago happens to be a card carrying Communist; however, I also know that last year's winner, the brilliant South African writer J.M. Coetzee, is no friend of Lenin. Likewise, I think, with the 2000 winner Gao Xingjian. I don't know too much about the 2001 winner V.S. Naipaul but what I do know is that he is certainly no Commie. Neither was Alexander Solzhenitsyn, the famous Soviet dissident who won in 1970.

At a loss for words at my favourite bookstore and really just wanting a good book to read, I said, “I know nothing about Jelinek but I know J.M. Coetzee is certainly no comrade.” The clerk ignored me and carried on with his diatribe, listing off the past winners who were, according to him, “Commies” with a capital “C.” And he didn’t even mention Saramago. Trying to connect, I jumped in eagerly. “Don't forget Saramago!” Still, nothing.

Does this remind you of recent events and battles against the neocons as it does me?

Freedom is always the freedom to think differently.” Let us just hope that the freedom to be different can be protected from its modern enemies: the fundamentalisms of global capital and organized religion.

You must read the whole article at: Rabble News
 
We know Osama and Zarqawi communicating - read the facts
11.20.04 (9:30 pm)   [edit]
Is this for real? If I understand the english language Mr. Smith is saying, he 'knows' Osama and Zarqawi are communicating and it's based on 'nothing.'

Al Qaeda chief Osama Bin Laden and the network's ally in Iraq, Abu Mussab Zarqawi, are trying to communicate with each other even as they continue to elude US forces, a senior US general said on Friday.

Smith told reporters at the Pentagon that “we know for a fact that there are attempted communications” between Bin Laden, thought to be hiding along the Afghan-Pakistani border, and Zarqawi, believed to have escaped the US offensive in his previous suspected base of operations in Fallujah. Smith did not provide evidence for these attempted communications.

Speaking after meetings at CIA headquarters, Smith said it was doubtful whether these attempted communications — likely couriers carrying computer disks — had succeeded, considering “the huge distances involved in those lines of communication.”

Smith said it was unclear whether the attempted communications involved Al Qaeda giving Zarqawi instructions, but added it was unlikely Al Qaeda was in operational control of the Iraqi insurgency, which US officials have said is controlled primarily by Iraqis.

“I'm saying that there is a relationship between Al Qaeda senior leadership and Zarqawi. How to characterise that, we don't know yet,” Smith said.

“But I cannot tell you right now that Al Qaeda has said: `This is what we want you to do in Iraq.' ... We don't see Al Qaeda senior leadership as being a director of tactical level operations.”

Smith added: “So I wouldn't characterise it as giving guidance, other than broad philosophy.”

Jordan Times

 
Two interesting takes on the murder of Margeret Hassan
11.20.04 (9:03 pm)   [edit]
Today we read the female Polish hostage has been released. I'm happy about this but it makes the killing of Margeret Hassan all the more difficult to understand.

Seeking reason in Hassan death

Hassan killed after service in Iraq

 
Remembering Margaret Hassan
11.20.04 (8:29 am)   [edit]
By Lucy Colvin

I am mourning for Margaret Hassan. The day after her capture her picture stared out at us from the front page of the morning newspaper. Her fragile life remained in the news for a few days and then faded from the pages. However, she did not fade from my mind.

All other women previously taken hostage had been released and I had been counting on this for her as well, hoping we would hear news of her freedom any day. But when the United States invaded Fallujah I had a sinking feeling that this intensification of the war would be the end for Margaret Hassan. It was.

During her captivity, I felt profoundly disconnected from the apparent expectation that our lives continue as normal, while hers was subject to such terror. I did not want her to feel alone. I held her in my thoughts. I wanted to accompany her imprisonment in my mind. I tried to feel what it was like for her to be pushed up against death. The terror was unbearable to imagine. These methods of execution I thought went out with King Henry the VIII. The possibility she could be a public execution, on the Internet, to instill fear and terror into the people was mind-numbing to me.

My mind replayed – still replays – the horror again and again, then pushes the image away, shuts down and dissociates, distracts to something tangible here and now in my immediate physical sphere.

I am incredulous that an actual beheading can be seen, posted, for free, with just the click of a mouse, for anyone to see. "How morbid, disgusting and terrible," we say, yet many can't refrain from double clicking to sneak a peek. Or we turn away, do not want to see, but play the imagined image mentally, reliving the horror in our imaginations.

Margaret Hassan was a human ransom note from her captors. She declared their ransom, "Please help me, these may be my last hours. Please ask Mr. Blair to take the troops out of Iraq, and not to bring them here to Baghdad." We feel the horror of her fate. She is a poor battalion's weapon, her murder a desperate response to equalize the terror of incessant bombing and ripping of civilian flesh. Atoning for the ghosts of Abu Ghraib, I weep and allow myself to feel the terror of our country's rein that we cannot yet stop.

Our country is at war, dismantling tenaciously worked-for progress toward peace and equality in a paranoid configuration of divided states. Our country needs us to be the voice of Margaret Hassan in calling for a peaceful resolution to a U.S. war that has unleashed terror on the Iraqi people and twisted the lives of U.S. soldiers sent to fight them. American society eventually will have to deal with these traumatized soldiers, but that will come later.

The Bush administration has used 9/11 as the impetus to instigate wars and destruction on other countries. Let Margaret Hassan's murder be a call to restore order through humanitarian organizations like CARE, to which she devoted over 20 years of her life, and to giving leadership for rebuilding Iraq to the Iraqi people and the United Nations.

Some people would say I am letting myself fall victim to the terrorists who captured and murdered Margaret Hassan and the others before her. That we cannot let her murder sway the United States‚ resolve and course of action to fight for freedom for the Iraqi people. But to them I say that Margaret Hassan, other hostages, Iraqi civilians and soldiers from both sides, have died a tragic, senseless death. There has to be another way in the 21st century than instigating an unjust war founded on misinformation that led to a rush to war. Margaret Hassan's life compels us to try harder and find another way.

AlterNet.

 
Protesters opposed to Bush
11.20.04 (8:17 am)   [edit]
Yesterday, thousands of Chileans took to the streets of downtown Santiago for a government-authorised demonstration to express their disgust over the Apec summit, believing it champions a kind of capitalism that widened the gap between rich and poor.

But most of their outrage was aimed at Bush and the US-led war in Iraq.

Marchers held up posters saying “Bush, you stink”, and ”Terrorist Bush”. Some chanted: “Bush, listen: Chile is not for sale!” and “Bush, fascist, thief, murderer!”

“We have to do something to humanise this economic model that is now spreading in the world,” said Francisco Araya, an office worker who brought his two children along. “I do not want that for my family.”

Breaking News.

Expect to see Bush protested everywhere he travels except in the US.
 
How do we get along?
11.20.04 (6:39 am)   [edit]
Someone asked the question, "Can we get along?" He was speaking about the current internet war between the 'red' states and 'blue' states. Of course, the red and blue states will continue on as they have. They are part of the whole. I am not expecting to see a civil war in the states, thank goodness. But, I did begin to think of the disagreements between those that voted in this last US election. The discrepancies are not minor and there is little wonder why many are reacting to the re-election of George Bush the way they are.

How do we 'get along' with an unjust war that's killing more innocent civilians than anyone else?
How do we 'get along' with the threat of war if you're not with us?
How do we 'get along' with the leader of the most powerful country in the world who insist on using his religious faith to dictate the rule of law for all?
How do we 'get along' with censorship, racism, poverty and disease?

This is a political struggle and it's about time. I do hope it will be non-violent. But, I hope also that people continue to fight, not for their party but against injustice and corruption in government and around the world.
America has it's hand in every pie. It too late to say, 'screw you world.'
Many Americans realize this and because of it are using this site to apologize to the world that they were unable to stop the re-election of George Bush.

As you read the pieces of paper and signs held in their hands you can see some are afraid there will be reprisals against Americans. We know this is a possibility. Instead of viewing these people as what they really are..concerned citizens, they have been called 'sore losers' and 'whiners.' With this kind of attitude I don't expect to see much 'getting along.' If we are partners and I tell you something you are doing is endangering our partnership and you ignore it there will be a price to pay. Half the population of a country cannot be ignored and then be expected to sit down and just accept it. This is not democracy.

Winning does not make you right.
Losing does not make you wrong.

What's at stake in these times is too important. We must change the status quo. If we don't the imbalance we have seen in times past between the rich and the poor will continue to grow. With this can only come revolution. Can it happen in the states? Of course, if people cannot find common ground regardless of party.
It's harder for those that are materially comfortable I know. But, we must rip the mask off corruption even if it upsets our comfort.
If this administration continues in the policies of the past four years there is no hope of our 'getting along.' We have seen the enemy and it is us.
 
Iraq, Iran, Palestine - The Writing on the wall
11.20.04 (6:31 am)   [edit]
The writing on the wall has been clear as day for some time now concerning Iraq, Palestine and Iran. There was a bit of hope before November as we thought Bush might be defeated and his policies brought to an end. But, as I see it there is little hope for a better world as things stand now.

Take the first paragraph in this article from the AP. Iraqi forces backed by American soldiers raided one of the country's most important Sunni mosques as worshippers were leaving after Friday prayers — part of a crackdown on militant clerics opposed to the U.S.-led attack on Fallujah. Witnesses said at least three people were killed and 40 arrested.

For the ignorant out there. Some Muslims may accept the invasion of Iraq but you can be sure they won't accept the invasion of Islam. Of course, if Muslims were to invade Christian churches there would be a hue and cry such as we have never seen.

From another article: This week the Bush administration said Iran was actively trying to develop a missile delivery system for a nuclear bomb. The outgoing secretary of state, Colin Powell, told reporters: "We are talking about information that says they not only have missiles but information that suggests they are working hard about how to put the two together."

This is the same Mr. Powell that stressed so heartily Iraq's WMD potential before the UN security council isn't it?

From Tuesday's news: All the declared material in Iran has been accounted for and therefore such material is not diverted to prohibited activities," according to a copy of the report provided to the Los Angeles Times by a Western diplomat.

Many of us have been saying for the past year that Iran is on Bush's hit list. There's no doubt of this in my mind. The only thing standing in his way is Iran's possible nuclear capabilities. Got to get rid of this little hazard. Mr. Bush is so transparent and those that support him are either warmongers or stupid. This will not be another Iraq believe me. It will be nothing like Iraq. We only think we've seen horror.
Iranians certainly want to see more democracy but not the destruction of their country or their religion, which is Islam after all.

Now Mr. Bush is talking 2009 rather than 2005 for the creation of a Palestinian state. Would this be called a flip-flop and a major one at that? But, who cares about the Palestinians eh? Mr. Bush's concern is for Israel is it not? The Palestinians know they can't count on anything from the US. They certainly can't count on anything from Ms. Rice. I see nothing but more misery in the future of these people until Israel is allowed to wipe them off the planet with nothing more than a slap on the hand from the states. Shame on Arab states for not coming to their rescue.

The Palestinian prime minister urged the United States on Friday to stick to its original 2005 deadline for Palestinian statehood, arguing that President Bush recent proposal to extend it by as much as four years will give Israel time to grab more land in the disputed West Bank.

A top adviser to Sharon said Friday that peace talks could resume if the Palestinians showed some good will. What good will does he want? Arafat, whom he saw as the major hinderance to peace is dead. Hah! Mr. Sharon is just as transparent as his co-hort Mr. Bush.

Unemployment has spiraled since the outbreak of violence in September 2000, standing at 36.8 percent in the Gaza Strip and 22.3 percent in the West Bank, according to figures from the Palestinian Bureau of Statistics. Just what does Mr. Sharon expect these people to do? They have a major food shortage, no jobs and no freedom.
 
Be back soon! I hope..
11.17.04 (3:54 pm)   [edit]
Essential work has to be done on our server so I will be gone for a day and hopefully no more. But, as these things go it may be longer.
 
The Iraq Solution - Coming Sooner Than You Think
11.17.04 (12:25 pm)   [edit]
Professor Mark LeVine has suggested "Four Solutions for Fallujah" in language suitably West Bank and Euro-colonial.

One solution is based on a Syrian case. In 1982, Asad put down a revolt in the city of Hama. The Syrian army killed 20,000 citizens and flattened the city. The Hama solution was a "demonstration" intended to deter other cities from getting similar ideas.

A second alternative is the 2002 Israeli siege of Jenin. A highly criticized and brutal offensive, in the end it succeeded in wearing down the resistance and maintaining Israeli strategic advantage.

A third is the 1920 British experience in Iraq. A massive display of force on the resistance backfired and further inflamed anger against the British. After losing 3,000 of 50,000 troops, the British withdrew later that year. The 1920 expulsion is known in Iraq as Ath Thawra al Iraqiyya al Kubra, or the Great Iraqi Revolution, and it unified the country across religious and ethnic lines.

A fourth alternative put forth by LeVine is "the more unsettling 'French' scenario" where "... a growing awareness of the human toll of the occupation, coupled with levels of political corruption that are already staggering would lend force to a desire to internationalize the next phase of Iraq's transition to full sovereignty."

Continue reading The Iraq Solution - Coming Sooner Than You Think by Karen Kwiatkowski, Lt. Col. USAF (ret.)

Thanks to Friendly Fire for the link.
 
A freedom fighter or a murderer of innocent women
11.17.04 (12:02 pm)   [edit]
Is Margaret Hassan really dead? I have a hard time believing it. If she is I suggest those that consider themselves true freedom fighters for Iraq and not murderers of innocent women find these killers and give them the justice they deserve. These killers have only damaged your cause in the eyes of the world.
 
A few more words from our esteemed President, Mr. Chirac
11.17.04 (11:09 am)   [edit]
"To a certain extent Saddam Hussein's departure was a positive thing, " Mr Chirac says when asked if the world is safer now, as US President George W Bush has repeatedly stated.

"But it also provoked reactions, such as the mobilisation in a number of countries, of men and women of Islam, which has made the world more dangerous," Mr Chirac says.

"There's no doubt that there has been an increase in terrorism and one of the origins of that has been the situation in Iraq.

"I'm not at all sure that one can say that the world is safer," Mr Chirac says.

I'm not sure it is in the nature of our American friends at the moment to return favours systematically," he said.

"I am not sure, with America as it is these days, that it would be easy for someone, even the British, to be an honest broker."

You can see the interview with President Chirac on Newsnight on BBC Two at 2230 GMT on Wednesday 17 November, or watch it on the Newsnight website

BBC
 
Greenpeace to UN: no more bare bottoms
11.17.04 (9:22 am)   [edit]
For the first time in it's history Greenpeace was invited to speak to the UN General Assembly. Environmentalists and scientists have been campaigning to ensure the anniversary was marked with one of the most significant steps to protect the rich life of the deep oceans – a moratorium on high seas bottom trawling.

High seas bottom trawling literally ploughs up the ocean floor for relatively few fish and the fleets often target seamounts – the least explored mountains on the planet, that rise more than a 1,000 metres from the ocean floor. Seamounts are teeming with deep sea life, some of which is undiscovered by science and much is unique to individual seamounts.

Read Greenpeace
 
Mariam and Athra: Iraq's mothers of battle
11.17.04 (9:14 am)   [edit]
Mariam

Mariam's three eldest sons are foot soldiers in the Fallouja insurgency, residents of the city who joined the rebels. She is not ambivalent about their commitment to killing government security forces.

"A fatwa has been issued to behead any ING [Iraqi national guard member] that enters Fallouja and is caught," said Mariam, who like Athra asked that her full name not be used because she feared for her sons' safety. "We consider them traitors."

Her sons were not active in the insurgency until the Abu Ghraib prison scandal was publicized in April. Widely seen photographs showed U.S. troops torturing Iraqi prisoners, forcing them to simulate sexual acts and otherwise humiliating them in front of their peers.

For the mother of the mujahedin, inspired by a combination of religious faith and righteous indignation at the U.S. military presence, death brings glory.

Athra

A mother of two sons and two daughters, Athra begged 19-year-old Haider not to join the national guard, but he wanted to earn money and the pay was good: $350 a month.

"This was the only job he could get — he tried for so many jobs," she said, speaking at a cousin's house because she was afraid of talking about her son's job in her own.

"When he told me he was joining," said Athra, 38, "I knew it would be his end."

For Athra, the thought of rejoicing in her son's death is unimaginable. She says her nightmare jolts her awake every few days, her body shaking and sweating, her face covered with tears.

Just the sight of guardsmen in Baghdad brings tears to her eyes. She sees each as her son — vulnerable, disliked, a target. Twice she has been on bustling Haifa Street, in a heavily Sunni neighborhood, and seen the empty uniform of an Iraqi national guard soldier hung up like a scarecrow to warn off anyone from joining.

Read Iraq's Mothers of Battle
 
A few words from Chirac
11.17.04 (8:54 am)   [edit]
Asked how he would characterise the Anglo-French relationship, after 18 months in which the French have been vilified in some of the British press and the President caricatured as a worm in The Sun, M. Chirac said French and British relations had always been based on "fierce competition" but also an underlying mutual admiration. "I would say that the relationship between France and Britain is like a relationship of amour violent," the President said.

On the Middle East, M. Chirac said there was no question of any change of the French position, which rules out sending French troops to Iraq. "Like anything else, of course, that could change," he said. "But it would be completely astonishing if it did." He urged the US to "engage more closely" in the reconstruction of civil and economic society in Iraq. "The elections [in January] are all very well," he said. "But as things are, they may lead only to more divisions and more hatred."

Otherwise, he said, France planned to continue to argue its own case on the Iraqi conflict, without responding to the "insults" from the Anglo-Saxon world. "We had our own analysis of what the problem was and how to respond to it. Tony Blair respected that. Elsewhere we were bombarded with insults, but we did not respond and we will not respond. There was no whisky poured down the gutters in Paris."

Read Ignore the intellectuals
 
What drives the fighters
11.17.04 (8:49 am)   [edit]
In a statement that directly echoed George Bush, Qasim Daoud, Iraq's interim minister of state for national security, told a news conference at the weekend: "Mission accomplished ... Falluja has been liberated". He proudly recited the list of the dead - 1,400 terrorists, foreigners and Saddamists. And what about civilians, the women and children trapped in the fighting zone. Any casualties? He avoided the question.
At the same time, thousands of Iraqis demonstrated in Baghdad, Basra and Heet in support of the people of Falluja. Many were arrested, some were beaten. The US-appointed Allawi regime responded by imposing new curfews. The US military is still struggling to contain a spreading wave of resistance, in Najaf and now Mosul.

Around Falluja, camps have been erected to receive displaced women and children. Men aged 15-50 were not allowed to leave the city, so 150,000 wait in anguish for news of fathers, husbands and sons.

Will they survive the US military's wrath? Many will not. The execution-style killing of the wounded Iraqi inside a mosque by a US marine, captured by NBC television, was one of many, according to an eyewitness interviewed by al-Jazeera television yesterday.

Yet all members of Allawi's regime have greeted the suffering of Iraqi civilians with complete silence. The dignified voice of Firdus al-Abadi, spokeswoman for the Iraqi Red Crescent in Baghdad, has haunted us for days. Appealing for relief supplies, she said simply: "Conditions in Falluja are catastrophic." The Red Crescent suggested yesterday that as many as 800 civilians had died during the bombardment.

Read What drives the fighters
 
Fallujah, City of Death
11.17.04 (8:44 am)   [edit]
Listen to a live report on the current military siege of Fallujah, from Dahr Jamail an independent journalist, currently based in Baghdad Iraq. According to a Red Cross official in Iraq, at least 800 civilians have been killed during the U.S. military siege of Fallujah, which has destroyed large areas of the city and inflicted a humanitarian disaster.

This live report provides insight and context into the current siege of Fallujah, while questions the distinction between "insurgents" and "civilians" killed in Fallujah, created by official U.S. military statements and widely reported on major North American media networks.

Read Iraq Diaries
 
Pleas for Children Up North
11.17.04 (8:41 am)   [edit]
At 13, Grace was abducted by the Lord's Resistance Army rebels and taken to Sudan. That was 10 years ago. Several times she tried to escape but failed. She was once caught and almost killed by her "husband".

"They shaved my head and told me my family was dead and it was not safe to go home," Grace says. Grace, however, kept trying. During a brief ceasefire, she finally fled with her three children.

Grace's story is one of several highlighted in a new report titled Pawns of Politics: Children, Conflict and Peace in Northern Uganda. World Vision, a global Christian childcare organisation, published the report.

Read All Africa
 
Kevin Sites responsible for Marine shooting footage
11.16.04 (9:22 pm)   [edit]
Kevin Sites of Kevin Sites Blog is the journalist who captured the video of a US Marine shooting a wounded man in Fallujah.
His site, contains his diary of the action in Fallujah. It describes traveling with the Marines and encountering bodies of dead Iraqis along the way: "This one is dressed in clean white sneakers and athletic pants. He is on his back - his arms behind his head, his face seems nearly peaceful, content."
He also posts pictures of the Marines on patrol and, in off hours, displaying pictures of their families and their tattoos.
Nothing was posted on the weekend incident in a Fallujah mosque, however.
Gadsden Times

I read Mr. Sites blog and link to his articles from time to time. I've always considered him fair and balanced, telling it like it really is in Iraq.
 
Amnesty press release on war crimes in Iraq
11.16.04 (8:49 pm)   [edit]
Recent reports from Falluja raise serious concerns that grave violations of the laws of war protecting both civilians and combatants who are no longer taking part in hostilities (hors de combat) are taking place. According to the US television network NBC, US Marines left five wounded Iraqi men in a mosque after a battle. The next day, last Saturday, another group of Marines entered the mosque, and an NBC reporter saw one Marine shoot in the head, one of the wounded Iraqi men who was lying on the ground, with no visible weapons near him. The fate of the four other Iraqis is unclear.

US authorities have stated that that they have removed form the battlefield one soldier and that they will conduct an investigation into this incident. However, urgent measures must also be taken to prevent any violations Amnesty International said today.

"Unequivocal orders for the proper treatment of unarmed and wounded insurgents must be issued or reinforced to all US and Iraqi military and civilian personnel. US and Iraqi forces should be clear that under international law they have an obligation to protect and provide necessary medical attention to wounded insurgents who are no longer posing a threat, as well as to civilians," said Amnesty International.

"The deliberate shooting of unarmed and wounded fighters who pose no immediate threat is a war crime under international law and there is therefore an obligation on the US authorities to investigate all such reports and to hold perpetrators of such crimes accountable before the law. Such investigations should be open and transparent and the findings should be made public. Any potential witnesses should be protected."

Amnesty International had already called on US authorities to investigate an earlier incident, reported on the UK's Channel Four News, in which a US soldier appeared to have fired one shot in the direction of a wounded insurgent who was off screen. The soldier then walked away and said "he's gone".

Amnesty International is also calling on the US and Iraqi forces to ensure that all those wounded in fighting in Falluja, both civilians and fighters, receive prompt and effective medical treatment. In addition, urgent measures must be taken to address the drastic humanitarian situation in the city. There is currently no water, electricity or organised evacuation of the wounded, who have no access to proper healthcare. The Iraqi Red Crescent Society have been able to reach the hsopital on the outskirts of the city, but are still not allowed to deliver humanitarian relief or assistance to those in need inside the city. Most of the civilians in the city are reportedly trapped in their homes or hiding places. There are is no information of civilian casualties or injuries.

"There are acute humanitiarian needs within Falluja. Measures should be taken urgently to allow the Iraqi Red Crescent Society and other humanitarian organizations into the city."

Insurgents are also reported to have violated rules of international humanitarian law: "Commanders and fighters of armed groups in Falluja also have an obligation to respect fundamental rules of international law. Acts such as booby trapping dead bodies are also war crimes," Amnesty International said.
Amnesty International
 
Rashid Khalidi - Fallujah 101
11.16.04 (2:42 pm)   [edit]
By invading, occupying and imposing a new regime on Iraq, the United States may be following, intentionally or not, in the footsteps of the old Western colonial powers—and doing so in a region that within living memory ended a lengthy struggle to expel colonial occupations. They fought from 1830 to 1962 to kick out the French from Algeria. From 1882 to 1956 they fought to get the British out of Egypt. That’s within the lifetime of every person over 45 in the Middle East. Foreign troops on their soil against their will is deeply familiar.

Read A history lesson about the town we are currently destroying
 
Children pay the price of Falluja
11.16.04 (11:46 am)   [edit]
Alaa Barham slumps in his hospital bed and stares blankly into the air in front of him. Twelve years old and still deeply in shock, he can barely speak.

Alaa's family had fled the Iraqi city of Falluja before last Monday's all-out offensive began. He was happily playing with his brother in the garden of their uncle's house in a village outside the city. Then the rocket hit.

"My uncle died. They took us to hospital," he mumbles, speaking in little more than a whisper.

His brother lies face down on the bed next to him, a bandage round his leg, a tube feeding into his stomach.

Their mother sits on another bed, cradling her now fatherless two-year-old nephew. Across the room, another two-year-old lies on a bed in a nappy, a blanket covering one tiny leg. The other one was blown off by a shell.

Iraq's prime minister, Iyad Allawi, says not a single civilian has died in the assault to retake Falluja from insurgents led by Jordanian al Qaeda ally Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.

But the charred bodies in the streets of the city and the children in Baghdad's Naaman hospital tell a different story.

"Is this child one of Zarqawi's followers?" asks Nusoum Hassan, flatly, holding out her nephew's bandaged right arm.

"Is any of this his fault?"

"God, make the mujahideen in Falluja victorious," one doctor told the 22-strong medical team gathered in a corridor.

His prayer was echoed by Saria Karim Obeis, who fled Falluja's Jolan district, a hotbed of guerrilla activity, and now lives with her family in a tent pitched on the grounds of a Baghdad exhibition centre.

"We were displaced by the American bombardment. They bombed families without mercy," she says. "We went to the mosque as refugees and they sent us to this camp.

"I want God to make the mujahideen victorious against the American occupiers who have spared no woman or child."
AlertNet

Would you be grateful to people who have bombed you and killed members of your family? It seems silly to ask such a question. But, it needs to be asked. So many seem to think these people are different than they are. That they will be grateful to live in the dirt and sacrifice their lives and the lives of their families for a cause they don't even understand. So much for the battle for hearts and minds.
 
Make a memorial quilt for Iraqi children who have died
11.16.04 (11:27 am)   [edit]

One of the many quilt squares made to honor a life lost in the war on Iraq. For Baby Hamza who was killed in a bombing raid on the villages of Azizia and Tania, 25 miles south of Baghdad, at 2am on the night of April 2. Made by Suzy in Ohio.

because we might forget that they are human beings
we might forget that they are like us
we might forget that we came from the same place
we might forget them
we might forget us
we might forget
rehumanize Iraq
rehumanize them
rehumanize U.S.
rehumanize us

Join together with others who are shifting the meaning of collateral, from its association with the word "damage," to its other denotation of commonality, of a long lost blood connection. Help rehumanize this war by creating a quilt that honors those who have died. Let us show Iraq and the world that we are side by side in this pain and loss of human life, and that we will not stand for more killing. Rehumanize.

Be sure to look at all the beautiful quilts.
 
Arafat's brother dies
11.16.04 (11:07 am)   [edit]
My Image

Dr. Fathi Arafat, the brother of the late Palestinian president and the Palestine Red Crescent Society’s honorary President, died on Sunday in a Cairo hospital. Fathi, 71, was admitted earlier this month to a specialized hospital in Cairo to continue medical treatment for his terminal cancer and his condition was reported in recent days as "critical."

A Kuwaiti daily reported on Saturday that Fathi Arafat's doctors decided not to update him regarding the death of Yasser Arafat.
AL Bawaba

 
Sharon might allow Arab residents of Jerusalem to vote
11.16.04 (10:55 am)   [edit]
Addressing Sunday weekly cabinet meeting, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon did not rule out allowing residents of occupied Arab Jerusalem from voting in the upcoming Palestinian presidential election. Sharon noted that the Palestinian Jerusalemites have voted in past elections, and, as such, he is not ruling out the possibility this time as well.

They voted in the 1996 elections when Yasser Arafat was elected.

AL Bawaba
 
Arafat memorial and protest march in Dearborn
11.16.04 (10:45 am)   [edit]

About 400 people attended the tribute to Arafat.

At the Greenfield Manor, community leaders promised to continue the fight for a Palestinian nation and to one day give Arafat a resting place in Jerusalem. U.S. Rep. Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick, D-Detroit, pledged to work toward peace and justice on behalf of Palestinians.

"I come to pay tribute to one of the great leaders of the world," Rep. Kilpatrick D-Detroit said. "I come to let you know that he ... will always live with the Palestinian people. Palestine will rise. I strongly believe that peace in the Middle East is on the horizon. There are difficult days ahead, but the God we serve never gives up."

Earlier Friday, nearly 200 Arab Americans marched in the streets of Dearborn for the annual March for Jerusalem, which typically marks the last Friday of the Islamic holy month of Ramadan.

The plight of Palestinians in the Middle East and war-ravaged Iraqis fueled this year's event. "U.S. generosity, Israel atrocity," went one chant. "Free Palestine," went another.

"He's dead," said Zainad al Husainy, 16, whose family is from Iraq. "All we can do is mourn for him. But people who are still alive are living in pain."

"Arafat was obviously a hero for the Palestinian people, the man fought for 40 years," said protester Tom Jacobs, 52, an unemployed construction worker from Detroit.
Detroit News.
Detroit Free Press.
 
Gilad Atzmon, Israeli jazz star, praises Arafat
11.16.04 (10:17 am)   [edit]
My Image

While Yasir Arafat's death was met with a gloating silence by many Israelis, jazzman and writer Gilad Atzmon was one of the few who had something good to say about the departed Palestinian leader.

"It is clear that this man, this brave man, this hero, the biggest 20th century freedom fighter, went through a hell of a time," said Atzmon in a telephone interview from his North London home.

But Atzmon is not your average Israeli. In fact he takes offence at even being called Israeli.

"Let me make it clear, I am not an Israeli. I was born in Israel, for the first 22 years of my life I thought of myself as an Israeli. But when I realised what Israel was all about, I stopped regarding myself as an Israeli. I demand not to be seen as one. I am a Hebrew-speaking Palestinian," he says.

"For me it is clear that Zionism is a racist, nationalist and a fundamentally religious perception, and I don't want to live in a racist set-up," he says.

On his last album Exile, voted by the BBC as the best jazz album of 2003, he reworks an Israeli anthem written about the conquest of Jerusalem in the 1967 war, and adds the words of renowned Palestinian poet, Mahmud Darwish.

On another track on Exile, Atzmon took a Jewish song that commemorates the Nazi holocaust called Brother our Ghetto is Burning and renames it Jenin, a sad and soulful number dedicated to the residents of the West Bank refugee camp of the same name that was invaded and smashed by the Israeli army in April 2002.

Atzmon says his new album addresses the hijacking of popular music by American-led globalisation and big corporations.

"In my new album I don't attack Israelis any more than I attack the globalised world. I don't see any difference between the Israeli abusive treatment of the Palestinian people and the American abuse of the Arab world," he said.

Oddly, Atzmon thinks the re-election of George Bush is not quite the disaster that many believe it to be.

"They have elected a qualified imbecile. America is a superpower. No one can topple it. The only people who can topple America are Americans themselves and they have done it. They have elected a qualified imbecile to run their administration. They are getting involved in so many wars and they are far from being successful in any of them. This empire is falling apart," he said.
Al Jazeera

Learn more about Gilad Atzmon here


 
IAEA has given Iran a clean bill of health
11.16.04 (10:01 am)   [edit]
"All the declared material in Iran has been accounted for and therefore such material is not diverted to prohibited activities," according to a copy of the report provided to the Los Angeles Times by a Western diplomat. "The agency is, however, not in a position to conclude that there are no undeclared nuclear materials or activities in Iran."

Though the new IAEA report is a victory for Iran, the agency made it clear that suspicions remained. It said Iran would have to continue to cooperate fully to erase doubts created by what the agency called "extensive concealment" in recent months, including 14 instances of failing to report activities and material as required by the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.

The report's findings and Iran's promise to suspend enrichment could block U.S. attempts to refer Tehran to the U.N. Security Council for possible economic sanctions.

"Barring some new surprise, which no one expects, Washington isn't going to get anything close to a majority of the 35 board members if they force the issue," said one diplomat, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The agreement Iran reached Sunday with Britain, France and Germany to halt enrichment was at least as important in stopping U.S. action as was the report.
LA Times
 
Informant sets himself afire outside White House
11.16.04 (9:47 am)   [edit]
Mohamed Alanssi, 52-year-old father of six, set himself afire outside the White House yesterday. He was a Yemeni national who informed US authorities on terrorism activities. Alanssi claimed the FBI had not kept promises made to him in exchange for his co-operation which included an unspecified amount of money, US citizenship and protection of his identity. Alanssi claims his identity was leaked due to a sting operation he helped set up in Germany that led to the arrest of Mohammed Ali Hassan Moayad and he and his family have been harassed and threatened ever since. news.com.au
 
US Politics: Hunter Goss..they're dropping like flies
11.16.04 (9:35 am)   [edit]
They're dropping like flies after Bush's appointment of Hunter Goss as new CIA director. Guardian
Two top CIA officials have resigned amid reported disagreements with the new management of the US spying agency. Deputy Director for operations Stephen Kappes and his assistant Michael Sulick were part of the CIA unit dealing with covert operations around the world.
Michael Kostiw was chosen by Porter Goss to be the new agency director. Strange..
The Washington Post reports In late 1981, after he had been a case officer for 10 years, Kostiw was caught shoplifting in Langley, sources said. During a subsequent CIA polygraph test, Kostiw's responses to questions about the incident led agency officials to place him on administrative leave for several weeks.
As the new executive director, Kostiw would have a major role in budgetary allocations within the agency and personnel matters, including promotions, assignments and discipline. He would "manage the CIA on a day-to-day basis," according to the CIA Web site. He would work with a board that includes the agency's chief financial officer, head of human resources, chief information officer, and chiefs of security and global support.
Is having a dicey background record now one of the qualifications for holding public office in the states?
 
US Politics: Condoleezza Rice
11.16.04 (9:31 am)   [edit]
Foreign policy hardliner Condoleezza Rice will be replacing Colin Powell as Secretary of State. EuroNews The thorn in Bush's side is out and his most trusted leading lady is in. Hail, hail the gangs all here or soon will be. Some are saying Powell was nudged out the door and that Mr. Powell had been telling people he wanted to stay. I somehow doubt this. Powell's reputation has certainly taken a beating since he began working for this administration although he's certainly more popular here in Europe than Ms. Rice is. AP Bush will have his way no matter who holds what position. It just makes it easier when everyone is a yes man/woman. Rice's appointment still requires Senate confirmation. No doubt this won't be a problem.

Stephen Hadley will replace Rice as National Security Advisor. Hadley last year accepted blame for a reference to Iraq seeking uranium in Niger that showed up in Bush's January 2003 State of the Union speech and sparked a controversy after it was shown to be based on forged documents.

More political news: Powell, three Cabinet secretaries to depart in major shake-up of Bush team
 
Laughter Yoga
11.15.04 (2:24 pm)   [edit]
Anyone heard of "Laughter Yoga?" There was a program on television last night on the subject of laughter and health. From what I could understand a Dr. Kataria from India, also called the Guru of Giggling, began what are called Laughter Clubs that give instruction in laughing. Why? Because it's good for your health. I have to say, it looked pretty silly to me. But, I do know how laughter can be infectious so it probably works.

Dr. Kataria said something that struck me. He said people in India don't whine and complain as people in western societies do. There is less stress and depression in spite of the hardship they live in. He said they look at what they have and not what they don't have as we do. Now that's something to think about.
 
Has society become increasingly coarse?
11.15.04 (1:20 pm)   [edit]
Jeffrey Rowan has written quite an interesting article showing how the 'coarse culture' of today, that so many are concerned about, is a far cry from that of even 40 years ago.

"If it sounds like I am singling out “red states” in my examples--the cradle of the contemporary Republican Party--to some extent I am. I could just as easily have written about the violent response to busing in South Boston, or the rabid reaction to Martin Luther King’s 1963 march through Cicero, Illinois. I focused as I did because the preponderance of voters who claimed that “moral concerns” guided their 2004 vote, not only live in these “red” states, but moreover, many of them lived through the atrocities of the 1960’s. It is my continuing frustration that if the Jerry Falwells, the Pat Robertsons, the Trent Lotts, and the Karl Roves of the world ever expressed outrage over the coarseness and inhumanity of society during that era, I never saw it."

The Myth of our "Coarsening" Culture.
 
Its those red and blue maps again
11.15.04 (10:42 am)   [edit]


Maps and cartograms of the 2004 US presidential election results

Thanks to Paul for the link. A different way of looking at things. Very interesting indeed.
 
U.S. Pump Project May Be Linked to Quake
11.15.04 (10:07 am)   [edit]
A federal facility that pumps salty water 14,000 feet into the Earth's crust probably is associated with a magnitude 3.9 earthquake that struck the Utah-Colorado border this month, an official said.

I found this interesting because I've wondered what effect the bombing of Iraq would have on this kind of activity in the region. Anyone know?

ENN.
 
A child of Falluja
11.15.04 (9:49 am)   [edit]
My Image

A child lies in a Baghdad hospital bed after losing a leg in fighting in Falluja.
Photo by ALI JASIM

 
Rejoice not
11.15.04 (8:17 am)   [edit]

“Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth, and let not thine heart be glad when he stumbleth, Lest the Lord see it, and it displease him.” (Proverbs 24:17)

No Arab leader – and very few world leaders – evoke such profound love and admiration among their people as this man, whom Israelis consider a veritable monster in human form. The Palestinians trusted him, relied on him, let him make all the big decisions that demanded courage, derived from him the strength to defy the intolerable conditions under a brutal occupation. Now, suddenly, incredibly, they found themselves alone, like orphaned waifs, in a world changed by the death of a man who left a huge gap behind him.

What will happen now? Arafat has brought his people from the edge of oblivion to the threshold of independence. But the battle for liberation is still far from over. The new leadership will have to face all the problems that confronted Arafat, without the towering authority of Arafat.

Uri Avnery
 
A Man and his People
11.15.04 (8:08 am)   [edit]
Arafat's (and our) tragedy was that whenever he came closer to a peaceful solution, the Israeli governments withdrew from it. His minimum terms were clear and remained unchanged from 1974 on: a Palestinian state in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip; Palestinian sovereignty over East Jerusalem (including the Temple Mount but excluding the Western Wall and the Jewish Quarter); restoration of the pre-1967 border with the possibility of limited and equal exchanges of territory; evacuation of all the Israeli settlements in the Palestinian territory and the solution of the refugee problem in agreement with Israel. For the Palestinians, that is the very minimum; they cannot give up more than that.

Perhaps Yitzhak Rabin came close to this solution towards the end of his life, when he declared on TV that "Arafat is my partner". All his successors rejected it. They were not prepared to give up the settlements, but, on the contrary, enlarged them incessantly. They resisted every effort to fix a final border, since their kind of Zionism demands perpetual expansion. Therefore they saw in Arafat a dangerous enemy and tried to destroy him by all means, including an unprecedented campaign of demonization. So Golda Meir ("there is no such thing as a Palestinian people"). So Menachem Begin ("Two-footed animal…the man with hair on his face…the Palestinian Hitler"), so Binyamin Netanyahu, so Ehud Barak ("I have torn the mask from his face"), so Ariel Sharon, who tried to kill him in Beirut and has continued trying ever since.

No liberation fighter in the last half-century has faced such immense obstacles as he. He was not confronted with a hated colonial power or a despised racist minority, but by a state that arose after the Holocaust and was sustained by the sympathy and guilt-feelings of the world. In all military, economic and technological respects, the Israeli society is vastly stronger than the Palestinian. When he was called upon to set up the Palestinian Authority, he did not take over an existing, functioning state, like Nelson Mandela or Fidel Castro, but disconnected, impoverished pieces of land, whose infrastructure had been destroyed by decades of occupation. He did not take over a population living on its land, but a people half of which consists of refugees dispersed in many countries and the other half of a society fractured along political, economic and religious lines. All this while the battle for liberation is going on.

To hold this packet together and to lead it towards its destination under these conditions, step by step, is the historic achievement of Yasser Arafat.

Great men have great faults. One of Arafat's is his inclination to make all decisions himself, especially since all his close associates were killed. As one of his sharpest critics said: "It is not his fault. It is we who are to blame. For decades it was our habit to run away from all the hard decision that demanded courage and boldness. We always said: Let Arafat decide!"

And decide he did. As a real leader, he went out ahead and drew his people after him. Thus he confronted the Arab leaders, thus he started the armed struggle, thus he extended his hand to Israel. Because of this courage, he has earned the trust, admiration and love of his people, whatever the criticism.

If Arafat passes away, Israel will lose a great enemy, who could have become a great partner and ally.

As the years pass, his stature will grow more and more in historical memory.

As for me: I respected him as a Palestinian patriot, I admired him for his courage, I understood the constraints he was working under, I saw in him the partner for building a new future for our two peoples. I was his friend.

As Hamlet said about his father: "He was a man, take him for all in all, I shall not look upon his like again."

This is only a small part of the article written in June of this year. Read the rest here.
 
US Presbyterian churches threatened due to anti-Israel policy
11.15.04 (7:39 am)   [edit]
Special safety precautions were taken in Presbyterian churches throughout the United States on Sunday after leaders received threats that churches would be burned by Monday if they did not demand a reversal of what a letter writer called their "anti-Israel" policy.

The Presbyterian church decided in June to divest itself of companies doing business with Israel.The Rev. Nile Harper, head of a visiting U.S. Presbyterian Church delegation called on Israel to end its occupation of Palestinian territories.

"The occupation by Israel in the West Bank and Gaza must end because it is oppressive and destructive for the Palestinian people," he said .

He criticized as "unhelpful" the barrier Israel is building in the West Bank to prevent Palestinian suicide bombings.

Harper, of Ann Arbor, Michigan, warned that the General Assembly of his church, whose investments in U.S. firms total $8 billion, had instructed its investment agency to study the possibility of withdrawing its money from U.S. corporations whose products "are being destructively used against the Palestinians" by Israel.

Haaretz
Jerusalemites
 
White House orders purge of liberal Democrats
11.15.04 (7:23 am)   [edit]
The White House has ordered new CIA director Porter Goss to eliminate officers from the CIA who are believed to have been disloyal to President Bush or to have leaked to the media damaging information about the conduct of operations in the Middle East, according to former CIA officials quoted in press reports Sunday.

"Goss was given instructions ... to get rid of those soft leakers and liberal Democrats."

Why does this cause me to roll my eyes heavenwards and shake my head in scorn?

Newsday
 
I had a dream
11.14.04 (11:02 am)   [edit]
I had a dream early this morning. I had just moved into a a large mobile home. In the process of straightening up and getting settled in I continued frantically checking the doors and the windows. At some point I was in a room next to the front door and I heard a knock. I hurried to see if the door was locked and by the time I got there it was jerked open. There were two seedy looking men standing there. They asked me why I had moved into their home. I became very angry with them and began to shout, "It's not your home. You were not here and it was rented to me." I slammed the door shut on them and made sure to lock it.
I went back to another room where there were two people doing some kind of business. An older man began to say he needed to exchange some bills and such at the bank. I told him I had plenty of large bills on me because I had to buy some appliances and could help him. He handed me a large bundle of bills and pale blonde hair. I looked at the hair and said, "Oh my it's going to be hard to count all this." Then I saw the hair was bundled in packs worth $5 dollars each. I said I had never seen this before and he told me it was fine, he did it all the time.
He said it was time for him to leave. He opened the door and was stabbed in the belly. I woke up.

I don't dream often at least not dreams that I recall. I sleep well. I spend waking hours working on problems with myself and the world. Waking up after this one I knew immediately what it concerned. I blog about it all the time. Can you figure it out?
 
Eulogy for America
11.13.04 (8:43 pm)   [edit]
David Hoffman the legal editor of Pravda has written 'Eulogy for America.'
It broke my heart to read it. It begins like this...

The epitaph reads:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Born July 4, 1776 - Died November 2, 2004

Ladies and gentlemen, we gather here today to mourn the passing of the United States of America, a nation that once stood as a beacon light of hope for the world.

America was betrayed and murdered on November 2, 2004. Also killed during this time of madness were the following virtues: truth, justice, integrity, freedom, compassion, brotherhood, tolerance, faith, hope, charity, peace, and respect for other cultures and nations. These virtues are survived by their antitheses--deceit, injustice, hypocrisy, fascism, selfishness, hatred, fear, hopelessness, greed, perpetual warfare and arrogant hegemony.

Also murdered were seven platitudes, which parents once used to convince their children that America was a rational and honorable nation:

Read Eulogy for America
 
Digital Rebel
11.13.04 (12:46 pm)   [edit]
My Image

Digital Rebel (EOS-300D) My new camera should be arriving in the next few days. It's a present from my husband for my birthday. He's so sweet. So, look for new and hopefully better photos. Does anyone else use this particular model?

 
Hidden Homeless
11.13.04 (12:40 pm)   [edit]
I watched an interesting documentary by Kerri Burton the other night that made me laugh and cry. I laughed because it could have been me on the screen. These young women were telling my story in many ways. It takes the edge off of lonliness knowing there are others like yourself. They understand you.

Histoire d'une squatteuse (I have no idea what the english title is) is a story about London's hidden homeless. 'Hidden' because although they have many friends none know they're homeless.
They manage to live day to day from one friend's house to another bunking on sofa or floor. When there is no place you either walk all night, sleep in a car or abandoned building. They're tough and always seem together. They're envied by friends because of their freedom and devil-may-care persona.
One girl in the film said she never thought of herself as homeless and I related to that. I never did either. Probably because like Keri I had a place I could go but it was worse than the street. Also, when you're young things don't look as harsh as they do when you're older. You're resiliant. You live from day to day. Homeless people live in cardboard boxes don't they?
I cried because I knew for all their tough exterior they hurt. You never quite get over being an unwanted child. You never quite get over no one realizing you were a homeless child..always sending you back out to the street.
 
Taking Falluja
11.13.04 (10:47 am)   [edit]
Kevin Sites blog on 'Taking Falluja' is just as horrible for me to read as 'Murder' in more ways than one. As everyone knows I am against this war and believe it to be illegal. This does not mean I wish harm on these young men and women. I want them to go home where they belong.

They are extremely likeable -- these young Marines -- full of bravado and easygoing about the danger that surrounds them. Some thumb through Maxim Magazine, others the Bible while the wait patiently to reign down death and destruction on their enemies.

"We're going to let loose the dogs of war," says Staff Sgt. Mortimer, "before the Falluja offensive begins. "It will be hell," he says, smiling after.

Read Taking Falluja
 
Murder
11.13.04 (9:22 am)   [edit]
This is particularly for all you compassionate people sitting safely in your homes in front of your computers typing 'Falluja Delenda Est.' What goes around comes around folks. There is a penalty for murder in this life or the next.

"People in Falloojeh are being murdered. The stories coming back are horrifying. People being shot in cold blood in the streets and being buried under tons of concrete and iron... where is the world? Bury Arafat and hurry up and pay attention to what's happening in Iraq.

They say the people have nothing to eat. No produce is going into the city and the water has been cut off for days and days. Do you know what it's like to have no clean water??? People are drinking contaminated water and coming down with diarrhoea and other diseases. There are corpses in the street because no one can risk leaving their home to bury people. Families are burying children and parents in the gardens of their homes. WHERE IS EVERYONE???

Furthermore, where is Sistani? Why isn't he saying anything about the situation? When the South was being attacked, Sunni clerics everywhere decried the attacks. Where is Sistani now, when people are looking to him for some reaction? The silence is deafening.

We're not leaving the house lately. There was a total of 8 hours of electricity today and we've been using the generator sparingly because there is a mysterious fuel shortage... several explosions were heard in different places.

Things are deteriorating swiftly.

Iraqis will never forgive this- never. It's outrageous- it's genocide and America, with the help and support of Allawi, is responsible. May whoever contributes to this see the sorrow, terror and misery of the people suffering in Falloojeh."

Baghdad Burning
 
Secret Service visits Boulder High School
11.13.04 (8:34 am)   [edit]
Two secret service agents paid a visit to Boulder High School Thursday to investigate rumors that a high school band had been practicing a song that contained lyrics threatening President Bush.

The band, which had planned to call itself "Tali-Banned," was set to play a cover of Bob Dylan's Masters of War at the school's "Talent Expose" Friday. The final verse of the song includes the words "Your death will come soon." During the song, the students planned to use images of President Bush and war in the background. The band has since decided to call itself "Coalition of the Willing"

9 News

One would imagine the secret service knew they were not threatening Bush. This was a warning meant to put fear in their hearts and silence opinion.

Two Boulder High School teachers, who had planned on playing in the band, have decided not to do so.
 
Ball is now in US and Israel's court
11.13.04 (8:08 am)   [edit]
My Image

Their successors should do the same


After the Palestinian leader's death, the ball is now in Israel's and the US' court: It's not longer possible to claim that there is no negotiation partner on the Palestinian side. Arafat's successor will have to be dealt with in a different way.

During Arafat's lifetime, such arguments gave Sharon plenty of rope in his actions against the intifada. They also convinced the White House while most other countries -- especially in Europe -- continued to view Arafat as the legitimate representative of Palestinians, a representative Israel simply had to deal with.

Deutsche Welle
 
The rabbi who mourned Arafat
11.13.04 (7:46 am)   [edit]


Unlike many of his countrymen, ultra-Orthodox Israeli rabbi Moshe Hirsch is mourning the loss of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat, and he's not ashamed to admit it.

"I am praying for him because Arafat was a man who devoted his entire life to his people," says the 75-year-old Hirsch, who advised Arafat on Jewish affairs.

"I'm very sad as he was a great leader who always differentiated between the Jewish people and Zionism."

Hirsch says he regrets that Israel has refused to allow Arafat to be buried in Jerusalem, home to the Al-Aqsa mosque compound, the third holiest site in Islam, even though the same structure is revered by Jews as the Temple Mount.

Hirsch says he hopes that a synagogue will one day be built at the Muqataa near the site where Arafat will be laid to rest, in honor of a man that he considered to be a personal friend.

But he doubts that the Palestinian Authority will ever accept the construction of a Jewish place of worship in the occupied West Bank, especially at such a symbolic site for the Palestinian people.

Middle East Online
 
Terrorism to gain statehood not a new concept to Israel
11.12.04 (12:19 pm)   [edit]
Before Israel became a nation, two groups, the Irgun and the Stern Gang, committed terrorist acts against the then British government. Both groups ceased to exist after the creation of Israel as a state. Menachem Begin, who was later awarded the Nobel Prize for peace, is the same man who planned the destruction of the King David Hotel and the massacre of Deir Yassin. Ex prime minister, Shamir, was originally a member of the Jewish terrorist gang called Irgun, which was headed by none other than Menachem Begin. Shamir later moved over to the even more radical "Stern Gang." Shamir himself has defended the various assassinations committed by the Irgun and Stern gangs on the grounds that "it was the only way we could operate, because we were so small. Menachem Begin at one time had a price on his head of 2000 British pounds.

Menachem Begin

Yitzhak Shamir

I could point out much more as the information is widely available on many sites but to villainize these men is not my intention. I use them only to make a small point.

Are the activities of Hamas any different from those of the Israeli terrorist organizations that carried out assassinations, bombings and sabotage against British targets? Are their aims any different?

The use of terror in order to achieve statehood is not a new concept to Israel.
That is the point I want to make in this blog. Israel used terrorism in trying to gain it's statehood. It is still using terrorism today against the Palestinians.

Sharon is already preparing to nip any peace initiative in the bud with the same old rhetoric.."they must put a stop to terrorism." Hamas is already making threats. Sharon expects this and even I imagine is pleased as it plays right into his hands.

If the true aim of extremist in Palestine is to wipe out the Israelis it is just as much the aim of Sharon and his group to wipe out the Palestinians. The problem we have here is Sharon may succeed with the blessings of the US government. All it will take to suceed is for everyone to do nothing.

Hamas as far as I can tell is it's own entity. No one within the government controls them, in fact they are the main opposition group to the PLA. Arafat had no control over them although the two sometimes cooperated and certainly the Palestinian people don't. With so many now ready to applaud Arafat and his cause in his death I hope they will come forward with help for the Palestinian people who are caught in the middle with no place to turn.
 
Watching tragedy engulf my city
11.12.04 (8:15 am)   [edit]
I'm going to post this complete article because I know so many could care less about what's happening in Iraq except how it concerns the coalition and probably won't follow the link if they manage to read past the first paragraph. The Iraqi people don't matter. They are just collateral damage dying for the great American cause.

You can read a much more interesting take on this at BlondeSense
The original can be found at BBC

"I am surrounded by thick black smoke and the smell of burning oil.

There was a big explosion a few minutes ago and now I can hear gunfire.

A US armoured vehicle has been parked on the street outside my house in the centre of the city.

From my window, I can see US soldiers moving around on foot near it.

They tried to go from house to house but they kept coming under fire.

Now they are firing back at the houses, at anything that moves. It is war on the streets.

The American troops look like they have given up trying to go into buildings for now and are just trying to control the main roads.

I am sitting here on my own, watching tragedy engulf my city.

Looks like Kabul

I was with some of the Falluja fighters earlier. They looked tired - but their spirits were high and they were singing.

Recently, many Iraqis from other parts of the country have been joining the local men against the Americans.

No one has had much sleep in the past two days of heavy fighting and of course, it is still Ramadan, so no one eats during the day.

I cannot say how many people have been killed but after two days of bombing, this city looks like Kabul.

Large portions of it have been destroyed but it is so dangerous to leave the house that I have not been able to find out more about casualties.

Mosques silent

A medical dispensary in the city centre was bombed earlier.

I don't know what has happened to the doctors and patients who were there.

It was last place you could get medical attention because the big hospital on the outskirts of Falluja was captured by the Americans on Monday.

A lot of the mosques have also been bombed.

For the first time in Falluja, a city of 1,200 mosques, I did not hear a single call to prayer this morning.

I broke my Ramadan fast yesterday with the last of our food - two potatoes and two tomatoes.

The tomatoes were rotten because we have no electricity to run the fridge.

My neighbours - a woman and her children - came to see me yesterday. They asked me to tell the world what is happening here.

I look at the devastation around me and ask - why?

Fadhil Badrani, an Iraqi journalist and resident of Falluja

Do you feel safer now, America?
 
A car bigger than a Hummer
11.12.04 (7:27 am)   [edit]

Isn't this what we all want to see in our rearview?

The commercial version would not have the electronics designed to detect anthrax, the Kevlar armouring on the underside, the night-vision cameras and the 25-inch LCD touch-screen computer monitors. But it would be just as big.

Will it emit smokescreens and have electrified door handles and stuff?

A car bigger than a Hummer
 
Fahrenheit 451
11.12.04 (7:14 am)   [edit]


I watched Fahrenheit 451 last night on ARTE. I'm a science fiction fan and at first look this does seem like science fiction. But, as I watched it, thank goodness it was shown in it's original version..english, I began to see it's relevance in today's world. If you haven't seen it check your local video store.

Researching the movie I read: Developed in the years following World War II, Fahrenheit 451 condemns not only the anti-intellectualism of the defeated Nazi party in Germany, but more immediately the intellectually oppressive political climate of the early 1950's - the heyday of McCarthyism. That such influential social criticisms via fiction as Orwell's Animal Farm and 1984 and Skinners Walden Two were published just a few short years prior to Fahrenheit 451 is not coincidental. These works reveal a very real apprehension of the danger of the US evolving into an oppressive, authoritarian society that existed in the post-WWII period.

The movie is set in a totalitarian state where the firemen are men that burn books believing them to be harmful to society. Don't expect fantastic special effects. The movie is very surreal and meant to make you think and feel or it seems this way to me. The people seem stiff and cartoonish but this is realistic considering they live in a sterilized world where books are banned because they make you feel bad and think in ways that cause trouble. They are actually dehumanized. But, not all yield to mindlessness and civil disobedience comes in the way of rebels who each memorize a book. I will leave it here for those who haven't yet seen the movie.

Ray Bradbury wrote the book. François Truffaut directed the movie. It has been said Michael Moore got the idea for his title 'Fahrenheit 911' from 'Fahrenheit 451.'

This piece of news will go well with this blog.

More than 20 American TV stations last night boycotted a Veterans Day screening of war picture Saving Private Ryan because of fears that they would be censured by a newly aggressive television regulator over the movie's violence and graphic language.

"It would clearly have been our preference to run the movie. We think it's a patriotic, artistic tribute to our fighting forces," Ray Cole, president of Citadel Communications, which owns three midwestern stations, told the Associated Press.

But Mr Cole said fear of punishment from the FCC - and a belief among broadcasters that last week's elections revealed growing conservatism in the US - had forced the stations into caution.

I will leave you to your own conclusions.

An afterthought: Anyone who saw this movie knows it's very graphic and realistic. They don't want you to see war and dead soldiers as it may remind you of the reality of today's Iraq.

Fearful TV fails Private Ryan
 
UN appeal to aid forgotten disaster zones
11.12.04 (5:49 am)   [edit]
The United Nations appealed for $1.7 billion Thursday to help 26 million people suffering in some of the world's forgotten disaster zones.

The appeal seeks help for 14 crisis areas, 11 of them in Africa. Among the worst is northern Uganda, which has as many internally displaced people — 1.6 million — as Darfur, Emergency Relief Coordinator Jan Egeland said.

"It is mind-boggling how little international attention there has been."

"It should be possible for the rich communities to do this investment because I can, as emergency relief coordinator, see no better way to invest in the future than to save lives."

AP
 
Falluja a humanitarian crisis
11.12.04 (5:43 am)   [edit]
In one case, a pregnant woman and her child died in a refugee camp west of the city after the mother unexpectedly aborted and no doctors were on hand, Firdoos al-Ubadi, an official from the Iraqi Red Crescent Society, told Reuters.

In another case, a young boy died from a snake bite that would normally have been easily treatable, she said.

On Tuesday, a 9-year-old boy died after being hit in the stomach by shrapnel. His parents were unable to get him to hospital because of the fighting and so resorted to wrapping a sheet around him to stem the blood flow.

He died hours later of blood loss and was buried in the garden of the family home.

One mother and her three daughters had intended to flee but their home was hit by a bombardment earlier this week and all died, neighbours who escaped told aid workers.

At least 2,200 families have fled Falluja in recent days and are struggling to survive without enough water, food or medicine in nearby towns and villages.

But the biggest concern is people in and around Falluja itself -- they can't be reached because U.S. and Iraqi forces have set up a wide cordon around the city to prevent anyone from entering and any insurgents from fleeing.

It is unclear how many civilians are left in Falluja, but the U.S. military estimates 150,000, or half the entire population, have fled the city since they began shaping up for an offensive in October.

"We've asked for permission from the Americans to go into the city and help the people there but we haven't heard anything back from them," Ubadi said. "There's no medicine, no water, no electricity. They need our help."

AlertNet
 
Brown Arms, White Wars
11.11.04 (5:12 pm)   [edit]
I have to admit I know very little about the First World War. I know of it but can tell you very few facts about it. Well, today I received quite a few links that are enriching my knowledge of this era.
One I found especially interesting. Here are a few words from it. Please do follow the link to read Brown Arms, White Wars by Molly Amoli K. Shinhat.

Two and half million Indian soldiers fought in the Second World War.

--"In the First World War, troops from over 20 countries in the Empire served alongside British troops and more soldiers from the Indian Army fought in the Gallipoli Peninsula than did ANZAC troops." Did you know that?

Did you know that the last undercover wireless operator in occupied France during the Second World War was a Muslim woman, Noor-un-Nisa Inayat Khan? Undercover agent, multi-linguist, pianist, writer of children's stories, Khan once shot her way out of a German ambush. The second time she was captured, she was interrogated. They got nothing out of her. Finally, she was sent to Dachau and shot. She was 30 years old.

we're talking about men and women with brown arms, with last names like "Khan," "Singh," and "Ram." Many wore beards, turbans, spoke in Indian tongues, practicing and maintaining their religions -- Sikhism, Hinduism -- and dare one say it in 2004, Islam. They fought on land, in the air and by sea.

In today's world, people with such names and of such appearance tend to make headlines only in association with terrorism or religious fundamentalism, not because they've fought for freedom -- our freedom -- through acts as horrific, bloody, necessary and glorious as anyone else's.

What does it say about our culture, about our time, that we cannot collectively acknowledge in our ceremonies and monuments the debt we owe these men and women? What kind of democracies do not pay tribute to those who paid the ultimate price for their creation and perpetuation? Are we doomed to remember only those who fit the image of those we'd like to believe fought for our freedom?

If so, what kind of people does that make us? How democratic? And ultimately, in our own minds, how free?

Read Brown Arms, White Wars
 
Arms business stronger than ever
11.11.04 (8:57 am)   [edit]
Despite a minimal drop in the total number of conventional weapons exported worldwide in 2003, the United States and other top arms exporters, except for Russia, reported increased weapons deliveries for the year, according to submissions to the UN Register of Conventional Arms.

Europe emerged as the region that received the most arms. Exporters identified 28 European countries as receiving nearly 1,400 arms.

The United States and its European allies also did not shy away completely from delivering arms to tension-filled regions or governments with poor human rights records. Washington delivered loads of armaments to the Middle East, both to Arab governments and Israel. It shipped 85 arms to Israel and 404 weapons to Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.

France and the United Kingdom also supplied arms to nondemocratic Arab regimes. With the exception of sending some warships to Egypt and South Africa, Germany confined its exports to other European countries.

ACA

Also read this today. The French government on Tuesday announced a 1.2 billion euro ($1.55 billion) contract for the production of nuclear missiles by European Aerospace and Defense Co.

France to begin production of new missles

This just does the heart good. Imagine if all this money was spent on world poverty. Would the natural disastors that follow it, you know terrorism and that kind of thing, be alleviated perhaps in some small way?
 
Hajara Ibrahim saved from death for the moment
11.11.04 (8:33 am)   [edit]
Judge Mohammed Mustapha Umar of the Upper Shariah Court in Dass, a rural town in Bauchi state has thrown out a death by stoning sentence against Hajara Ibrahim.
Ibrahim, now seven months pregnant, was convicted of adultery on Oct. 5 by an Islamic court in the remote town of Lere.

President Olusegun Obasanjo has criticized harsh sentences under Islamic law but has not moved to ban them because states are empowered to make laws in Nigeria's federal system.

The introduction of strict Islamic law in the northern states in 1999-2000 heightened ethnic and religious tensions across the country, triggering violent clashes between Christians and Muslims that left thousands dead.

AP

I'm happy for this young woman but I wonder how many thousands who have not made the news are dying everyday in the name of religious extremism.
And people wonder why we're screaming against religion dictating law. And don't bother telling me that Christianity is not like other religions and would never be responsible for such heinous acts. Religious extremist of all kinds believe their cause to be holy and therefore above man's law. Of course, if religious extremist get control of a country they can always change the law can't they?

No matter what I post I can't stay away from George Bush and the religious right. They scare the pants off me. History has shown us the killing fields in the name of religion. Are we going to do this again in the US and in Europe?
 
Torture persists in US policy
11.11.04 (7:49 am)   [edit]
"Many questions remain unanswered, responsible individuals are beyond the scope of investigation, policies that facilitate torture remain in place, and prisoners continue to be held in secret detention," said Dr. William F. Schulz, Executive Director of Amnesty International USA.

"The failure to substantially change policy and practice after the scandal of Abu Ghraib leaves the US government completely lacking in credibility when it asserts its opposition to torture."

Amnesty International

When Mr. Bush talks of terrorism I scoff. It's the pot calling the kettle black as we use to say back home. For many around the world and especially in Iraq he's the most dangerous terrorist on the planet. I mean, he is terrorizing the Iraqi people isn't he? Oh yes, he says he's doing it for their greater good. There will be collateral damage but in the end these innocent people will have died for the great cause of Bush style democracy. They're terrified and would appreciate Mr. Bush taking his troops home.

Riverbend has a few things to say to Rumsfeld.

Rumsfeld: "Over time you'll find that the process of tipping will take place, that more and more of the Iraqis will be angry about the fact that their innocent people are being killed..."

He's right. It is going to have a decisive affect on Iraqi opinion- but just not the way he thinks. There was a time when pro-occupation Iraqis were able to say, "Let's give them a chance..." That time is over. Whenever someone says that lately, at best, they get a lot of nasty looks... often it's worse. A fight breaks out and a lot of yelling ensues... how can one condone occupation? How can one condone genocide? What about the mass graves of Falloojeh? Leaving Islam aside, how does one agree to allow the murder of fellow-Iraqis by the strongest military in the world?

The second thing Rumsfeld said made me think he was reading my mind:

"Rule of Iraq assassins must end..." I couldn't agree more: Get out Americans.

Do read her entire article here
 
Yusuf Islam awarded peace prize
11.11.04 (7:20 am)   [edit]
Yusuf Islam, formerly known as Cat Stevens, was awarded a peace prize in Rome yesterday for his humanitarian work.

In September of this year he was branded by the US as a potential terrorist risk and refused entry to the country.

Strange n'est pas? There seems to be a contradiction.

Guardian
 
Yasser Arafat (1929 - 2004)
11.11.04 (6:59 am)   [edit]
My Image

PALESTINIAN leader Yasser Arafat has died in Paris, aged 75. The official time of Arafat's death was 1.30pm (AEDT).



Arafat was born Mohammed Abdel-Raouf Arafat al Qudwa al-Hussein in Cairo, Egypt, on August 24, 1929, the son of a successful Palestinian merchant killed in the 1948 Arab-Israeli war. His mother died when he was 4 and he went to live with an uncle in Jerusalem, a city that was ruled by the British under a League of Nations mandate (installed after World War I). He took the name Yasser, apparently in honor of a slain Palestinian rebel, but to many he would become known as Abu Ammar, his nom de guerre, or al-Khityar, the wise old man.

It was during those years that Arafat was exposed to the clash between Arabs and Jews, particularly Jews who immigrated to build a Jewish homeland in Palestine.

While attending the University of Cairo, from which he graduated as a civil engineer, Arafat undertook a study of Jewish life, associating with Jews and reading the works of Zionists such as Theodor Herzl. But by 1946 he had become a Palestinian nationalist and was procuring weapons in Egypt to be smuggled into Palestine in the Arab cause.

When the first Arab-Israeli war broke out in 1948, reports say that Arafat slipped into Palestine to fight the Israelis.

An Egyptian-educated engineer, he served in the Egyptian army, was a student activist, and later ran his own contracting firm in Kuwait. There he also founded Fatah, which would become the core group of the Palestine Liberation Organization.

Hunted as a terrorist, hailed as a peacemaker, Yasser Arafat succeeded in forcing the Palestinian tragedy upon the world's conscience but failed to deliver the independent state his people yearned for.
 
Theo Van Gogh and extremist
11.10.04 (6:25 pm)   [edit]
Theo Van Gogh was murdered in Amsterdam Tuesday, 2nd of November. An outspoken and provocative film director Mr. Van Gogh was also known as an often offensive critic of Islam who once called radical Islamist immigrants "a fifth column of goatfuckers".

His killer, a 26 yr. old Dutch Morroccan was an associate of a radical group that Dutch intelligence has been watching.

The government labelled the murder an “act against freedom of expression”, and organised an Amsterdam rally against it. The protesters worried that the killing might be a sign that they are no longer free to express controversial views, or pursue the most outlandish lifestyles, without fearing for their personal safety.

Economist

The world has been dealing with extremist for generations. Muslim extremist are no different than any other. Their hate is based on religion.
The Aryan Nations is a racist, anti-semitic, white supremacist hate group. It is the political arm of the ''White Identity Church of Jesus Christ-Christian,'' long led by Richard Butler.
The KKK is a White, racist hate movement that claims to be Christian.
Neo Nazis are white racist hate groups that pattern themselves after Hitler's philosophies. And the list goes on.

The Southern Poverty Law Center's Intelligence Project counted 751 active hate groups in the United States in 2003. View a map to see their location here.
I was unable to find one for Europe. If anyone knows of one let me know and I will be glad to include it.

It's too bad that we hear more about Muslim extremist than we do Muslim reformist. They renounce terrorism, violence and respect the rules of democracy.
We see them hard at work in Turkey today. Their role in today's world is more important and will do more to delegitimize terrorism than Bush's wars.
Be careful that you don't lump all Muslims together as terrorist. You would be wrong and guilty of racism no different from the groups mentioned.

 
Need to dilute French military presence in Ivory Coast
11.10.04 (1:48 pm)   [edit]
My Image

South Africa's foreign minister said Wednesday that more west African troops should be deployed to Ivory Coast to dilute the strong French military presence there.

The Economic Community of West African States has contributed the bulk of the troops serving in a 6,240-strong UN peacekeeping force, which is being supported by the 4,000 French 'Unicorn' contingent which has been reinforced by several hundred men since Sunday. "There is bad blood between the (Ivory Coast) government and the French troops... If their people and troops are not pulling together, it becomes difficult," said Dlamini-Zuma. Tocqueville I agree. Colonization leaves scars that nothing can heal.
 
Frontlines of empire
11.10.04 (12:32 pm)   [edit]
Are there WMD’s in Falluja?

Is Saddam holed up in Falluja?

Do the people of Falluja represent a clear and present danger to the national security of the US or a tangible threat to its people?

Then what possible excuse is there to relentlessly bomb the city, cut off food and water, ban access to the city’s only hospital, fire on ambulances, precipitate a mass exodus of 300,000 people, and wreak death and havoc on an entire urban population. The siege is simply a muscle-flexing exercise intended to send a message to Iraqi liberation movement that Washington will not be deterred from subjugating the entire country. The message is clear; resist and you will die.

Read Frontlines of empire
 
Falluja's defiance of a new empire
11.10.04 (12:24 pm)   [edit]
The US generals will no doubt deliver Falluja to Bush and Blair after bombarding its neighbourhoods with artillery and rockets. But they are doomed to deliver neither the Fallujans nor the people of Iraq. Perhaps they are unaware that Fallujans defied Saddam's rule during his last years in power. Falluja - known as the city of a thousand mosques - attracted Saddam's wrath in 1998 when its imams refused to hail the tyrant in their Friday sermons. Many were imprisoned, and the city punished as a result.

But the generals certainly do know how resistance began in Falluja. On April 28 2003 US soldiers opened fire on parents and children demonstrating against the continued military occupation of their primary school - killing 18 of them in cold blood and injuring about 60 others. Until the killing of those demonstrators, not a single bullet had been fired at US soldiers in Falluja or any of the cities north of Baghdad. But, remorselessly, little-known Falluja became a world-renowned centre of defiance, where a poor and poorly armed people has courageously faced the military wing of the new empire.

Read Falluja's defiance of a new empire.
 
Another example of why the death penalty must go
11.09.04 (4:48 pm)   [edit]
Bruce Dallas Goodman, 54 who spent 19 Years behind bars for rape, murder being freed after DNA evidence clears him.

Read ABC

During George Bush's five years as governor of Texas, the state executed 131 prisoners -- far more than any other state.

In answer to questions about that record, Governor Bush has repeatedly said that he has no qualms. "I'm confident," he said last February, "that every person that has been put to death in Texas under my watch has been guilty of the crime charged, and has had full access to the courts."

Yeah, right George...

 
War on Iraqi human rights
11.09.04 (10:18 am)   [edit]
The world must not stand aside and allow the Bush administration to ignore its obligations under international law. We must call for greater protection of Iraqi civilians. We must call for an independent and public investigation into the reports of prisoner abuse, and for all those responsible to be held accountable. And we must demand an end to the Bush administration's ongoing disregard for human rights.

The "war on terror" can only be won through international harmony and full respect for the human rights of all. AMEN!

Read How the war on terror became a war on Iraqi human rights .
 
U.S. Judge Halts War-Crime Trial at Guantánamo
11.09.04 (10:05 am)   [edit]
Read A federal judge ruled Monday that President Bush had both overstepped his constitutional bounds and improperly brushed aside the Geneva Conventions in establishing military commissions to try detainees at the United States naval base here as war criminals.


Thank goodness someone is on the ball. Somehow since George Bush has control of the US government now I imagine he will stomp heavily on this judge in ways we probably won't hear about. All the Bush lovers will of course cry yea, yea.
Most everything George Bush has done has been illegal. The insensibilities of the Americans, who insisted he should remain President, to this is astounding. They don't seem to realize they also may find themselves a victim of this Presidents policies one day. Read Getting off a security watch list is the hard part.

 
Frank Gaffney's insidious checklist for the President
11.07.04 (5:36 pm)   [edit]
An influential foreign-policy neo-conservative with longstanding ties to top hawks in the administration of President George W Bush has laid out what he calls ''a checklist of the work the world will demand of this president and his subordinates in a second term.''

Frank Gaffney, the founder and president of the Centre for Security Policy (CSP), a ubiquitous ''talking head'' on TV in the run-up to the war in Iraq, sits on the boards of CPD's parent organisations, the Foundation for the Defence of Democracies (FDD) and Americans for Victory Over Terrorism (AVOT). He was a charter associate, with Cheney, Rumsfeld, Perle, Wolfowitz and Abrams, of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), another prominent neo-conservative-led group that offered up a similar checklist of what Bush should do in the ''war on terrorism'' just nine days after the 9/11 attacks.

''The reality is that the same moral principles that underpinned the Bush appeal on 'values' issues like gay marriage, stem-cell research and the right to life were central to his vision of U.S. war aims and foreign policy,'' according to Gaffney.

To be true to that commitment, policy in the second administration must be directed toward seven priorities, according to Gaffney, beginning with the ''reduction in detail of Fallujah and other safe havens utilised by freedom's enemies in Iraq''; followed by ''regime change -- one way or another -- in Iran and North Korea, the only hope for preventing these remaining 'Axis of Evil' states from fully realising their terrorist and nuclear ambitions.''

Third, the administration must provide ''the substantially increased resources needed to re-equip a transforming military and rebuild human-intelligence capabilities (minus, if at all possible, the sorts of intelligence 'reforms' contemplated pre-election that would make matters worse on this and other scores) while we fight World War IV, followed by enhancing ''protection of our homeland, including deploying effective missile defences at sea and in space, as well as ashore.”

Fifth, Washington must keep ''faith with Israel, whose destruction remains a priority for the same people who want to destroy us (and ... for our shared 'moral values) especially in the face of Yasser Arafat's demise and the inevitable, post-election pressure to 'solve' the Middle East problem by forcing the Israelis to abandon defensible boundaries.''

Sixth, the administration must deal with France and Germany and the dynamic that made them ''so problematic in the first term: namely, their willingness to make common cause with our enemies for profit and their desire to employ a united Europe and its new constitution -- as well as other international institutions and mechanisms -- to thwart the expansion and application of American power where deemed necessary by Washington.''

Finally, writes Gaffney, Bush must adapt ''appropriate strategies for contending with China's increasingly fascistic trade and military policies, (Russian President) Vladimir Putin's accelerating authoritarianism at home and aggressiveness toward the former Soviet republics, the worldwide spread of Islamofascism, and the emergence of a number of aggressively anti-American regimes in Latin America'', which he does not identify.

Gaffney is also a Pro-Israel spokesman in a rather independent fashion. Ideologically close to Israeli hardliners such as Likud party chief Yitzhak Shamir.
The CSP which he heads is a right-wing advocacy organization. His list just gives you hope for a brighter future doesn't it? America should just form a Nationalist Party. I know all Republicans don't agree with these policies.


Information Clearing House

NRO
 
The Morning After
11.07.04 (9:39 am)   [edit]
"Now the world will talk to the American people not only the Bush administration."

It looks like even if the United States electoral system was capable of expressing the people’s choice, the people would choose George W Bush.

That means that it is time to admit something. The greatest divide in the world today is not between the US elite and its people, or the US elite and the people of the world. It is between the US people and the rest of the world. The first time around, George W Bush was not elected. When the United States planted cluster bombs all over Afghanistan, disrupted the aid effort there, killed thousands of people, and occupied the country, it could be interpreted as the actions of a rogue group who had stolen the elections and used terrorism as a pretext to wage war. When the United States invaded Iraq, killing 100,000 at the latest count, it could be argued that no one had really asked the American people about it and that the American people had been lied to. When the United States kidnapped Haiti’s president and installed a paramilitary dictatorship, it could be argued that these were the actions of an unelected group with contempt for democracy.

With this election, all of those actions have been retroactively justified by the majority of the American people.

The first time around the Bush people acted without a mandate. Today, the only constituency that could have stopped them has given them a mandate to go beyond what they have done.

Two years ago, as the Afghan war was starting, before the Iraq war began, Pakistani American activist Zia Mian told an audience of Americans:

"People now will not tolerate the United States behaving like the British and the French conquering countries and creating new colonies. The people of the Third World did not fight for independence for 200 years against the British and the French and the Dutch and the Belgians and every other little European country that thought it had the military and economic power to push brown and black and yellow people around because they had something that they wanted. Well, that period of history is past! The Vietnamese should have taught everybody this. You do not go and take over somebody else’s country."

Continue reading at ZNet
 
Theocracy or Democracy?
11.07.04 (8:06 am)   [edit]
I took the following from an article entitled, 'Some Bush Supporters Say They Anticipate a 'Revolution.' What struck me most was Dr. James Dobson's words.

I have nothing against Dr. Dobson. He does a good work within the Christian community. But, this is where he needs to stay. What he is advocating is no different from radical Islamists. He would probably say his faith is the right one so his cause is good versus evil.

How dare we impose our faith on all people? I wonder how Mr. Dobson would feel if the Mormons or Jehovah Witnesses were to get a President elected and begin to control the government and run it according to their beliefs. I dare say he would be fighting tooth and nail to stop them. I imagine polygamy becoming law wouldn't please him and this would only be the beginning.

It's easy to be a moralist on issues that you believe in or make you feel good. But what happens when your rights are stepped on?

Some people can't see the forest for the trees and are setting a precedent for future disastor.

Dr. James C. Dobson, the founder of Focus on the Family and an influential evangelical Protestant, said he had issued a warning to a "White House operative" who called yesterday morning to thank him for his help.

Dr. Dobson said he told the caller that many Christians believed the country "on the verge of self-destruction" as it abandoned traditional family roles. He argued that "through prayer and the involvement of millions of evangelicals, and mainline Protestants and Catholics, God has given us a reprieve."

"But I believe it is a short reprieve," he continued, adding that conservatives now had four years to pass an amendment banning same-sex marriage, to stop abortion and embryonic stem-cell research, and most of all to remake the Supreme Court. "I believe that the Bush administration now needs to be more aggressive in pursuing those values, and if they don't do it I believe they will pay a price in four years," he said.

Dr. Dobson and several other Christian conservatives said they believed the expanded Republican majority in the Senate and the defeat of the Senate Democratic leader, Tom Daschle, put them in striking distance of both amending the constitution to ban same-sex marriage and approving the appointment of enough conservative Supreme Court justices to overturn Roe v. Wade and other abortion rights cases.

Austin Ruse, president of the conservative Catholic Culture of Life Foundation, suggested that if Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist steps down, Mr. Bush could begin to repay his social conservative backers by naming Justice Antonin Scalia to replace him. "We'd love to see Scalia in that spot, and I think we have earned it," Mr. Ruse said.

Information Clearing House
 
Star wars in the making
11.07.04 (6:16 am)   [edit]
It seems war and world domination are George Bush's priority and Tony Blair continues to follow along behind. What are we going to do? Are we going to sit back and let these two men continue to destroy the world as we know it? No doubt it's not in the best shape but there have to be better ways than war. Haven't we learned anything from the past?

America has begun preparing its next military objective -space. Documents reveal that the US Air Force has for the first time adopted a doctrine to establish 'space superiority'.

The new doctrine means that pre-emptive strikes against enemy satellites would become 'crucial steps in any military operation'. This week defence experts will attend a conference in London amid warnings that President Bush's re-election will pave the way to the arming of space.

Internal USAF documents reveal that seizing control of the 'final frontier' is deemed essential for modern warfare. Counterspace Operations reveals that destroying enemy satellites would improve the chance of victory. It states: 'Space superiority provides freedom to attack as well as freedom from attack. Space and air superiority are crucial first steps in any military operation.'

This week's meeting, held by the British-American Security Information Council (Basic), will also discuss whether Britain can restrain a US administration intent on strategic control of space.

Next year's budget for the US Missile Defence Agency includes funding for research into the development of 'space-based interceptors'. Although the funding allocated to develop lightweight ballistic missile parts is only £7.5m, further details have emerged of a more ambitious programme to site weapons in space

Plans for a 'thin constellation of three to six spacecraft' in orbit, which would target enemy missiles as they took off or landed, are planned.

Outer Space Treaty, which outlaws the use of weapons in orbit, will be ignored.

Of equal concern to some UK defence experts is Britain's agreement in principle to station US interceptor missiles at RAF Fylingdales, North Yorkshire. Participation in the missile defence programme means that Britain is already 'locked into' a programme that could ultimately include space warfare, say those who are monitoring developments.

Guardian
 
Dark days ahead as predicted
11.07.04 (5:52 am)   [edit]
Saudi Religious Scholars Support Holy War

The 26 Saudi scholars and preachers said in an open letter to the Iraqi people that their appeal was prompted by "the extraordinary situation through which the Iraqis are passing which calls for unity and exchange of views." The letter was posted on the Internet.

"At no time in history has a whole people been violated ... by propaganda that's been proved false," Sheik Awad al-Qarni, one of the scholars, told Al-Arabiya TV.

"The U.S. forces are still destroying towns on the heads of their people and killing women and children. What's going on in Iraq is a result of the big crime of America's occupation of Iraq."

The scholars were careful to direct their appeal to Iraqis only and stayed away from issuing a general, Muslim-wide call for holy war. They also identified the military as the target, one that is considered legitimate by many Arabs who view U.S. troops and their allies as occupiers.

The independent scholars — some of whom have been criticized in the past for their extremist views — apparently did not want to antagonize the Saudi government, a U.S. ally, or appear to be flouting its efforts to fight terrorism.

"Fighting the occupiers is a duty for all those who are able," the letter said. "It is a jihad to push back the assailants. Resistance is a legitimate right. A Muslim must not inflict harm on any resistance man or inform on them. Instead, they should be supported and protected."

The scholars said inter-Iraqi fighting would cause "great damage to the Iraqis and give a free service to the Jews who are infiltrating into Iraq and to the coalition forces which exploit differences to consolidate their domination."

Saudi Arabia, the birthplace of Islam and home to its two holiest cities, has launched a campaign against militants. The crackdown began after al-Qaida-affiliated operatives attacked three residential compounds in Riyadh in May 2003 and killed dozens of people, bringing terrorism to the kingdom for the first time since the Sept. 11 attacks.

AP
 
Zarqawi group calls for Hassan to be freed
11.06.04 (5:34 pm)   [edit]
There is fresh hope for the British woman being held hostage in Iraq.

A radical Islamist group linked to al Qaeda has posted a message on a website calling for those who kidnapped Margaret Hassan to set her free.

The organisation, which it is believed is headed by Abu Musab al Zarqawi, challenged her captors to publish any evidence against her.

Hassan, who works for the humanitarian organisation Care International, was recently seen on a video released by her captors pleading for Britain to withdraw its troops from Iraq.

The 59-year-old, who holds both British and Iraqi passports, was kidnapped on October 19th.

EuroNews
 
Too many voting irregularities to be coincidence
11.06.04 (2:30 pm)   [edit]
Right now there is no hard proof, but the circumstantial evidence is a mile high. Looking at all of these ’irregularities’ it’s hard to imagine how one could conclude that this election was clean.

Bellaciao

Black Box Voting has taken the position that fraud took place in the 2004 election through electronic voting machines. We base this on hard evidence, documents obtained in public records requests, inside information, and other data indicative of manipulation of electronic voting systems. What we do not know is the specific scope of the fraud. We are working now to compile the proof, based not on soft evidence -- red flags, exit polls -- but core documents obtained by Black Box Voting in the most massive Freedom of Information action in history.

Black Box Voting
 
OSCE recommends U.S. voting standards
11.06.04 (10:08 am)   [edit]
The OSCE Election Observation Mission recommends introduction of nationwide standards for U.S. voting procedures. The EOM took notice that the U.S. is going through a crucial phase of the election reform. For the first time, a federal law is providing nationwide regulation provisions. Unfortunately, the requirements of HAVA (Help America Vote Act) have not been fully implemented yet. Moreover, we believe the U.S. election reform will have to go beyond HAVA. In order to meet the OSCE commitments, U.S. election reform will have to provide nationwide registration rules as well as national standards for those who don't vote in person.

Several recommendations will be made and are pointed out in the article such as, a means for keeping track of the votes "would be desirable." I would say.

Washington Times
 
Families grief and anger
11.06.04 (9:27 am)   [edit]
Almost two hundred families, friends and well-wishers have flooded Black Watch's official website with messages expressing their grief and anger at the deaths in Iraq of three soldiers from the regiment.

Read some of them here.

How many more must die?
 
The sick man of the world’s democracies
11.06.04 (8:58 am)   [edit]
As was stated by the OSCE election observers, the US election system is worse than many in Third World countries and is totally unable to match the basic criteria for a 21st century democracy.

First, it is not a national election, nor an election in 50 states - it is an election organized in 13000 different ways, one for each district. Without one or just a few election laws, there is no way to ensure its fairness.

Fraud is already part of the game because of the obsolescence of a system dating from the early 19th century. For instance, due to local regulations, OSCE observers could not enter polling stations in one state … guess which one … Ohio!

Second, without a proper ID card system, securing the identification of voters is almost impossible. As one OSCE observer pointed out, the US should be using the ‘ink on the thumb’ system to prevent people voting twice.

Meanwhile, the lack of a credible identification system (people use drivers licenses or social security numbers - both of which are easily forged) generates a messy attempt of control through voters lists.

This paves the way for all sorts of litigation while not preventing multiple votes.

Third, the US voting system is unable to deliver anything but machines which cannot give any warranty on their reliability (electronic voting with no paper printing control system), nor on their accuracy.

Meanwhile, the belief that private companies can do a better job than a publicly-owned voting system casts a big shadow over the whole process - particularly when those companies have direct political connections with one candidate.

And fourth, the insufficient number of polling stations leading to a large number of US citizens who could not wait or would not wait for such a long time to be able to cast their vote.

The fact that there are huge queues obliging people to wait for hours before casting their vote is not a sign of a healthy democracy, but rather a sign that the democratic system is unable to match the demand of its citizens.

This puts this US election closer to the recent election in Afghanistan than to one in any developed world democracy.

A question then immediately comes to mind: who decided and how about the number of polling stations?

It is a way of denying access to the vote to several sections of the population.

Workers with low income, who cannot afford to miss a days work, are for instance part of such a group. Young voters are another one, who, unless they are highly politically motivated, are most likely going to turn away from a 3 hour waiting election line.

EU Observer
 
Bush reelection could push Norway towards EU
11.06.04 (8:49 am)   [edit]
This article is from March of this year and appropriate to point out now that Bush has won another 4 years.

US President George W. Bush's reelection could push Norway closer to EU membership as the country, which has long snubbed the bloc, now fears isolation between a unilateralist United States and a Europe steaming ahead without it.
Prime Minister Kjell Magne Bondevik, one of the leaders of the "No to the EU" campaign in a 1994 referendum in Norway, now says he can see the benefits of a Europe that speaks if not with one voice, then at least somewhat in concert.
"If the distance expands between the two sides of the Atlantic I think that many people in Europe, including myself, will see a need for a closer foreign policy and security cooperation" between European countries, he said after Bush's victory.
"This debate (about Norway joining the EU) could be introduced if the US continues to pursue a policy in which little importance is given to its alliance with Europe," he said.
After opposing the war in Iraq, albeit quietly, the Norwegian government no longer shies away from expressing its discord with the Bush administration on a number of subjects, such as the Kyoto Protocol on climate change, the International Criminal Court and the role of the United Nations.

More at EU Business

Also see TurkishPress
 
Spiraling into occupied Iraq
11.06.04 (8:06 am)   [edit]
My Image

Originally from Anchorage, Alaska, Dahr Jamail writes about the effects of the US occupation on the people of Iraq, since the mainstream media in the US has in large part, he believes, failed to do so.



The following is only a short excerpt from his latest piece.

Humvees and Bradley fighting vehicles are perched along the road, with their weapons aimed directly at us and other cars as we pass … this is occupied Iraq. We drive perilously close to a huge Bradley with its growling treads, and I point to it, thinking Abu Talat may not see how close he is. He laughs and says, "This is our daily life … you know this. How do you think Americans would like to have tanks on their streets aiming guns at them? For us, this is normal."

AntiWar.com
 
The strange practices of US military intelligence
11.06.04 (6:47 am)   [edit]
Jamal is a website designer. He lives with his sisters in south Manchester. He is 37, divorced, with three children. He said he assumed MI5 had followed him here to the hotel, but he's stopped worrying about it. He said that he keeps seeing the same man watching him from across the street, leaning against a car, and that whenever the man thinks he's been spotted, he looks briefly panicked and immediately bends down to fiddle casually with his tyre.

Jamal al-Harith is the Briton released from Guantanamo in the spring. He was kidnapped by the American military and imprisoned for 2 years. Take the time to read his story.

Guardian

 
Europe deserves - and might get - U.S. respect
11.06.04 (6:21 am)   [edit]
Tony Blair is fooling himself on this one. Mr. Schnabel words are clear and so are those of Mr. Bush. "If you're not with us, you're against us." Bush could care less about France. He has made this abundantly clear. US respect comes only at the point of a gun.
France is not with nor never has been with Mr. Bush on the issue of Iraq. This, I hope, will not change. We must continue to stand for the people of Iraq who have been and are being slaughtered for oil and Bush democracy.

British Prime Minister Tony Blair has assured his European peers that President George W. Bush wants to heal the bitter rift with Europe over Iraq.

Tony Blair you're a joke.

The U.S. ambassador to the EU, Rockwell Schnabel's reaction, in Brussels.

"If there is a change in attitude in France towards the Unites States, I would imagine we will respond in kind. France has been particularly difficult, of course. Germany is clearly already changing -- and we are doing a lot of things. Clearly, we have had a relationship with France (for) many, many years and we hope, obviously, that that is going to be mended. Business-to-business relationship with France is actually working quite well. There are some problems at the leadership... at the political level. And again there is a strong desire to get that straightened out as soon as possible. I am confident that it will (be), over time."

EuroNews

The expected Falluja onslaught also threatened to put transatlantic ties under further strain at a time when European leaders are taking stock of President Bush's re-election. Tony Blair has urged Europe to open up to Mr Bush, but the French president, Jacques Chirac, called instead for a broad front to counter US domination.

Mr Chirac also pointedly snubbed the visiting Iraqi prime minister at a Brussels EU summit, further polarising positions around the central issue of Iraq.

Mr Chirac chose to avoid an EU summit lunch with Mr Allawi, and brusquely rejected Mr Blair's calls for greater rapprochement with the re-elected US president.

"It is clear that Europe, now more than ever, has the need, the necessity, to strengthen its dynamism and unity when faced with this great world power," he said.

Guardian

 
Prayers and tears in Falluja
11.06.04 (5:55 am)   [edit]
My Image

I have to wonder if people in the US actually know what is happening in Iraq. If so, how can they allow this to go on? Is it possible for any to put themselves in the place of these people and feel compassion? How can you continue to condone the killing of thousands of innocent people and call yourself a 'Christian' nation led by God? These people have done nothing to the great USA. If you condone this action you are guilty of murder just as if you pulled the trigger yourself.



The Iraqi city of Falluja is braced for an assault by US forces massed on its outskirts.

When I hear bombs falling around my neighbourhood, I keep thinking - any moment now, I could be killed. It is worst during the night, when the bombardment is most intense. If a big bomb lands somewhere nearby, you often hear crying and wailing afterwards. It is a very strange feeling because in between the screaming, there is the sound of more missiles flying.

That is when I think - I could be next.

Another sound you hear during the bombing is that of prayers. People pray loudly because they are so scared. Sometimes, you hear people say quite unusual things - they improvise, making up their own prayers.

We followed the US elections very closely from Falluja. It was a matter of life and death. Many people were hoping John Kerry would win because they felt he would not have allowed our city to be attacked like this. Of course, we also know that the US policy in Iraq at large is not going to change. We do not forget that George Bush and John Kerry are two sides of the same coin. Still, as far as our city is concerned right now, a Kerry victory would have brought some hope.

I left my old house in the north of the city a month ago, when the Americans began bombing that area all the time. Now I live with a small group of friends near the centre of Falluja. US bombing raids cause fresh casualties every day
We are just men here. All our wives and children have left the city - some we sent to Baghdad, others to quieter areas closer by. We cook and eat together and spend most of our time in the house. If you want to leave the house, the safest time to do so is between seven in the morning and one in the afternoon, when the Americans take a break from the bombing.

The souk [market] in the centre of Falluja is open from morning to midday and, fortunately, it has not run out of food so far. But I can't see how long the supplies will last - two days ago, the government said it was cutting off the roads from Falluja to Baghdad and Ramadi. I don't know what we will eat then. I guess we might still be able to grab hold of some meat - I've seen a lot of goats in the city.

There is only one road out of the city that is still open now - but it runs through a checkpoint manned by US soldiers. We think they're going to cut this route off quite soon as well.

Food may soon run out because key roads to the city are closed
This used to be a city of 500,000 people. Now, my guess is there are about 100,000 still here. Some people who tried to leave earlier on found they had to come back because there was no way of surviving away from their homes.

Iraq is a difficult place to live at the moment. There are not many opportunities. The hospitals I have seen are full of people but empty of supplies and medicine. The erratic electricity also makes operating difficult. Ten to 18 new cases are brought in every day. The injured know they won't get much treatment. They come just to be near the doctor, to hear the doctor talk to them.

BBC

 
Red States Feed at Federal Trough, Blue States Supply the Feed
11.05.04 (6:20 pm)   [edit]
The Tax Foundation has released a fascinating report showing which states benefit from federal tax and spending policies, and which states foot the bill.

The report shows that of the 32 states (and the District of Columbia) that are "winners" -- receiving more in federal spending than they pay in federal taxes -- 76% are Red States that voted for George Bush in 2000. Indeed, 17 of the 20 (85%) states receiving the most federal spending per dollar of federal taxes paid are Red States. Here are the Top 10 states that feed at the federal trough (with Red States highlighted in bold):

Visit the site for map and more info.

TaxProf

 
Military Is Afraid to Tell Bush, Cheney the Truth
11.05.04 (4:55 pm)   [edit]
Seymour Hersh, the famed reporter known for breaking stories from My Lai to Abu Ghraib, said in a Washingtonpost.com chat today that "the major media have been part of the problem since 9-11, merely because they have far too often taken the president's public utterances at face value."

He added: "There also is a terrific unwillingness, perhaps understandable (though not by me), to make a moral judgment about a president's policies. There are plenty of people on the inside who are worried about the policies, especially among military guys, and I'm sure their views will increasingly become known."

Hersh, who has rarely sat for such chats, was asked about voters' lack of information on certain key issues, as revealed by non-partisan polls. "The most distressing issue, for me, in the election was the lack of information and the lack of interest in information about far too many of the electorate -- obviously, I'm referring to many of the religious factions who voted for Bush," he said. "The reality is that far too many Americans are not interested in the facts, or in reality." He added, however , that this just might be "a loser's lament." (He backed Kerry.)

Some of the other exchanges:

Asked how the Republicans can refer to the narrow Bush victory as a mandate, Hersh said, "You would be right in a rational world. Welcome to the Bush White House."

Will Bush now strive for unity? "In my view, he's got his mandate and he's going to carry on with his mantra -- bringing democracy to the Middle East…. Bush will consider many scary options [there]. What he can do, as opposed to what he wants to do, is the issue. Not much intelligence for some of his desires. ... I worry about the inability to the men running the U.S. government to accept information that challenges their assumptions and their belief. It's very frightening and the fact is that our senior military are very reluctant to give Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld any bad news. Sounds insane, doesn't it?"

On Iraq: "The military are scared of telling Cheney and Bush the truth and that will have to end within the next six months. They cannot deliver in Iraq what the president wants, and we'll have to start getting out. So I believe anyway."

Asked if the blue states should secede from the union, now dominated by the south, he said: "The other side tried that once and it didn't work."

Editor&Publisher

 
Outrage in Ohio
11.05.04 (9:22 am)   [edit]
Hundreds of angry Ohio residents marched through the streets of Columbus—Ohio’s Capital—this evening and stormed the Ohio State House, defying orders and arrest threats from Ohio State Troopers. "O-H-I-O ! suppressed democracy has got to go,"they chanted. After troopers pushed and scuffled with people, nearly a hundred people took over the steps and entrance to the State’s giant white column capital building and refused repeated orders to disperse or face arrest. People prepared for arrests, ready to face jail—writing lawyers phone numbers on their arms, signing jail support lists and discussing non-cooperation and active resistance (linking arms, but not fighting back).

A freshly painted banner held on the steps read "ONE VOTE DENIED = DEMOCRACY IN TROUBLE! 100’S OF 1000’S OF VOTES SURPRESSED = DEMOCRACY FAILED" articulated the crisis. An unprecedented massive grassroots voter registration and get out the vote effort and widespread opposition to Bush went up against the massive coordinated Republican effort to suppress, intimidate and possibly steal millions of votes. In addition to the voter suppression and intimidation is the fact that Bush campaign co-chair Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell is in charge of the election and vote counting. But much deeper questions about fundamental flaws in the system hang in the air.

CNN's exit poll showed Kerry beating Bush among Ohio women by 53 percent to 47 percent. Kerry also defeated Bush among Ohio's male voters 51 percent to 49 percent. Investigative reporter Greg Palast in an article today titled Kerry Won details how the deciding states, Ohio and New Mexico, if all votes were actually counted, would have gone to Kerry. Palast explains, "Although the exit polls show that most voters in Ohio punched cards for Kerry-Edwards, thousands of these votes were simply not recorded. The election in Ohio was not decided by the voters but by something called "spoilage." Typically in the United States, about 3 percent of the vote is voided, just thrown away, not recorded." But that is just a piece of it.

The Ohio state House takeover was the culmination of an eight-hour long afternoon of protest at the state capitol by Ohio student and youth groups (The Columbus and Toledo Leagues of Pissed Off Voters, and Reach Out-Bowling Green) together with Columbus residents followed by a 300 strong 6pm march led by the Central Ohio Peace Network. The earlier speak-out featured a litany of people who experienced or witnessed voter suppression, intimidation and disenfranchisement before and during the election. Thousand of Ohio voters had been disenfranchised by partisan poll challengers, intimidation incidents, polling places opening late, lines up to four and five hours long -- often in the rain.

More

 
Thomas Jefferson and freedom of religion
11.05.04 (8:36 am)   [edit]
Because religious belief, or non-belief, is such an important part of every person's life, freedom of religion affects every individual. Religious institutions that use government power in support of themselves and force their views on persons of other faiths, or of no faith, undermine all our civil rights. Moreover, state support of an established religion tends to make the clergy unresponsive to their own people, and leads to corruption within religion itself. Erecting the "wall of separation between church and state," therefore, is absolutely essential in a free society.

"One of the amendments to the Constitution... expressly declares that 'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press,' thereby guarding in the same sentence and under the same words, the freedom of religion, of speech, and of the press; insomuch that whatever violates either throws down the sanctuary which covers the others." --Thomas Jefferson: Draft Kentucky Resolutions, 1798. ME 17:382

"The rights [to religious freedom] are of the natural rights of mankind, and... if any act shall be... passed to repeal [an act granting those rights] or to narrow its operation, such act will be an infringement of natural right." --Thomas Jefferson: Statute for Religious Freedom, 1779. (*) ME 2:303, Papers 2:546

"From the dissensions among Sects themselves arise necessarily a right of choosing and necessity of deliberating to which we will conform. But if we choose for ourselves, we must allow others to choose also, and so reciprocally, this establishes religious liberty." --Thomas Jefferson: Notes on Religion, 1776. Papers 1:545

"I do not believe it is for the interest of religion to invite the civil magistrate to direct its exercises, its discipline, or its doctrines; nor of the religious societies, that the General Government should be invested with the power of effecting any uniformity of time or matter among them. Fasting and prayer are religious exercises. The enjoining them, an act of discipline. Every religious society has a right to determine for itself the times for these exercises and the objects proper for them according to their own particular tenets; and this right can never be safer than in their own hands where the Constitution has deposited it... Everyone must act according to the dictates of his own reason, and mine tells me that civil powers alone have been given to the President of the United States, and no authority to direct the religious exercises of his constituents." --Thomas Jefferson to Samuel Miller, 1808. ME 11:429

"To suffer the civil magistrate to intrude his powers into the field of opinion and to restrain the profession or propagation of principles on supposition of their ill tendency is a dangerous fallacy which at once destroys all religious liberty, because he being of course judge of that tendency will make his opinions the rule of judgment and approve or condemn the sentiments of others only as they shall square with or differ from his own." --Thomas Jefferson: Statute for Religious Freedom, 1779. ME 2:302, Papers 2: 546

"I do not know that it is a duty to disturb by missionaries the religion and peace of other countries, who may think themselves bound to extinguish by fire and fagot the heresies to which we give the name of conversions, and quote our own example for it. Were the Pope, or his holy allies, to send in mission to us some thousands of Jesuit priests to convert us to their orthodoxy, I suspect that we should deem and treat it as a national aggression on our peace and faith." --Thomas Jefferson to Michael Megear, 1823. ME 15:434

"Believing... that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their Legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church and State." --Thomas Jefferson to Danbury Baptists, 1802. ME 16:281

"I am really mortified to be told that, in the United States of America, a fact like this [i.e., the purchase of an apparent geological or astronomical work] can become a subject of inquiry, and of criminal inquiry too, as an offense against religion; that a question about the sale of a book can be carried before the civil magistrate. Is this then our freedom of religion? and are we to have a censor whose imprimatur shall say what books may be sold, and what we may buy? And who is thus to dogmatize religious opinions for our citizens? Whose foot is to be the measure to which ours are all to be cut or stretched? Is a priest to be our inquisitor, or shall a layman, simple as ourselves, set up his reason as the rule for what we are to read, and what we must believe? It is an insult to our citizens to question whether they are rational beings or not, and blasphemy against religion to suppose it cannot stand the test of truth and reason. If [this] book be false in its facts, disprove them; if false in its reasoning, refute it. But, for God's sake, let us freely hear both sides, if we choose." --Thomas Jefferson to N. G. Dufief, 1814. ME 14:127

"Our civil rights have no dependence upon our religious opinions more than our opinions in physics or geometry." --Thomas Jefferson: Statute for Religious Freedom, 1779. ME 2:301, Papers 2:545

Virginia.edu

 
Voting problems, lawsuits linger after election
11.05.04 (7:46 am)   [edit]
One North Carolina electronic voting machine is thought to have lost more than 4,500 votes, which could affect the result in several local races; election officials have said that the manufacturer, Unilect, told them that each machine could handle 10,500 votes, but the actual storage capacity was closer to 3000 votes. AP has More. Meanwhile, election-related lawsuits are still in play in several swing states. The ACLU is backing a suit by Florida voters who received their absentee ballots too late to vote; see the ACLU site for details. Tom Daschle filed suit in a South Dakota federal court alleging harassment of Native Americans at that state's polling places, winning an injunction on election day, and the Ohio Democratic Party has sued the Secretary of State, claiming that a dearth of voting machines caused lines so long that many voters left before casting their votes. Read the full complaint here[PDF].

Jurist

 
Dark Days Ahead
11.05.04 (7:35 am)   [edit]
by David Corn

Bush now has more power than he did before the election. He will use it. And he is likely to adopt the game plan that served him well at the start of his first term: Move fast and move hard.

Bush signaled his intentions before the election: partial privatization of Social Security, tax "reform" and tort "reform."

"Bush has already started laying out a vision of what he calls 'the ownership society.' It's a coherent worldview." It not only covers partial privatization of Social Security but the expansion of IRAs and health savings accounts. The point, says Norquist, is to wrap a Social Security initiative in a broader package with PR appeal. Norquist also envisions Bush pressing for a business-oriented tax cut before considering tax "reform." (Such a scheme will be billed as simplification, but it could also rejigger the tax code in favor of Bush's preferred beneficiaries: the rich.)

Bush can be expected to continue his undeclared war on environmental safeguards, to propose expanding the Patriot Act and to maintain his effective ban on stem-cell research.

He will further pursue policies that feed the gargantuan deficits and will deny the overwhelming fiscal fiasco. Before the election, his Administration was preparing for severe cuts in social programs.

"On foreign policy, the big question mark," says Norquist, "is, What has the President and the Republican Party learned from Iraq?

Bush has committed himself to "staying the course" (whatever it is) in Iraq and also to remaking the Middle East. He has fully embraced the hubris and arrogance of the neocons. Why should Bush change his fundamental national security views when he has escaped punishment for hyping a threat, misleading the country into an unnecessary war and alienating much of the globe?

The Bush camp has been rewarded for its tactics of distortion and derision. Bush and Dick Cheney appealed to people's fears. And the lesson for them and the Republicans is clear: This worked, let's do more.

More

|
 
J'accuse: War Crimes & Iraq
11.05.04 (7:22 am)   [edit]
“…The Parties to the conflict shall at all times distinguish between the civilian population and combatants and between civilian objects and military objectives and accordingly shall direct their operations only against military objectives…”
Article 48, 1977 addition to the Geneva Conventions, Part IV

Consider the following:

On Oct. 8, U.S. fighter bombers carried out what the Pentagon called a “precision strike” against “terrorist leaders” in Falluja, a sprawling city of 300,000 west of Baghdad. For the past two months Falluja has been the target of a bombing campaign. According to the New York Times, the attack wounded 17 people, nine of whom were women and children. The victims were apparently from a wedding party that had just dispersed.

The Times went on to quote a “senior Pentagon official” who said, “We know what the strike was supposed to hit and we hit it. If a wedding party was going on, well, it was in concert with a meeting of a top Zarqawi lieutenant.” Zarqawi is a Jordanian who has claimed credit for numerous roadside bombings and assassinations in Iraq.

But according to Article 50 of the Conventions, “The presence within the civilian population of individuals who do not come within the definition of civilians does not deprive the population of its civilian character.”

In short, the attack violated the Conventions, and the “Pentagon official”—most likely Assistant Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz—should be arrested and tried for violating international law. Since the attack constituted a “grave breach” of the Conventions, the official could also be charged under the 1996 U.S. War Crimes Act.

In the same article, the Times also quoted a “senior Bush administration official” as saying that the bombing was helpful for exploiting “fault lines” in Falluja, and that it would push the “citizenry” of Falluja to deny sanctuary and assistance to the insurgents, adding “that’s a good thing.”

The “official” might, indeed, think it was “a good thing,” but it also violated Article 51, which states: “The civilian population as such, as well as individual civilians, shall not be the object of attack.”

A “Pentagon official” also told the Times: “If there are civilians dying in connection with these attacks, and with the destruction, the locals at some point have to make a decision. Do they want to harbor the insurgents and suffer the consequences that come with that?”

In other words, terrify the civilian population into cooperating, a strategy that Article 51 explicitly forbids: “Acts or threats of violence, the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population, are prohibited.”

The Geneva Conventions and other international laws were not drawn up by bleeding heart liberals, nor were they designed to protect weaker nations. They were a response to the enormous numbers of civilian casualties inflicted by World War II, and as a practical way to shield everyone’s armed forces from humiliation, torture and death at the hands of an adversary.

If we are cavalier or dismissive about international law, it will encourage others to be so as well. The most likely victims of that policy will be we civilians, as well as our own uniformed forces. If we torture prisoners and hide them from the eyes of organizations like the Red Cross, why shouldn’t others do the same to our soldiers and civilians?

In a recent commentary in the Financial Times, Jakob Kellenberger, president of the International Committee of the Red Cross, wrote: “The struggle against terrorism cannot be legitimate if it undermines basic values shared by humanity. The right to life and protection against murder, torture and degrading treatment must be at the heart of the actions of those engaged in this struggle. The struggle will lose credibility if it is used to justify acts otherwise considered unacceptable, such as the killing of people not participating in hostilities.”

More

|
 
Life without Arafat
11.05.04 (7:12 am)   [edit]
by Ramzy Baroud

For some Arafat is just another autocratic Arab ruler clinging to his position, refusing to share power or allocate responsibility to anyone but his cronies and with nothing new to offer save the worn out rhetoric about a "light at the end of the tunnel" and the "mountain (that) cannot be shaken by the wind". But those who see only this side of Arafat ignore the heady political, cultural and intellectual mix represented in his person, his ability to mean many different things to many different people.

Arafat -- whether deliberately or not -- managed to associate himself with every hardship faced by Palestinians over the decades. From his early years as a student activist in Cairo, in 1949, to the momentous formation of the Fatah movement in 1965, Arafat was always present.

For Arab leaders, despite his fall-outs with some on occasion, Arafat was a godsend. His presence justified their absence. It was Arafat who insisted on referring to the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) as the "legitimate and only" representative of the Palestinian people and Arab regimes passionately embraced the slogan. It was an exoneration of their utter failure to defend the cause of Palestine and its people.

Palestinians, of course -- even those who oppose his political line and unconditional peace offerings -- see Arafat in a different light. When a military helicopter hauled him out of his headquarters in Ramallah, ending a three-year-long Israeli siege, Palestinians silently observed Arafat's most recent departure and connected it to the history of dispossession of which they have all been part. Palestinian commentators wrote about distant, yet unforgotten, history, relating Amman to Beirut to Tunis to Gaza to Ramallah and now to Paris.

Arafat's legacy is one of undiluted symbolism -- a symbolism at once substantial and meaningful. Even if he acted as though his journey to France was like any other Palestinians knew that this journey was different.

More

|
 
Is Ohio Stupid?
11.05.04 (6:32 am)   [edit]
One of the many frustrated Democrats trudging out the door of Faneuil Hall after John Kerry's concession speech on Wednesday made an observation that's worth passing along. He said that more people in Ohio lost their jobs over the last four years than switched their votes.

He's actually right. The state shed 237,000 jobs during George W. Bush's first term, yet Kerry came only 30,252 votes closer to winning Ohio than Al Gore did in 2000. So the obvious question of the moment is as follows: Is Ohio stupid?

I truly don't get how we reelected a sitting president who inherited a record budget surplus and turned it into a record deficit. I don't get how we reelected a president who waged a war against a nation that never attacked us on pretenses that ended up being indisputably wrong.

I don't get how we reelected a president who has Dick Cheney as his vice president. I don't get how we reelected a president who turned a reservoir of international good will weeks after Sept. 11 into a deep pit of anti-American hatred. I don't get how we reelected a president who lost the nation jobs and whose answer to every problem is bigger tax cuts for the wealthiest citizens.

Sour grapes? An elitist liberal view? Maybe, but I don't think so, and here's why: I voted for the guy four years ago. As recently as January 2002, I was proud to have him as my president. But right now I live in fear of what he's done these past two years and where he's about to go.

I don't blame John Kerry for this. He can't help his own political limitations. He began this race an aloof Massachusetts liberal, and he ended it largely the same way, maybe because that's what he actually is. Still, he outworked Bush, outdebated him, and over the course of the campaign, outsmarted him. His problems, though, were structural more than strategic.

John Edwards liked talking about two Americas and, unintentionally, he got it precisely right. The two Americas now are the God-fearing Southern and inland states -- that great mass of red that extends from the Carolinas all the way to Arizona, Nevada, and Idaho, places awash in land, religion, and moral values -- and the blue states, like us, mostly crowded, colorful, and unkempt, always pushing from odd angles, places where faith is mostly a private thing.

So back to the initial question: Is Ohio stupid? No, not really. It's just different, and states like that don't understand us any more than we understand them. What Bush did so well was play and prey on that schism, driving evangelical Christians to the polls more out of fear than hope, fear, especially, of the huns along the two coasts trying to spread their immoral ways. It's a key lesson in why good politics isn't necessarily good leadership.

More

|
 
Your Rich Men Are Full of Violence
11.04.04 (7:14 pm)   [edit]
By Robert Jensen

After hearing both John Kerry and George W. Bush end their concession and victory speeches with the ubiquitous "God bless America," I decided to conclude all my future political talks with the call "God condemn America," and quote the Bible in support.

Many in the anti-war and anti-empire movement tend toward the pacifist language of the gospels when they invoke religion, but I've always been a fan of the so-called "minor prophets" of the Old Testament, such as Micah. Probably the best-known verse from Micah is: "And what does the Lord require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?".

It's a beautiful passage, a reminder -- even for non-believers -- that a decent path through life can be expressed simply: justice, kindness, humility.

But Micah doesn't stop at articulating the ideal; he speaks of the failure of those in power to live up to the ideal. He names the wickedness in the land: "Your rich men are full of violence; your inhabitants speak lies, and their tongue is deceitful in their mouth". Micah's language is harsh: "The godly man has perished from the earth, and there is none upright among men; they all lie in wait for blood, and each hunts his brother with a net".

Despite the professions of Christian faith from Bush and his gang, that all sounds a lot like this administration: willing to use violence -- and obscene levels of violence, including violence against innocents -- to extend and deepen U.S. power, and willing to lie to manipulate public opinion to build support for illegal wars.

I like reading the prophets, not just for their passion but as a reminder that there are many moments in history when leaders -- whether they are the kings of ancient Israel or the presidents of the United States -- will have amassed such concentrated power that no challenge in the short term is possible. There are moments when those leaders will have bought off or deceived the majority of people so that they rule with popular support. Bush won a second term with a 3 1/2 million-vote margin. Many of the people who voted for him believe, or want to believe, that the United States is God's instrument on this earth.

They should read Micah more closely. Perhaps we can turn back from our assault on the rest of the world, and our disregard for the cascading ecological collapse, before it's too late, before "the earth will be desolate because of its inhabitants, for the fruit of their doings". One day, perhaps, we will reach the point Micah promises: "The nations shall see and be ashamed of their might".

To reach that, Micah reminds us of the need for commitment over the long haul: "Rejoice not over me, O my enemy; when I fall, I shall rise; when I sit in darkness, the Lord will be a light to me".

We sit in darkness; there is no point in pretending otherwise. The imperial project of the United States is rotted to the core, a fact neither candidate nor party seems able or willing to acknowledge. Bush's election is disturbing mostly because it reveals just how many fellow citizens share in that wicked project.

So, God condemn America, please, so that the world might live.

CounterPunch

|
 
Uri Avnery: Arafat
11.04.04 (11:37 am)   [edit]
I don’t know how serious his medical condition really is. I only hope that he will recover fully. And I know that if, God forbid, he should pass away, Israelis will learn to appreciate him in his absence.

The Importance of being Irrelevant

|
 
Palestinians have no reason to trust the US
11.04.04 (11:12 am)   [edit]
Many Palestinians have reacted angrily to news of US President George Bush's re-election.

Despite his declared vision for a viable Palestinian state thriving in peace beside Israel, most Palestinians believe Bush to be an enemy of Arabs and Muslims and a fanatic ally of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.

"We are bracing ourselves for four more years of Israeli repression, murder and terror. I believe that Bush's embrace of Israeli expansionism will now be unmasked and brasher and blunter than ever before," Abd al-Sattar Qassim, political science professor at Najah National University in Nablus, told Aljazeera.net.

"Our problem is not with Bush or Kerry; it is with the established and inherently-hostile American policy which is based on supporting Israel, right or wrong. Hence, I believe that the Palestinian people, along with Arabs and Muslims in this part of the world, should stop looking to America for justice and peace.

"If we count on the US to restore our rights, then we will have to wait for eternity."

More

|
 
Thinking of moving abroad?
11.04.04 (6:43 am)   [edit]
If you want to leave America because you want to have an adventure, great! Go for it, but if you want to leave America because you are frustrated with politics, I implore you to please reconsider. America needs you. America needed me this year, and I wasn't there. I know that me alone would not have been able to change the outcome of this election, but I do know that there were many, many days that I was angered by events but was powerless to do anything about it. I wanted more than anything this year to be knocking on doors, registering people to vote, and getting the message of my candidates out. I want to live in an America where people have a conscience again, and my conscience is telling me that I need to do more.

Read more about Flora's experience

So the wrong candidate has won, and you want to leave the country. Let us consider the options.

Electing to Leave

|
 
Children survive on watermelon seeds
11.04.04 (6:30 am)   [edit]
Moumina, a 40-year-old mother of seven children, is thankful that it’s Ramadan - the Muslim month of prayer and fasting. It means she has fewer meals to scrounge up for her children. During Ramadan, adults go without food and water from sunrise to sunset. Children do not fast, but this year Moumina’s youngsters have no choice.

For dinner, Moumina serves the children food she never would have imagined eating: dried watermelon seeds crushed into a paste. The family’s goats normally eat better than this. The pitiful meal provides little nutrition but it will take the edge off the children’s hunger until morning. Moumina dreads sunrise when they will ask what’s for breakfast, their faces filled with innocent hope. She will make a thin, tasteless pancake from borrowed flour—their only meal for the day.

Moumina, her husband Moktar, and their family live in Dar el Avia, a village on the edge of the Sahara desert in southern Mauritania. In September, locust swarms destroyed most of the crops in the area and across Mauritania. The couple watched in helpless horror as clouds of insects descended on their fields of sorghum, cowpeas, and watermelons.

It’s the worst locust invasion in the last 15 years. An estimated 80 per cent of Mauritanians depend on agriculture and livestock for their living. Experts are predicting severe food shortages across Mauritania and in neighboring locust-infested countries including Mali, Senegal, Niger, and Chad where World Vision supports 140,000 sponsored children.

It’s estimated that the country will need 10,000 to 30,000 metric tons of food to avert famine conditions.”

For Moumina, the crisis is already on her doorstep. “I can’t sleep at night. My brain keeps turning, turning with worry. I ask myself, ‘How are we going to get food’?” says Moumina, a frail, pretty woman. “The children cry at night because they don’t have enough to eat. I’m afraid that they’ll get diseases and we won’t have any money for medicine.”

Moktar says now everyone in his village is in the same needy situation. “Some families have fewer children than we do so they share what they can with us.” Moktar has run up a bill at the village store that he can’t pay. He’s dependant on his neighbors’ charity but it can’t last much longer because soon their food will also be gone.

Parents like Moktar and Moumina have placed their children’s future in God’s care and in the generosity of strangers. It’s their only hope. The locusts may have devoured their fields, but the insects could not destroy the couple’s faith.

“When I pray, I pray that there will be peace in the world, that I will have the opportunity to work, and that my family will have enough food,” says Moktar. “I pray also for people I don’t even know us who are willing to help my children. May God give them a long and prosperous life.”

AlertNet

|
 
Hunters kill last brown bear
11.04.04 (6:11 am)   [edit]
Hunters have shot dead the last female brown bear native to the Pyrenees, condemning the species to extinction and causing an "environmental catastrophe" for France, the government said.
Animal protection groups were last night concerned for the survival of the bear's 10-month-old orphaned cub which escaped unharmed, but which was barely weaned.

His mother, affectionately known by game wardens as Cannelle (Cinnamon), was killed on Monday when a group of boar-hunters shot her in what they claim was self-defence.

It may have been self defence but they weren't allowed to hunt in that area to begin with. This is sickening. They should jail the hunters but of course they won't. The headline should have read..Hunter killed by last brown bear, in self defence of course...

Guardian

AP

|
 
Canada: U.S. Immigrants Must Seek Visas
11.04.04 (6:02 am)   [edit]
TORONTO - Americans attempting to escape four more years of President Bush by fleeing to Canada will have to wait in line, just like immigrants from any other country, the Immigration Ministry said Wednesday.

This sounds like something out of a science fiction movie. But, I see the compassionate, nationalist Conservatives around the net are already telling the distressed Americans to get the hell out.

AP

|
 
It Can't Happen Here by Sinclair Lewis
11.04.04 (5:48 am)   [edit]
Published in 1935 It Can't Happen Here is a a cautionary tale about the rise of fascism in the United States. During the presidential election of 1936, Doremus Jessup, a newspaper editor, observes with dismay that many of the people he knows support the candidacy of a fascist, Berzelius Windrip. When Windrip wins the election, he forcibly gains control of Congress and the Supreme Court, and, with the aid of his personal paramilitary storm troopers, turns the United States into a totalitarian state. It serves as a warning that political movements akin to Nazism can come to power in countries such as the United States when people blindly support their leaders. Lewis, who won the Nobel and Pulitzer Prizes, was also the author of Elmer Gantry, a novel about an greedy, shallow, philandering fundamentalist minister, and Babbit, a biting look at middle class values.

The full text of the now out of print book is online at the following link.

eBooks

|
 
Let us content ourselves with this
11.03.04 (6:54 pm)   [edit]
The country voted for these guys with its eyes open. Let us hear no complaining about "bait and switch," and a "uniter, not a divider," and on and on and on. It even returned a national legislature consonant with the incumbent's agenda. There will be permanent tax cuts that will institutionalize a national debt that will force some sort of evisceration of Social Security and Medicare. There will be continued military adventurism in the Middle East. There will be Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz and Chief Justice Antonin Scalia. There will be more lying and more vengeance.

So let there be no whining when your husband's National Guard obligation leaves him under fire for six extra months, or when Granny and Gramps are eating cat food, or when it become increasingly impossible to meet the economic needs of the middle-class family.

No complaining. None of it.

You wanted this guy. Now you have him, unleashed.

Charles Pierce

More

|
 
Let's face it
11.03.04 (6:41 pm)   [edit]
Eric Alterman

The problem is just this: Slightly more than half of the citizens of this country simply do not care about what those of us in the “reality-based community” say or believe about anything.

They don’t care that Iraq is turning into murderous quicksand and a killing field for our children. They don’t care that the Bush presidency has made us less safe by creating more terrorists, inspiring more anti-American hatred and refusing to engage in the hard work that would be necessary to make a meaningful dent in our myriad vulnerabilities at home. They don’t care that he has mortgaged our children’s future to give trillions to the wealthiest among us. They don’t care that the economy continues to hemorrhage well-paying jobs and replace them with Wal-Mart; that the number without health insurance is over forty million and rising. They don’t care that Medicare premiums are rising to fund the coffers of pharmaceutical companies. They don’t care that the air they breathe and the water they drink is being slowly poisoned and though they call themselves conservatives, they even don’t care that the size of the government and its share of our national income has increased by roughly a quarter in just four years. This is not a world of rational debate and issue preference.

More

|
 
The World Names The Dead on Election Day
11.03.04 (2:52 pm)   [edit]
As USA citizens went to the polls today, people from all walks of life in all parts of the world took part in simultaneous ceremonies to read out the names of some of those that have lost their lives in the USA-led invasion and occupation of Iraq.

In London, a twelve year old British girl, reading out the names of Iraqi children all aged 12, was joined by politicians, celebrities, members of the Iraqi and Muslim community, members of anti-war groups, and members of the general public, to read out the names of 5,000 victims of the invasion and occupation. Most of the victims named were Iraqis, but the names of non-Iraqis, including Americans and journalists, were also read out.

London’s mayor Ken Livingstone, Jeremy Corbyn MP, and playwright Harold Pinter took part in the ceremony. There were few speeches. It was a solemn occasion, where people from all walks of life stood united in solidarity to hear the names.

The Stop the War Coalition, which organised the ceremonies, said that November 2nd was an appropriate moment to commemorate the many thousands of Iraqis who will never live to see a peaceful end to the illegal war against their country, but stressed that the event was also in remembrance of those non-Iraqis who have died as a result of the war.

“We will commemorate the soldiers, aid workers and others of all nationalities who have died. They are also the victims of the policies of George Bush and Tony Blair,” said a statement from the group before the event.

In a poignant statement, a representative of September Eleventh Families For Peaceful Tomorrows reminded people that although people go to the polls no more than once a year, in a democracy “every day is election day. Through our individual choices, our individual actions, and our individual sense of commitment, we collectively drive our nation into the future.”

“Recognizing that we are ultimately responsible for the actions of our country,” said the representative, “the members of Peaceful Tomorrows will continue to promote U.S. foreign policy that places a priority on internationally-recognize d principles of human rights, democracy, and self-rule.”

Chris Burns-Cox, an activist with Voices in the Wilderness who visited Iraq with the group in 2001, carried a placard with a picture of twelve year-old Zina Akram Hammodi, who was killed by a missile from invading forces in Basrah in April 2003. “The sanctions were cruel,” said Mr Burns-Cox, “immoral and totally stupid. Once you see what we have contributed to the disaster in Iraq you can’t walk away.”

Hani Lazim, from Iraq, read the name of one of his relatives. He recalled how even those burying the dead in Najaf were not spared. An Apache helicopter fired on his fellow Iraqis as they were digging graves for those already dead.

Human rights lawyer, Louise Kristian, said that war crimes had been committed, and that those responsible ought to face justice in the International Criminal Court. She read the name of Alla Hassan, a man of unknown age, killed in an unknown way. There are many Alla Hassan’s in Iraq.

The ceremony in London was one of over thirty held in towns and cities across England. Many others across the world were held today, in cities as far afield as Adelaide and Naples, Baghdad and Zurich, Barcelona and Inverness.

WorldCrisis

|
 
International election observers not impressed
11.03.04 (12:47 pm)   [edit]
The global implications of the U.S. election are undeniable, but international monitors at a polling station in southern Florida said Tuesday that voting procedures being used in the extremely close contest fell short in many ways of the best global practices.

The observers said they had less access to polls than in Kazakhstan, that the electronic voting had fewer fail-safes than in Venezuela, that the ballots were not so simple as in the Republic of Georgia and that no other country had such a complex national election system.

"To be honest, monitoring elections in Serbia a few months ago was much simpler," said Konrad Olszewski, an election observer stationed in Miami by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.

Democrat viewpoint

"The United States has long been a model for the world, if we allow international observers we will continue to have a leading role," said Richard Williams.

Republican viewpoint

"Get on the next plane out of the United States to go monitor an election somewhere else, like Afghanistan," said Jeff Miller.

Yes, well, I guess that says it all...

More

|
 
Ice-free Artic
11.03.04 (10:05 am)   [edit]
Global warming is causing the Arctic ice-cap to melt at such an unprecedented rate that by the summer of 2070 it may have no ice at all, according to the most comprehensive study carried out on global climate change in the region.
The icecap has shrunk by 15% to 20% in the past 30 years and the trend is set to accelerate, with the Arctic warming almost twice as fast as the rest of the planet, due to a build-up of heat-trapping gases.

The report found that the changes are likely to harm native communities, wildlife and economic activity, but also highlighted some controversial short-term advantages: oil and gas deposits will be easier to reach, more farming may be possible and shortcut trans-Arctic shipping lanes may open, shortening the sea journey between the UK and Japan by up to 12 days.

"The big melt has begun," Jennifer Morgan, director of the WWF's global climate change campaign, said in a statement. "Life on Earth will change beyond recognition with the loss of the ice sheet at the north pole and higher sea levels threatening major global cities such as London."

George Bush pulled out of the UN's Kyoto protocol on global warming in 2001, arguing it was too expensive.

More

|
 
Cost Of 2004 US Elections At $4 Billion And Counting
11.03.04 (8:31 am)   [edit]
The price of democracy in 2004: $4 billion, and that's not even counting all the ballots, poll workers and election lawyers.

Add the expenses borne by states and local government -to be determined later -and the price tag rises anywhere from hundreds of millions of dollars to possibly upward of $1 billion more.

In the business world, $5 billion would be enough to buy out Donald Trump -twice. It would pay for about 2,200 Super Bowl commercials, or educate about 30,000 students at Yale, the alma mater of President Bush and Sen. John Kerry.

Where did all the money go?

Congressional and presidential candidates alone devoted at least $1.8 billion to their primary and general election campaigns, with about one-third of that spent by Bush and Kerry.

Ad firms consumed much of the money, but other small businesses got a piece of the action, too. Former Democratic presidential hopeful Howard Dean, for example, spent nearly $7,000 on "thank you" chocolates for donors, bought from home state truffle maker Lake Champlain Chocolates.

The Democratic and Republican parties and the host committees helping them spent about $162 million on their nominating convention, including about $29 million in taxpayer money.

In all, the two parties spent at least $957 million this election cycle. Bush and Kerry also have millions to draw on in case of a presidential recount -some $78 million between the two politicians.

Much of the money poured into partisan politics this election cycle came from outside groups. Organizations collecting the unlimited donations the national parties are now barred from raising spent at least $436 million in 2003 and '04, figures compiled by the Political Money Line campaign finance tracking service show.

In addition, the AFL-CIO and its two largest unions planned to spend $150 million urging members to vote.

Taxpayers are throwing in hundreds of millions of dollars more.

The National Association of Secretaries of State estimates the elections will cost an average of $33 million per state. The costliest: California, at roughly $66 million. The least expensive is Wyoming, about $500,000.

The Justice Department is sending out more than 1,000 election observers and poll monitors, and will figure out the cost later.

With thousands of different agencies involved from the local to the federal level, it would be a massive undertaking to obtain solid spending figures from everyone, Government Accountability Office noted.

The estimated $4 billion that candidates, party committees and interest groups devoted to the congressional and presidential races is about $1 billion more than in the 1999-2000 cycle, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan campaign finance watchdog group.

It's a lot of money -but still a bargain compared with what it could cost to match the net worth of the nation's wealthiest person, Bill Gates.

The Microsoft founder could cover campaigning and voting costs for about eight elections like this one -without going broke.

I dare say you could feed a few hungry people with this amount. Maybe even save a life or two...

DowJones

|
 
Lawyers fighting for Hicks rights
11.03.04 (8:23 am)   [edit]
29-year-old Australian, David Hicks, has pleaded innocent to attempted murder, aiding the enemy and conspiracy to attack civilians, commit terrorism and destroy property. Conviction could bring a life sentence.

The former cowboy is accused of joining Afghanistan's Taliban militia and developing ties to al-Qaida terror network. He allegedly took up arms against U.S. and coalition forces, but not civilians.

The defense and prosecution debated whether terrorism applied to Hicks' alleged association with al-Qaida.

"Terrorism is an offense under international law and has been prior to events before September 2001," prosecutor Marine Lt. Col. Kurt Brubaker said.

The defense argued the Sept. 11 attacks did not constitute "armed conflict."

Lawyers also attacked the contention that U.S. laws do not apply to foreigners from more than 40 countries held at its base in Cuba.

"Only the U.S. government asserts that there are lawless places in the world," defense lawyer Josh Dratel said, noting the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in June that prisoners can challenge their detentions in U.S. courts.

The defense argued that al-Qaida is not a state, and war crimes generally require two states in conflict.

The defense also argued Hicks, held for nearly three years, has a right to a speedy trial. Prosecutors noted a review tribunal had found Hicks an "enemy combatant," and as such has no right to a speedy trial.

The hearings came amid U.S. elections that could change the mission that has detained some 550 terror suspects. Only four prisoners have been charged.

If challenger Sen. John Kerry wins, running mate John Edwards said he could abandon commissions and set up traditional military courts-martial.

We now know this isn't going to happen and I imagine those like David Hicks have even more to fear now with Bush given the right to continue business as usual.

Interesting that the US calls forth 'international law' when it suits them.

AP

|
 
Torture and accountability in the 'war on terror'
11.03.04 (7:56 am)   [edit]
Then [the guard] brought a box of food and he made me stand on it, and he started punishing me. Then a tall black soldier came and put electrical wires on my fingers and toes and on my penis, and I had a bag over my head. Then he was saying ‘which switch is on for electricity?’ Iraqi detainee, Abu Ghraib prison, 16 January 2004(1)

The United States is more concerned with getting around international laws which prohibit torture than with safeguarding human rights as it wages its "war on terror", Amnesty International said in a report.

The report, a 200-page analysis of the practices and decisions that led to torture in Iraq, and alleged abuse in Afghanistan and at Guantanamo Bay, argues that Washington's "war mentality" led it down a slippery slope toward disregard for the rule of law.

"It is tragic that in the 'war on terror', the USA has itself undermined the rule of law. Its selective disregard for the Geneva Conventions and international human rights law has contributed to torture and ill-treatment," it wrote.

Amnesty

|
 
Four more years of blogging Bush catastrophe
11.03.04 (7:37 am)   [edit]
I just woke up. Resisted for awhile getting up to look at election results. Anyone that has read my few personal postings over the months knows I expected Bush to win. I have had twinges of hope the past few weeks but nothing overwhelming.
I wasn't surprised to see my homestate of Louisiana vote Bush. There are plenty of Democrats there but you can't beat the church vote and Bush has that wrapped up. These are the people that are worried about abortion but don't give a damn about living children starving to death, dying of aids and other diseases or being blown up by American bombs. The mind boggles.
I have faith US nationalism will win the day. There will be no ray of sunshine or hope for the world coming from Americans today. It will be business as usual. War as usual. Terrorism as usual or more. World poverty as usual etc. etc. etc.

|
 
World Riveted by U.S. Election
11.02.04 (4:10 pm)   [edit]
To an extraordinary degree, politicians, media and ordinary people across the globe are riveted by Tuesday's U.S. presidential election, drawn into the dead-heat contest between President Bush and John Kerry by a deep-rooted feeling that the world has a huge stake in the outcome.

Bush's go-it-alone stance on many issues — from the Kyoto Treaty to the war in Iraq — as well as his religious outlook, his Texas background and single-minded approach, have mobilized and polarized people all over the world, even if they can't vote.

Polls in many countries — and a quick survey of the newspapers and TV — leave little doubt that Kerry is the preferred choice across much of the globe. Polls in Germany run as high as 80 percent against Bush.

At the heart of the matter is a belief that in an era of globalization, when American decisions affect hundreds of millions around the globe, the election is not a domestic U.S. issue.

"George Bush or John Kerry? The result will affect us all," ran a teaser on the Dubai-based Arab satellite network Al-Arabiya.

It's regrettable that the elections "will decide the fate of people who cannot vote in it," Joseph Samaha, editor-in-chief of the leftist daily As-Safir, wrote in a Tuesday column.

"Why shouldn't the Italians vote for the elections, too?" said screenwriter Michele Cogo in Rome. "The planet's destiny is decided in large part by America."

On election eve, Monday, Michael Moore's anti-Bush film "Fahrenheit 9/11" competed on prime time German television with "Wag the Dog," about a U.S. president who starts a war to distract from his domestic troubles, and with 24-hour news channel reports on the candidate's final day of campaigning.

Jordanian pharmacist Salma Eissa said she was rooting for Kerry because the Democrats "don't use war to solve the world's problems."

"We saw Bush and we weren't happy with him," she said. "There is no one who likes the war in Iraq. There are other ways to deal with terrorism."

In Sao Paulo, Brazilian cabdriver Wagner Markues, 54, said he too preferred Kerry and wondered why the race was so close.

"We don't understand America now," he said. "Are they getting different news than us about the scandals in the Iraqi prisons and the children and civilians who are getting killed?"

AP

|
 
If you're skin isn't white will your vote count?
11.02.04 (2:14 pm)   [edit]
Through a combination of sophisticated vote rustling—ethnic cleansing of voter rolls, absentee ballots gone AWOL, machines that "spoil" votes—John Kerry begins with a nationwide deficit that could easily exceed one million votes.

Colorado Secretary of State Donetta Davidson just weeks ago removed several thousand voters from the state's voter rolls. She tagged felons as barred from voting. What makes this particularly noteworthy is that, unlike like Florida and a handful of other Deep South states, Colorado does not bar ex-cons from voting. Only those actually serving their sentence lose their rights.

There's no known, verified case of a Colorado convict voting illegally from the big house. Because previous purges have wiped away the rights of innocents, federal law now bars purges within 90 days of a presidential election to allow a voter to challenge their loss of civil rights.

To exempt her action from the federal rule, Secretary Davidson declared an "emergency." However, the only "emergency" in Colorado seems to be President Bush's running dead, even with John Kerry in the polls.

Why the sudden urge to purge? Davidson's chief of voting law enforcement is Drew Durham, who previously worked for the attorney general of Texas. This is what the former spokeswoman for the Lone Star state's attorney general says of Mr. Durham: He is, "unfit for public office... a man with a history of racism and ideological zealotry." Sounds just right for a purge that affects, in the majority, non-white voters.

In Cuyahoga County (Cleveland), some citizens have been caught Registering While Black. A statistical analysis of would-be voters in Southern states by the watchdog group Democracy South indicates that black voters are three times as likely as white voters to have their registration requests "returned" (i.e., subject to rejection).

And to give a boost to this whitening of the voter rolls, for the first time since the days of Jim Crow, the Republicans are planning mass challenges of voters on Election Day. The GOP's announced plan to block 35,000 voters in Ohio ran up against the wrath of federal judges; so, in Florida, what appear to be similar plans had been kept under wraps until the discovery of documents called "caging" lists. The voters on the “caging” lists, disclosed last week by BBC Television London, are, almost exclusively, residents of African-American neighborhoods.

Those who mail in ballots are very trusting souls. Here's how your trust is used. In the August 31 primaries in Florida, Palm Beach Elections Supervisor Theresa LePore (a.k.a. Madame Butterfly Ballot) counted 37,839 absentee votes. But days before, her office told me only 29,000 ballots had been received. When this loaves-and-fishes miracle was disclosed, she was forced to recount, cutting the tally to 31,138.

It is well-reported that Broward County, Fla., failed to send out nearly 60,000 absentee ballots. What has not been nationally reported is that Broward's elections supervisor is a Jeb Bush appointee who took the post only after the governor took the unprecedented step of removing the prior elected supervisor who happened be a Democrat.

"If the vote is stolen here, it will be stolen in Rio Arriba County," a New Mexico politician told me. That's a reasoned surmise: in 2000, one in 10 votes simply weren't counted—chucked out, erased, discarded. In the voting biz, the technical term for these vanishing votes is "spoilage." Citizens cast ballots, but the machines don't notice. In one Rio Arriba precinct in the last go-'round, not one single vote was cast for president—or, at least, none showed up on the machines.

The total number of votes siphoned out of America's voting booths is so large, you won't find the issue reported in our self-glorifying news media. The one million missing black, brown and red votes spoiled, plus the hundreds of thousands flushed from voter registries, is our nation's dark secret: an apartheid democracy in which wealthy white votes almost always count, but minorities are often purged or challenged or simply not recorded. In effect, Kerry is down by a million votes before one lever is pulled, card punched or touch-screen touched.

More at Greg Palast.com

|
 
Pledge of Action to Stop A Stolen Election
11.02.04 (1:36 pm)   [edit]
"I remember the stolen presidential election of 2000 and I am willing to take action in 2004 if the election is stolen again. I support efforts to protect the right to vote leading up to and on Election Day, November 2nd. If that right is systematically violated, I pledge to join nationwide protests starting on November 3rd, either in my community, in the states where the fraud occurred, or in Washington DC."

Take the Pledge

|
 
Bush can get free acupuncture in Tokyo if he loses
11.02.04 (1:17 pm)   [edit]
A British acupuncturist in Tokyo has promised to treat everyone who walks into his clinic for free the day after the US election if George W. Bush loses -- even the would-be ex-president himself.

Edward Obaidey, who treats about 20 people a day, said he stood to lose about 120,000 yen (1,130 dollars) if Senator John Kerry wins.

"Maybe I've lost a few patients over this. But if Bush came in, I'd treat him as well. He probably needs a good going-over," Obaidey said.

Obaidey said he decided to make his offer after hearing widespread anger about Bush from his patients, even ones who tend to be apolitical.

"Normally I don't mind what goes in America but with this guy in, things have got so bad, not only for Americans but people all over the world," he said.

More

|

 
Why aren't Americans persuaded en masse?
11.02.04 (1:01 pm)   [edit]
By Linda Heard

So if we croissant-munching, tea-sipping, foreigners fail to see the merits in an endless-war rooting leader of the so-called free world, who believes the Creator resides on Pennsylvania Avenue, why aren’t Americans thus persuaded en masse?

Their economy is fragile and their national debt at an all time high along with the price of gasoline. Clinton’s $236 billion (Dh866 billion) fiscal surplus has been turned into a $422 billion (Dh1549 billion) deficit, the dollar flounders, while the minimum wage, for those with jobs, has fallen to a 50-year low.

On the foreign policy front, an article in the respected Lancet reports 100,000 civilians have lost their lives in Iraq due mostly to US bombs and missiles.

Fallujah is on the brink of being “pacified” with all the bloodshed that will entail, and daily news reports graphically portray kidnappings, decapitations and car bombings. There is still no exit strategy with billions being poured into the war chest.

Nevertheless, almost 50 per cent of America just isn’t getting it. Why can’t they see what the rest of us view so clearly? Why are any of them undecided, given the miserable and undeniable facts?

The US is polarised as rarely before. Bush supporters believe they are the true patriots putting America first. They care not that logic and debate are consigned to the backburner as their leader makes decisions based on gut feeling or divine inspiration.

They admire his absolute conviction. It doesn’t matter Iraq was invaded on a series of false pretexts or that Bush’s cronies are up to their eyes in corruption scandals.

They are untroubled by Bush’s long standing links with the Moonies or the fact their feline-phobic Attorney-General John Ashcroft earlier attended one of Moon’s prayer luncheons.

If the faithful are concerned Bush’s administration is jam packed with such ethically challenged individuals as Elliot Abrams, John Negroponte and John Poindexter, all formerly mired in the Iran-Contra scandal, they aren’t showing it.

And they don’t seem to mind that Israeli spies are running around the Pentagon unfettered or that an influential so-called neo-con group within that organisation puts Israel’s security before their own.

Bush is their man, who won’t be swayed by foreign treaties, international courts, the UN or even America’s so-called allies.

Even as an immaculately turned out Bin Laden threatens and taunts in a brand new video, and they learn that 370 tonnes of HMX explosive under IAEA seal disappeared during their commander-in-chief’s watch, they oddly hold to their icon as the one individual who can keep them safe.

Bush’s three-year-old commitment to “smoke him (Osama) out of his cave” is long forgotten.

Such gung ho rhetoric appeals to the Western states of Texas and Arizona, while Bush’s religiosity is a magnet for “Bible Belt” evangelicals, who, for the first time, have been mobilised to vote by their preachers.

Blue-collar workers in the polluting oil, gas, automobile manufacturing and logging industries know that Bush isn’t about to sign up to any namby-pamby Kyoto Protocol and so their jobs are safe while the Texan remains in office.

More importantly, there is a growing strain of extreme right wing Conservatism throughout the US, perhaps as a backlash to the 60s-engendered libertarian culture. That group is largely made up of gun lobbyist, xenophobic, homophobic, anti stem cell research, pro-lifers.

Bush maintains “freedom is on the march” while the ladies who turned up in “Protect our Civil Liberties” T-shirts to hear Bush give a stump speech would no doubt beg to differ. They were arrested for trespass, their T-shirts termed “obscene” by the campaign heavies.

So what does Kerry have to offer? The truth is nobody really knows. He is currently playing to the various choirs, telling them exactly what they want to hear so as to get his foot in the Oval Office.

His support of Israel is no doubt genuine but might be exaggerated so as to garner the Jewish and pro-Israel vote. This is of slight comfort to Palestinians.

On a positive note, he claims to be a multi-lateralist and promises to get America’s former allies back on side. He respects international laws and institutions, and, judging by his Senate record, he believes war should be a final resort.

What happens if the Bush camp wins through? As Teresa Heinz Kerry so succinctly put it before she was politely gagged as a PR liability: “Four more years of George W. Bush would equate to ‘four more years in hell’”.

Faced with the prospect of a second term for Bush, countries such as Iran and North Korea will push ahead with their nuclear programmes, anti-Americanism will be widespread and terrorism will spread like the plague.

This time the American people who gave Bush a mandate for four more years of the same will be blamed – 49 per cent of them unfairly – while the US will face a virtual civil war of competing ideologies. One thing is sure. Now that the formerly supine US media has offered its mea culpas, Bush and his cabal are in for a rocky ride.

More

|
 
Bin Laden threatens to bankrupt US
11.02.04 (12:48 pm)   [edit]
The terror mastermind whose al-Qaida network carried out the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks credited the religiously inspired Arab volunteers that he fought with against the Soviets in Afghanistan with having "bled Russia for 10 years, until it went bankrupt and was forced to withdraw in defeat." He suggested the same strategy would work against the United States.

"So we are continuing this policy in bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy," a calm and forceful bin Laden said in the tape that appeared near the end of a U.S. campaign that has focused on the war on terror as well as the foundering U.S. economy.

Bin Laden, in rhetoric that seemed to echo critical campaign headlines in the United States, accused President Bush of going to war in oil-rich Iraq simply to create business for military contractors linked to his administration.

In his message aimed at American listeners, bin Laden claimed al-Qaida was winning its war with the United States, and that contractors "like Halliburton and its kind" were also benefiting, while the losers were "the American people and their economy."

AP

|
 
Seismic events in the Middle East
11.02.04 (12:43 pm)   [edit]
By Youssef M. Ibrahim

There has rarely been a moment in recent Arab history when so many bells were tolling simultaneously; ushering big changes across many parts of the Greater Middle East. The rush of events is relentless, fast, and furious.

Yasser Arafat is fighting his last battle with dire consequences for Palestinians and Israelis. Turkey is rethinking its regional role as it strives to join the European Community.

American foreign policy is set to drift even further away from Arab allies and even closer to Israel after the presidential elections. Syria is caught in an international juggernaut of external pressures demanding a redefinition of its role in Lebanon.

Egypt is teeming with internal pressure demanding a wide array of change and clarity over succession in power. And once more, for the fourth time in a quarter century, Iraq and Iran are readjusting the balance of power of the Gulf region.

The likelihood of Arafat fading away from the Middle East scene may prove, in the end, to be a greater catalyst in changing the nature of the Israeli-Palestinian confrontation, more in fact, than Arafat’s life work has been.

As long as Arafat filled the picture, a stubborn government of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon was too happy to use him as an excuse not to negotiate but to expropriate Palestinian lands.

Ze’ev Schiff, the astute Israeli political analyst, summed up this strategy succinctly in the daily Ha’aretz of October 29 when he commented: “It is doubtful whether Prime Minister Ariel Sharon wants to see Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat out of the picture, and his authority delegated to another Palestinian leader.

"The demise of Arafat would also mean the demise of the Palestinian ‘non-partner’, the loss of the excuse for all of Israel’s main political decisions being taken unilaterally, without negotiating with the Palestinians or reaching an agreement”.

Another seismic change for the Arab world is coming from America. Regardless of who is president, the years-old Arab-American marriage is heading for divorce.

Whether Bush or Kerry takes the helm, the outcome will be an American government totally under the sway of enemies. Arab leaders who had parked comfortably in a consenting relationship with American presidents during the five decades are beginning to appreciate that the winds have shifted.

The question is what alternative allies they have up their sleeves. The sooner they find an answer the stronger their survival chance will be. But they should make no mistake.

The American mood has turned irrevocably hostile, as the people who will run the next American government no longer think stability in the Middle East has any strategic value.

In fact, the neoconservatives of both the Democratic and Republican parties view instability as desirable in the Greater Middle East.

The weakest regimes cannot run from the American bull and may well be trampled by unhappy citizens. It is highly advisable they make new friends among their people and their neighbours.

More

|
 
Wag the Dog
11.02.04 (6:01 am)   [edit]
The folks at Arte have quite a since of humor. Arte is an excellent television station, one I would compare to A&E in the states. The station decided to show 'Wag the Dog' last night in its original language, English, sub-titled in French. No doubt this wasn't done for it's french viewers.

The contrast between the goings on in this movie with politics today are eerie and hysterical at the same time. One thing we can be sure of..what we think we know is not the whole story.

Mass media in the states certainly didn't manufacture the Iraq war but it has certainly covered it in a underhanded way. If this were not true Americans would be screaming for the President's impeachment and the removal of troops from Iraq. Americans would share Europe's view of this President and his invasion.

|
 
Americans doubtful, divided and anxious
11.01.04 (1:58 pm)   [edit]
According to a NYT/CBS poll:

A majority of the respondents - and an overwhelming number of African-Americans - say they do not have a lot of confidence that their votes will be counted properly, and one-third said they expected to encounter problems when they go to vote.

Half of respondents in this latest poll said they did not think Bush legitimately won the presidency in 2000.

Fifty-one percent described it as the most negative presidential campaign in their memory.

Overall, just one-third of the respondents said that they had a lot of confidence that the votes for president will be counted properly this November. Forty-four percent said they had some confidence, while 21 percent said they had little or no confidence.

Fifty-two percent said they were "scared" or "concerned" about what Bush would do if re-elected; 56 percent said they were scared or concerned about what Kerry would do if he were elected.

IHT

|
 
Presidency may be decided in court
11.01.04 (1:06 pm)   [edit]
Barring a clear victory by either US President George W. Bush or his Democratic rival John Kerry, the stage is set for the presidential election to be decided in court instead of at the ballot box.

Thousands of Democratic and Republican party lawyers have already been deployed around the country as charges and allegations fly and vote-related lawsuits are filed.

"The likelihood is that if it's close it will go to the courts, even if there are only one or two states where it's close," Kevin McMahon, a political science professor at New York University-Fredonia, said.

news.com.au

|
 
China Criticizes Bush Over Iraq
11.01.04 (1:01 pm)   [edit]
On the eve of the U.S. presidential vote, China accused President Bush today of trying to "rule over the whole world," saying the Iraq war had destroyed the global anti-terrorism coalition and worsened religious and ethnic conflicts.

"Washington opened a Pandora's box," Vice Premier Qian Qichen wrote in the English-language China Daily. "The Iraq war was an optional one, not a necessary one."

Qian said that "the troubles and disasters" facing the United States stem "from its own cocksureness and arrogance."

LA Times

|
 
The Bush Pledge?
11.01.04 (11:12 am)   [edit]
This is a couple of days old but I just read it this morning. It gives me the creeps.

.—"I want you to stand, raise your right hands," and recite "the Bush Pledge," said Florida state Sen. Ken Pruitt. The assembled mass of about 2,000 in this Treasure Coast town about an hour north of West Palm Beach dutifully rose, arms aloft, and repeated after Pruitt: "I care about freedom and liberty. I care about my family. I care about my country. Because I care, I promise to work hard to re-elect, re-elect George W. Bush as president of the United States."

Slate

|
 
Jobless and Poorer
11.01.04 (10:47 am)   [edit]
Tommorrow's the big day. I have an appointment with administration to determine whether I am still eligible for the chomage (unemployment benefits paid by the government). Two years ago this wouldn't have been a problem but with new Sarkozy/Rafferin style government trying to balance the budget tommorrow may find me both jobless and poorer.
Finding a job in France or any other European country is hard enough for a citizen but for a resident who doesn't speak the language fluently and is middleaged it's impossible outside of knowing someone or working illegally.
The 'knowing someone' I'm working on but it takes time. Working illegally is not an option as I would like to continue living in the country.

If you find yourself with some extra cash and would like to help out I wouldn't refuse.

|