Bouillabaisse


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2006 March
2006 February
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January

My Links
Home
Sea-Eat
HaitiChildren.com
Adopt A Minefield
Info for Americans living abroad
Jewish Voice For Peace
Gush-Shalom
All Is One
The Hunger Site
Global Exchange
Peace Star Project
Iraq Occupation Watch
Peace Mid-East Dialogue Group
B'TSELEM
Parents Circle - Families Forum
Women's World
P10K

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog



Left Talk
04.16.05 (10:41 am)   [edit]
Two interesting pieces I read this morning. One is an interview with Naomi Klein

PULSE: How do you think September 11 affected political activism in this country?

KLEIN: I think the opposition to neo-liberalism is much, much stronger than it was in 1999. But I think activism in general, and in the United States in particular since September 11, has been very timid.

I think that there’s a climate of fear in the United States around being perceived as anti-government. There’s a fear of being in the streets. I saw this very clearly when I was in New York during the Republican convention. Certainly the opposition to the Bush administration and the war in Iraq and the sort of corporate takeover of politics was very, very clear; but in terms of the opposition, the way it was expressed was very timid and controlled. I think that’s a broader social issue that people in the U.S. really need to grapple with: what is the role of dissent in a democracy?


The other tells of Leonard Weinglass blasting U.S. policy on Cuba at Texas Southern University on April 5.

Weinglass contrasted the prosecution of the Cuban Five with the case of Orlando Bosch. Bosch was implicated in the deaths of 73 men, women and children when a bomb destroyed a Cubana Airlines passenger plane in 1976. Once described as “the most notorious terrorist in the hemisphere,” Bosch has friends close to Florida Gov. Jeb Bush. Despite a Justice Department recommendation that Bosch be denied residency, the Bush administration intervened on his behalf and today he walks the streets of Miami a free man.

Touching on the Bush administration’s general foreign policy and its “bizarre acceptance of the use of torture” in Afghanistan and Iraq, Weinglass said, “We are undergoing a crisis of illegality and lawlessness at the highest levels of government.”


Just a couple of vocal lefties in the U.S.. I hope they survive and propagate. Perhaps then there will be hope for the world.

Comment on this piece at Pourquoi Pas
 
Questions of life and death
04.15.05 (5:22 pm)   [edit]
I had a sudden reboot job and lost the link to a page I hope I can find again. I mention this because I will be referring to it and imagine there will be others interested in reading the 'real life' story I will mention.

The author whose name I do not know, although the name Craig or Chris comes to mind I can't be sure, tells the personal story of his life living with a serial killer. I will not attempt to tell the story only share the thoughts that came to me after reading it. It was a powerful story where reality and horror blend. It was not known by the family that this man had been murdering women for years as they passed from town to town. Only in the last years did things begin to click with the wife and she went to the authorities.

Throughout the story you read about a man that seemingly, if actions mean anything, cared for his family. These actions may have all been an act or self serving. I do not know. But, I sensed in the author a certain sadness although he made no secret that he hated the man and was happy he was finally executed. I do not know but got the impression that the author was against the death penalty but was able to reconcile with this one.

The story raised in me memories of my father and in fact my comment to this man went something like this; "Your essay stirred up feelings of my father who has been dead some years now. I miss him. He was an alcoholic and a sadistic brute. I lived in fear of him most of the time. But, there were those moments when he was dad. I loved him although I don't know why."

Only in the past few years and after moving to Europe have I began to question the death penalty. My questions arose after too many stories of innocent men being executed and not because of any feelings that putting to death a murderer is wrong. I had always without question accepted that the bad guys lose. It happened in every western and cop show I watched as a child. The good guys win and the bad guys lose. Realistically this is not true. In fact, my own life proved this. As a child I questioned everyday why God did not get me out of the horror story I lived in. As I grew up I began to realize that good, bad and all that's in-between mingle and all reap the fruits. These properties are inseperable in every aspect of our lives.

Although I live now in a culture that promotes life and aschews the death penalty as barbaric, I still believe there are times when it is acceptable. I question this feeling because I somehow know that they are right and I am wrong. But, the reality is that I don't feel this, at least not yet. I have fought all my life both literally and figuratively and accepted that the good hurt and die along with the bad.

But, I am against the death penalty today because I cannot reconcile with killing an innocent man. As stout as my heart is and no matter how well I understand the horrors men are able to inflict on each other and their children I cannot accept knowingly and calmly taking an innocent life. I am probably capable of killing but I am not a serial killer.

The plot is thickening and the story is getting longer than it should be so I will wind it up. I would like to go a bit further into American cultural thinking about good guys and bad guys but that can wait until another time and perhaps another author.

I've found the URL to the story mentioned in this piece. Do have a read and share your thoughts.

Life and Death

Comment on this piece at Pourquoi Pas
 
Many Iraqis killed in US air attack
04.14.05 (12:45 pm)   [edit]
More 'collateral' damage in Iraq.
Here today, gone tomorrow.
No rest for the weary
and no end in sight.

Twenty Iraqis have been killed and 22 injured after US helicopters and heavy artillery bombed houses in al-Rummana village, north of al-Qaim city, Aljazeera reported.

Seven children, six women and three old men were among the dead, witnesses said, while the injured included 13 children, seven women and two old men.

Al Jazeera

And, overall Iraq has less electricity each day than a year ago. Oil production has slipped below 2004's disappointing levels and 60% of the people depend on food handouts.

Two years after the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, much of Iraq's infrastructure remains impaired and insurgents are working to wreck the economy as fast as the U.S. and Iraqi governments can restore it.

The tattered and struggling country has become one of the world's poorest -- ranking at the level of Haiti and Senegal -- and economists see little hope for major improvements this year.

Yet some Iraqis say parts of their lives are improving. The country now boasts a freewheeling consumer economy flush with cell phones, Internet cafes and independent newspapers, along with plenty of high-paying government jobs.

12,000 to 20,000 guerrillas stage nearly 40 attacks a day, according to Pentagon figures, and do their best to tear down an economy that the U.S. and Iraqi governments are struggling to rebuild with $18.4 billion in U.S. taxpayer money.
Iraq Occupation Watch


There's either a great economic imbalance or a contradiction here. "Iraq has become one of the world's poorest yet there is a freewheeling consumer economy and plenty of high-paying jobs."

Sounds like a capitalist economy to me. Why would the insurgents want to tear it down?

Comment on this at Pourquoi Pas.
 
Analysing the French Non
04.13.05 (10:06 am)   [edit]
From the World Peace Herald we get a very interesting analysis on the reasons behind the current French rejection of the EU constituion.

If French voters reject the EU's first ever constitution on May 29, as recent polls suggest, it will largely be because the country's disgruntled electorate believes the charter will destroy Europe's beloved social model.

Rising unemployment, falling wages, Turkey's possible membership of the EU and the unpopularity of Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin's center-right government all help explain why support for the "yes" camp has plummeted in recent weeks. But the one rallying cry that unites both right- and left-wing opponents of the constitution is "Yes to a Social Europe!"

This slogan means different things to different people.

"In some countries, social cohesion means having the trade unions on board, and sustainable development means having Greenpeace on board," quipped the European Commissioner for Enterprise and Industry Gunter Verheugen last week. "I tell people everywhere, 'You can have a strong economy without social cohesion. But you cannot have social cohesion -- whatever that is -- without a strong economy.'"

In France, a country wedded to short working hours, long holidays and high unemployment, such views are considered heretical. Given the choice between a strong economy and a generous welfare state backed up by first-class public services, most French would plump for the latter. Hence many voters' opposition to the EU constitution, which is perceived as being too "liberal," (in the classical sense), too free-trade oriented and too "Anglo-Saxon."

"Our ambition for a powerful and united Europe" will end up "drifting toward a large market open to all winds and politically diluted," wrote former prime minister and leading Socialist "non" campaigner Laurent Fabius last month. Fearing the constitution will put "an end to any social striving," Jacques Nikonoff, president of the influential pressure group Attac-France, says: "This crisis is the direct result of political choices made by EU governments and the European Commission, putting competitiveness and the market ahead of any other considerations, such as cooperation, solidarity and social justice."

Comment on this piece at Pourquoi Pas?
 
Will the U.S. harbor a terrorist?
04.13.05 (8:54 am)   [edit]

He is a highly controversial figure who was a Bay of Pigs veteran with ties to the CIA dating back to the 1960s. An icon to some in the exile community, Luis Posada Carriles has been linked to assassination and sabotage operations against Castro and his government, including a string of bombings against Havana tourist spots in 1997.

He worked for the Venezuelan secret police for several years. Then, in 1976, he and Miami pediatrician Orlando Bosch were arrested following the midair bombing of a Cubana airliner that killed all 73 people aboard.

But in 1985, Posada escaped from prison. He turned up a year later in El Salvador, where he worked for an unauthorized Nicaraguan contra resupply network overseen by then-National Security Council staffer Oliver North.

In 1997, he first admitted and then denied masterminding the bombing attacks on several Havana hotels and restaurants that catered to foreign tourists, who provided needed currency to cash-strapped Cuba.

Three years later, Posada and three Miami exiles were arrested in Panama after Castro, visiting for a heads-of-state summit, alleged at a news conference that they were plotting to kill him. The four claimed they were trying to help a Cuban general defect.

The Cuban militant suspected of plotting to kill Fidel Castro plans to seek asylum in the United States in hopes of avoiding prosecution in Venezuela for allegedly blowing up a Cuban airliner in 1976, according to a lawyer who will represent him.

Luis Posada Carriles, 77, whom Castro has described as ``the worst terrorist in the hemisphere,'' is also wanted by Cuba and could face execution if he were extradited there.

Benefiting from the murderous tolerance granted in the United States to the same individuals who were being fought against by the five anti-terrorist Cuban patriots still unjustly imprisoned by imperialist justice, Posada has illegally returned to US territory with no problem. CSC

Were Posada to emerge publicly in Miami, his presence could pose an embarrassing foreign-relations dilemma for the Bush administration. Amid the U.S. war on global terrorism, Posada's alleged involvement in hotel bombings and assassination plots could leave the nation open to criticism, especially by Cuba and Venezuela, whose governments are antagonistic toward American policies.

One would think the Bush administration would want to stay far away from Posada. Posada's terrorist actions are well known and Bush is fighting a 'war on terror' isn't he?

Posada, however, does not face any charges in the United States.

What would happen if Osama were to seek asylum in Cuba? This question will take on more meaning depending on how the US government deals with a man accused of terrorist acts in other parts of the world.

Comment on this piece at Pourquoi Pas?
 
A shameless marketing tool
04.13.05 (8:49 am)   [edit]
Because I am seeing several friends and supporters continue to carry the link to this blog I thought of finding a way to use it again. Pourquoi Pas keeps me very busy and although I would not be able to keep up with comments here I can continue to post relevant articles dealing with humanrights, peace and justice issues. I may even do a little photoblogging.
Although I will have no comment capabilities here any articles I post will be crossposted at Pourquoi Pas and if you desire to make a comment are invited to do so there.

Pourquoi Pas is still small but we are slowly gaining members from different parts of the world which will help in our effort to make it a blog with a world view rather than a US centric one.

a tout a l heure