 Blog For Free!
Archives
Home
2006 March
2006 February
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January
My Links
Home
Sea-Eat
HaitiChildren.com
Adopt A Minefield
Info for Americans living abroad
Jewish Voice For Peace
Gush-Shalom
All Is One
The Hunger Site
Global Exchange
Peace Star Project
Iraq Occupation Watch
Peace Mid-East Dialogue Group
B'TSELEM
Parents Circle - Families Forum
Women's World
P10K
tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images
Sponsored
Blog
|
| What is genocide? |
| 05.12.05 (2:19 pm) [edit] |
 | List of massacres, compiled by refugees in Touloum refugee camp, Chad. The refugees are desperate to have their stories told - they want the world to know where, when, what and who. Photo by Jerry Fowler |
The crime of genocide is defined in international law in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide.
Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
- Killing members of the group;
- Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
- Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
- Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
- Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Article III: The following acts shall be punishable:
- Genocide;
- Conspiracy to commit genocide;
- Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
- Attempt to commit genocide;
- Complicity in genocide.
The Genocide Convention was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 9 December 1948. The Convention entered into force on 12 January 1951. More than 130 nations have ratified the Genocide Convention and over 70 nations have made provisions for the punishment of genocide in domestic criminal law. The text of Article II of the Genocide Convention was included as a crime in Article 6 of the 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
Combining extremist ideology with ethnic animosity and a diabolical disregard for human life always ends in genocide. Examples would be the Ottoman Empire during the Armenian genocide, the Soviet Union under Stalin, Nazi Germany during the Holocaust, and more recently in East Timor (pdf), Guatemala, Yugoslavia and Rwanda and Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge regime headed by Pol Pot.
Gregory H. Stanton wrote Eight Stages of Genocide in 1996.
Genocide is a process that develops in eight stages that are predictable but not inexorable. At each stage, preventive measures can stop it. The later stages must be preceded by the earlier stages, though earlier stages continue to operate throughout the process.
- Classification: All cultures have categories to distinguish people into "us and them" by ethnicity, race, religion, or nationality.
- Symbolization: We name people "Jews" or "Gypsies", or distinguish them by colors or dress; and apply them to members of groups.
- Dehumanization: One group denies the humanity of the other group. Members of it are equated with animals, vermin, insects or diseases. Dehumanization overcomes the normal human revulsion against murder.
- Organization: Genocide is always organized, usually by the state, though sometimes informally (Hindu mobs led by local RSS militants) or by terrorist groups.
- Polarization: Extremists drive the groups apart. Hate groups broadcast polarizing propaganda. Laws may forbid intermarriage or social interaction.
- Preparation: Victims are identified and separated out because of their ethnic or religious identity. Death lists are drawn up. Members of victim groups are forced to wear identifying symbols. They are often segregated into ghettoes, forced into concentration camps, or confined to a famine-struck region and starved.
- Extermination: Extermination begins, and quickly becomes the mass killing legally called "genocide." It is "extermination" to the killers because they do not believe their victims to be fully human. When it is sponsored by the state, the armed forces often work with militias to do the killing.
- Denial: Denial is the eighth stage that always follows a genocide. It is among the surest indicators of further genocidal massacres. The perpetrators of genocide dig up the mass graves, burn the bodies, try to cover up the evidence and intimidate the witnesses. They deny that they committed any crimes, and often blame what happened on the victims. They block investigations of the crimes, and continue to govern until driven from power by force, when they flee into exile. There they remain with impunity, like Pol Pot or Idi Amin, unless they are captured and a tribunal is established to try them.
The best response to denial is punishment by an international tribunal or national courts. There the evidence can be heard, and the perpetrators punished. Tribunals like the Yugoslav, Rwanda, or Sierra Leone Tribunals, an international tribunal to try the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, and ultimately the International Criminal Court must be created. They may not deter the worst genocidal killers. But with the political will to arrest and prosecute them, some mass murderers may be brought to justice.
Eleven years ago we watched and abandoned Rwanda’s Tutsis to genocide. 800,000 people were murdered. When Lt. Gen. Roméo Dallaire requested reinforcements for the 2,500 United Nations peacekeepers in Rwanda and a mandate to stop the genocide, the U.N. Security Council instead voted to withdraw U.N. troops.
As the death toll mounted, General Dallaire submitted a detailed plan for a Rapid Reaction Force. He needed 5,000 soldiers to dismantle the killing machine of the genocidaire and to stop the Hutu power movement. The UN Security Council rejected the plan. The United States even refused to acknowledge the genocide to avoid any legal obligations to help. Indepth: Romeo Dallaire
During a recent trip to Khartoum and a brief excursion into Darfur, US Deputy Secretary of State Robert Zoellick refused to confirm the Bush administration's previous genocide determination. Former Bush administration Secretary of State Colin Powell: "genocide has been committed in Darfur, and that the government of Sudan and the Janjaweed bear responsibility" (testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, September 9, 2004). Zoellick, when specifically asked about Powell's determination, declared it a "former Secretary of State" simply "making a point" to Congress (Financial Times, April 15, 2005). "I don't want to get into a debate over terminology," [Zoellick] said, when asked if the US believed that genocide was still being committed in Darfur against the mostly African villagers by Arab militias and their government backers (Financial Times, April 15, 2005). No doubt Zoellick was also well aware that the Bush administration would soon be flying to Washington one of Khartoum's most notorious genocidaires, Major General Saleh 'Gosh', head of security and intelligence for the National Islamic Front regime.
Attention to Darfur's staggering death toll---which has grown to approximately 400,000 over the course of more than two years of genocidal conflict---has increased dramatically in the past several months. Darfur Mortality Update: April 30, 2005
Robert Zoellick said this past month that the State Department's estimate of deaths in Darfur was 60,000 to 160,000. Why is the Bush administration now backtracking and understating the genocide in Darfur? What does it say about us that Mr. Zoellick thinks his numbers are more acceptable? Youk Chhang, Director of Documentation Center of Cambodia (DC-Cam)Documentation Center of Cambodia (DC-Cam) wrote an article entitled, Pol Pot Can Walk Out of the Grave telling how Pol Pot's ideology "If you are to eradicate grasses, you must eradicate all their roots" or "Keeping you is no gain, losing you is no loss" continues to have a deep impact on present-day Cambodia because defecting Khmer Rouge leaders are now in the government and the military, functioning as decision-makers and setting down policies for Cambodian society.
The following link is to a declassified transcripts of telephone conversations between President Nixon and his secretary of state, Henry Kissinger. It's only a taste of what goes on behind the scenes and what we the public don't hear or see when the big boys clean themselves up for PR. Nixon and Kissinger escalate the bombing of Cambodia (pdf)
Former US National Security Adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, on China and the Khmer Rouge, 1979:
“I encouraged the Chinese to support Pol Pot. Pol Pot was an abomination. We could never support him, but China could.” According to Brzezinski, the USA “winked, semi-publicly” at Chinese and Thai aid to the Khmer Rouge.
Coming to a conclusion and a point is difficult. I fear very few will actually make it this far. The post is way too long for most to bother with. But, I have only touched the surface of this issue here. I suppose the point is that genocide is staring us in the face in Darfur this minute. Our governing bodies will do nothing unless they hear from us. In fact, they will many times participate in the genocide if only by proxy or denial as Mr. Zoellick has. Kofi Annan said the UN Security Council bears the ultimate responsiblity. The Security Council decided to refer the situation to the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC).
UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan welcomed the Security Council's decision as one that would "ensure that those responsible for atrocities in Darfur are held to account." The text, which refers to developments in Darfur since 1 July 2002, was adopted just before midnight Thursday (New York time) by a vote of 11 in favour, with Algeria, Brazil, China and the United States abstaining. In particular European powers had lobbied for the decision.
The Khartoum government, on the other hand, today made it clear it would not support the Security Council decision. Several high-ranking Sudanese government officials risk being accused of war crimes by the ICC. The government in a statement indicated it would not cooperate with the Court, rejecting "the prosecution of any Sudanese national outside of the country."
In January 2005, an international commission of inquiry appointed by the UN recommended that the UN Security Council refer the situation in Darfur to the ICC - the only means by which the Court could assume jurisdiction in this instance. The commission found that the Sudanese government and militias were responsible for serious violations of international human rights and humanitarian law, amounting to crimes under international law.
Opposition by several major powers so far however had hindered the referral of war crime cases in Darfur to the ICC. In particular the Washington government opposed the move as the US does not recognise the ICC. Further, China, an ally of the Khartoum government, protested the solution. Both China and the US have veto powers in the Security Council and only their abstention in the vote secured this night's resolution.
The use of the ICC has also been strongly lobbied by human rights groups all over the world, in particular in the US. The groups hold that the ICC is the only institution that can bring justice to Darfur's many war crime victims. This night's decision was therefore celebrated as a major victory by these groups, several UN institutions and governments in Europe. Relief as Darfur war crimes are referred to ICC
As of today nothing has changed.
"I feel terrible about the September 11 terrorist attacks – it was absolutely grotesque - but you mobilized the world. No one was mobilized when 800,000 were killed in Rwanda, and they are just as human." Lt. Gen. Roméo A. Dallaire
Comment on this post at Pourquoi Pas
|
|
|
| |
|
|